Migrating bubble during break-induced replication drives conservative DNA synthesis

The repair of chromosomal double strand breaks (DSBs) is crucial for the maintenance of genomic integrity. However, the repair of DSBs can also destabilize the genome by causing mutations and chromosomal rearrangements, the driving forces for carcinogenesis and hereditary diseases. Break-induced replication (BIR) is one of the DSB repair pathways that is highly prone to genetic instability. BIR proceeds by invasion of one broken end into a homologous DNA sequence followed by replication that can copy hundreds of kilobases of DNA from a donor molecule all the way through its telomere. The resulting repaired chromosome comes at a great cost to the cell, as BIR promotes mutagenesis, loss of heterozygosity, translocations, and copy number variations, all hallmarks of carcinogenesis. BIR uses most known replication proteins to copy large portions of DNA, similar to S-phase replication. It has therefore been suggested that BIR proceeds by semiconservative replication; however, the model of a bona fide, stable replication fork contradicts the known instabilities associated with BIR such as a 1,000-fold increase in mutation rate compared to normal replication. Here we demonstrate that in budding yeast the mechanism of replication during BIR is significantly different from S-phase replication, as it proceeds via an unusual bubble-like replication fork that results in conservative inheritance of the new genetic material. We provide evidence that this atypical mode of DNA replication, dependent on Pif1 helicase, is responsible for the marked increase in BIR-associated mutations. We propose that the BIR mode of synthesis presents a powerful mechanism that can initiate bursts of genetic instability in eukaryotes, including humans.

[1]  J. Lupski,et al.  A Microhomology-Mediated Break-Induced Replication Model for the Origin of Human Copy Number Variation , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[2]  A. Malkova,et al.  Defective Break-Induced Replication Leads to Half-Crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Genetics.

[3]  W. L. Fangman,et al.  Activation of replication origins within yeast chromosomes. , 1991, Annual review of cell biology.

[4]  C Conti,et al.  Molecular Combing , 2001, Current protocols in cytometry.

[5]  A. Malkova,et al.  Defective Resection at DNA Double-Strand Breaks Leads to De Novo Telomere Formation and Enhances Gene Targeting , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[6]  J. Haber,et al.  Mutations arising during repair of chromosome breaks. , 2012, Annual review of genetics.

[7]  P. V. Shcherbakova,et al.  3' -> 5' Exonucleases of DNA Polymerases ε and δ Correct Base Analog Induced DNA Replication Errors on opposite DNA Strands in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae , 1996 .

[8]  T. Allers,et al.  Stabilization and electrophoretic analysis of meiotic recombination intermediates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[9]  O. Aparicio,et al.  New vectors for simplified construction of BrdU‐Incorporating strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Yeast.

[10]  V. Costanzo,et al.  Studying DNA replication fork stability in Xenopus egg extract. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[11]  J. Pohjoismäki,et al.  Of circles, forks and humanity: Topological organisation and replication of mammalian mitochondrial DNA , 2011, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[12]  A. Malkova,et al.  Break-Induced Replication Is Highly Inaccurate , 2011, PLoS biology.

[13]  D. Gordenin,et al.  Hypermutability of Damaged Single-Strand DNA Formed at Double-Strand Breaks and Uncapped Telomeres in Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[14]  B. J. Brewer,et al.  Analysis of replication intermediates by two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis. , 1995, Methods in enzymology.

[15]  Janina Maier,et al.  Guide to yeast genetics and molecular biology. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[16]  Romain Koszul,et al.  Segmental Duplications Arise from Pol32-Dependent Repair of Broken Forks through Two Alternative Replication-Based Mechanisms , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[17]  J. Mccusker,et al.  Three new dominant drug resistance cassettes for gene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Yeast.

[18]  J. Haber,et al.  Chromosome break-induced DNA replication leads to nonreciprocal translocations and telomere capture. , 1998, Genetics.

[19]  B. Alberts,et al.  DNA synthesis dependent on genetic recombination: Characterization of a reaction catalyzed by purified bacteriophage T4 proteins , 1986, Cell.

[20]  L. Symington,et al.  Aberrant Double-Strand Break Repair Resulting in Half Crossovers in Mutants Defective for Rad51 or the DNA Polymerase δ Complex , 2009, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[21]  Steven A. Roberts,et al.  Clustered mutations in yeast and in human cancers can arise from damaged long single-strand DNA regions. , 2012, Molecular cell.

[22]  Bruce Stillman,et al.  Break-induced replication requires all essential DNA replication factors except those specific for pre-RC assembly. , 2010, Genes & development.

[23]  J. Haber,et al.  RAD50 and RAD51 define two pathways that collaborate to maintain telomeres in the absence of telomerase. , 1999, Genetics.

[24]  P. Philippsen,et al.  New heterologous modules for classical or PCR‐based gene disruptions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1994, Yeast.

[25]  D. Gordenin,et al.  A single-strand specific lesion drives MMS-induced hyper-mutability at a double-strand break in yeast. , 2010, DNA repair.

[26]  J. Haber,et al.  Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32 , 2007, Nature.

[27]  P. V. Shcherbakova,et al.  3'-->5' exonucleases of DNA polymerases epsilon and delta correct base analog induced DNA replication errors on opposite DNA strands in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1996, Genetics.

[28]  D. Ferguson,et al.  Recombinational repair of gaps in DNA is asymmetric in Ustilago maydis and can be explained by a migrating D-loop model. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[30]  Anna Malkova,et al.  Pif1 helicase and Polδ promote recombination-coupled DNA synthesis via bubble migration , 2013, Nature.

[31]  A. Kuzminov Collapse and repair of replication forks in Escherichia coli , 1995, Molecular microbiology.

[32]  T. Petes,et al.  Inverted DNA Repeats Channel Repair of Distant Double-Strand Breaks into Chromatid Fusions and Chromosomal Rearrangements , 2007, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[33]  L. Symington,et al.  RAD51-Dependent Break-Induced Replication in Yeast , 2004, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[34]  J. Haber,et al.  RAD51-Dependent Break-Induced Replication Differs in Kinetics and Checkpoint Responses from RAD51-Mediated Gene Conversion , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[35]  A. Malkova,et al.  Break-induced replication: functions and molecular mechanism. , 2013, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[36]  K. Kreuzer,et al.  Recombination-dependent DNA replication stimulated by double-strand breaks in bacteriophage T4 , 1995, Journal of bacteriology.

[37]  Jiri Bartek,et al.  An Oncogene-Induced DNA Damage Model for Cancer Development , 2008, Science.

[38]  L. Symington,et al.  Break-induced replication: What is it and what is it for? , 2008, Cell cycle.

[39]  L. Symington,et al.  Template switching during break-induced replication , 2007, Nature.