Characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at CT colonographic screening: implications for appropriate polyp size thresholds for polypectomy versus surveillance.

OBJECTIVE Advanced adenomas are the primary target in colorectal screening. The purpose of this study was to delineate the prevalence and imaging characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at screening CT colonography (CTC) and the rates of invasive carcinoma and high-grade dysplasia for various polyp size categories. These observations may be a basis for formulation of polypectomy thresholds and CTC surveillance strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS The imaging and pathologic findings for polyps measuring 6 mm or more obtained from a CTC screening population of 3,536 persons during a 32-month period were retrospectively reviewed. From this group, prevalence, size, histologic features, morphologic features, and location of advanced adenomas were tabulated. Advanced adenomas were defined by size (> or = 10 mm) and/or histologic findings (prominent villous component or high-grade dysplasia). RESULTS A total of 123 (38.3%) of 321 adenomas measuring 6 mm or more were classified as advanced, the overall prevalence being 3.1% (111 of 3,536 patients). The mean size of advanced adenomas was 16.6 +/- 11.6 mm; most of the lesions (116/123, 94.3%) qualified as advanced on the basis of the size criterion alone. The seven lesions measuring 6-9 mm constituted 3.4% (7/205) of all medium-sized adenomas. The largest percentage (65/123, 52.8%) of the advanced adenomas had tubular histologic features, followed by tubulovillous (50/123, 40.6%), villous (5/123, 4.1%), and serrated (3/123, 2.4%) histologic features. High-grade dysplasia was uncommon (6/123, 4.9%), typically occurring in large lesions. Seven cases of cancer were detected, all lesions measuring 10 mm or more in size. The majority of advanced adenomas were classified as sessile (57/123, 46.3%) or pedunculated (57/123, 46.3%); a small percentage were flat (9/123, 7.3%). Advanced adenomas were located in the proximal colon in 43.9% (54/123) and distal colon in 56.1% (69/123) of the cases. CONCLUSION Advanced adenomas were generally large (> or = 10 mm in size); only a small percentage were medium sized (6-9 mm). There was a very low prevalence of high-grade dysplasia and invasive carcinoma in this series, particularly in the medium-sized group of lesions. These findings lend support to the practice of CTC screening in which large polyp size is used as a surrogate measure for the possible presence of advanced histologic features and medium-sized lesions are followed with noninvasive surveillance protocols.

[1]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays. , 2005, Radiology.

[2]  J. Church.  Clinical significance of small colorectal polyps , 2004, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[3]  Vishal Ghevariya,et al.  The Rate of Adenocarcinoma in Endoscopically Removed Colorectal Polyps , 2005, The American surgeon.

[4]  Pickhardt Pj.  TRAPIANTO DI PANCREAS ISOLATO: RISULTATI METABOLICI ED EFFETTI SULLE COMPLICANZE CRONICHE DEL DIABETE , 2005 .

[5]  L. Sobin,et al.  Colon and Rectum , 1998 .

[6]  A. Zauber,et al.  The National Polyp Study , 1990 .

[7]  D. Rex,et al.  Colonic adenomas: prevalence and incidence rates, growth rates, and miss rates at colonoscopy. , 2000, Seminars in gastrointestinal disease.

[8]  S. Itzkowitz,et al.  The molecular and genetic basis of colon cancer. , 2002, The Medical clinics of North America.

[9]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates. , 2004, Radiology.

[10]  A. Zauber,et al.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. , 1993 .

[11]  A. Zauber,et al.  The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. , 2002, Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America.

[12]  John R. Mashey,et al.  Evolution of the , 1998 .

[13]  M. Vatn,et al.  Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. , 1996, Gut.

[14]  L. Seeff,et al.  Is there endoscopic capacity to provide colorectal cancer screening to the unscreened population in the United States? , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[15]  Ann G Zauber,et al.  National Polyp Study data: Evidence for regression of adenomas , 2004, International journal of cancer.

[16]  H Shinya,et al.  Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colonic polyps. , 1979, Annals of surgery.

[17]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  J. Bond,et al.  Clinical evidence for the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, and the management of patients with colorectal adenomas. , 2000, Seminars in gastrointestinal disease.

[19]  P. Pickhardt.  Virtual colonoscopy for primary screening. The future is now. , 2005, Minerva chirurgica.

[20]  Perry J Pickhardt,et al.  Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers. , 2006, Radiology.

[21]  T. Muto,et al.  The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum , 1975, Cancer.

[22]  Aaron Sloman,et al.  The evolution of what , 1998 .

[23]  A. Zauber,et al.  The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. , 1990, Gastroenterology.

[24]  H. Pohl,et al.  Prevalence of clinically important histology in small adenomas. , 2006, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[25]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2006 , 2006, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[26]  J. Saurin,et al.  [Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults]. , 2004, Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique.

[27]  J S SPRATT,et al.  THE RATES AND PATTERNS OF GROWTH OF 375 TUMORS OF THE LARGE INTESTINE AND RECTUM OBSERVED SERIALLY BY DOUBLE CONTRAST ENEMA STUDY (MALMOE TECHNIQUE). , 1963, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[28]  Patrick M M Bossuyt,et al.  Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. , 2004, Gastroenterology.