Causes of Individual Differences in Animal Exploration and Search

Numerous studies have documented individual differences in exploratory tendencies and other phenomena related to search, and these differences have been linked to fitness. Here, I discuss the origins of these differences, focusing on how experience shapes animal search and exploration. The origin of individual differences will also depend upon the alternatives to exploration that are available. Given that search and exploration frequently carry significant costs, we might expect individuals to utilize cues indicating the potential net payoffs of exploration versus the exploitation of known acts. Informative cues could arise from both recent and early-life experiences, from both the social and physical environment. Open questions are the extent to which an individual's exploratory tendencies are fixed throughout life versus being flexibly adjusted according to prevailing conditions and the actions of other individuals, and the extent to which individual differences in exploration extend across domains and are independent of other processes.

[1]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Individual differences in plasticity and sampling when playing behavioural games , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  Thomas T. Hills.  Animal Foraging and the Evolution of Goal-Directed Cognition , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  R. R. Warner.  Male versus female influences on mating-site determination in a coral reef fish , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Simon M. Reader,et al.  Social learning of escape routes in zebrafish and the stability of behavioural traditions , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[6]  B. Galef,et al.  Complete maternal deprivation affects social, but not spatial, learning in adult rats. , 2003, Developmental psychobiology.

[7]  A. Sih,et al.  Behavioral Syndromes: An Integrative Overview , 2004, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[8]  J. Krebs,et al.  Learning and Foraging: Individuals, Groups, and Populations , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[9]  S. Reader,et al.  Social Performance Cues Induce Behavioral Flexibility in Humans , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[10]  K. Laland,et al.  Foraging innovation in the guppy , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  Julie Morand-Ferron,et al.  Larger groups of passerines are more efficient problem solvers in the wild , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  B. Heinrich.  Neophilia and exploration in juvenile common ravens, Corvus corax , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  R. L. Day,et al.  Interactions between shoal size and conformity in guppy social foraging , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  S. Reader,et al.  Social learning of novel route preferences in adult humans , 2008, Biology Letters.

[15]  Z. Barta,et al.  The effect of energy reserves on social foraging: hungry sparrows scrounge more , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Angela J. Yu,et al.  Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  P. Dayan,et al.  Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans , 2006, Nature.

[18]  D. Stephens.  Change, regularity, and value in the evolution of animal learning , 1991 .

[19]  J. Stamps,et al.  Developmental perspectives on personality: implications for ecological and evolutionary studies of individual differences , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  A. Kamil,et al.  A comparative study of cache recovery by three corvid species , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  P. Drent,et al.  Individual differences in the use of social information in foraging by captive great tits , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Eamonn B. Mallon,et al.  Information flow, opinion polling and collective intelligence in house-hunting social insects. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Learning behaviorally stable solutions to producer–scrounger games , 2010 .

[24]  M. Elgar.  House sparrows establish foraging flocks by giving chirrup calls if the resources are divisible , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Suboptimal tradeoffs in information seeking , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  S. Reader,et al.  Early maternal care predicts reliance on social learning about food in adult rats. , 2013, Developmental psychobiology.

[27]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[28]  H. Anisman,et al.  Maternal programming of defensive responses through sustained effects on gene expression , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[29]  Kimberley J. Mathot,et al.  Testing dynamic variance-sensitive foraging using individual differences in basal metabolic rates of zebra finches. , 2009 .

[30]  K. Laland,et al.  Social transmission of maladaptive information in the guppy , 1998 .

[31]  Rufus A Johnstone,et al.  Managing uncertainty: information and insurance under the risk of starvation. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[32]  A. Thornton,et al.  Innovative problem solving in wild meerkats , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Frequency-dependent payoffs and sequential decision-making favour consistent tactic use , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[34]  S. Reader.  Evo-devo, modularity, and evolvability: insights for cultural evolution , 2006 .

[35]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Chapter 2 Social Foraging and the Study of Exploitative Behavior , 2008 .

[36]  T. W. Fawcett,et al.  Previous experiences shape adaptive mate preferences , 2009 .

[37]  Arnon Lotem,et al.  Individual-learning ability predicts social-foraging strategy in house sparrows , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  Allen Newell,et al.  Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search , 1976, CACM.

[39]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Propagation of innovations in networked groups. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[40]  L. Lefebvre,et al.  Innovative foraging behaviour in birds: What characterizes an innovator? , 2011, Behavioural Processes.

[41]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Behavioural ecology: Tool manufacture by naive juvenile crows , 2005, Nature.

[42]  P. R. Wiepkema,et al.  Consistent individual differences in early exploratory behaviour of male great tits , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Group Foraging: The Skill Pool Effect and Frequency-Dependent Learning , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[44]  Vladas Griskevicius,et al.  When the Economy Falters , Do People Spend or Save ? Responses to Resource Scarcity Depend on Childhood Environments , 2013 .

[45]  C. Sturdy,et al.  Sometimes slower is better: slow-exploring birds are more sensitive to changes in a vocal discrimination task , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[46]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Foraging : behavior and ecology , 2007 .

[47]  H. Kummer,et al.  Conditions of Innovative Behaviour in Primates , 1985 .

[48]  Sabine Tebbich,et al.  The ecology of tool-use in the woodpecker finch (Cactospiza pallida) , 2002 .

[49]  D. Kelly,et al.  Neophobia and Dietary Conservatism:Two Distinct Processes? , 1999, Evolutionary Ecology.

[50]  David Lazer,et al.  The Network Structure of Exploration and Exploitation , 2007 .

[51]  T. Lillicrap,et al.  Why Copy Others? Insights from the Social Learning Strategies Tournament , 2010, Science.

[52]  L. Lefebvre,et al.  Innovation in groups: does the proximity of others facilitate or inhibit performance? , 2009 .

[53]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Search in External and Internal Spaces , 2008, Psychological science.

[54]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Looking Forward and Looking Backward: Cognitive and Experiential Search , 2000 .

[55]  Christian Rutz,et al.  Development of tool use in New Caledonian crows: inherited action patterns and social influences , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[56]  V. Lovic,et al.  Maternal and littermate deprivation disrupts maternal behavior and social-learning of food preference in adulthood: tactile stimulation, nest odor, and social rearing prevent these effects. , 2006, Developmental psychobiology.

[57]  L. Lefebvre,et al.  Social learning and sociality , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[58]  P. Hogeweg,et al.  Resource distributions and diet development by trial-and-error learning , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[59]  J. Stamps,et al.  Adaptive effects of natal experience on habitat selection by dispersers , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  K. Laland,et al.  Age differences in neophilia, exploration, and innovation in family groups of callitrichid monkeys , 2005, American journal of primatology.

[61]  Simon M. Reader,et al.  Innovation and social learning: individual variation and brain evolution * , 2003 .

[62]  K. Laland,et al.  Animal innovation: An introduction. , 2003 .

[63]  Thomas T. Hills,et al.  Cognitive search : evolution, algorithms, and the brain , 2012 .

[64]  Kimberley J. Mathot,et al.  Increasing vulnerability to predation increases preference for the scrounger foraging tactic , 2007 .

[65]  K. Laland,et al.  Primate Innovation: Sex, Age and Social Rank Differences , 2001, International Journal of Primatology.

[66]  Human creativity: Two Darwinian analyses. , 2003 .

[67]  Allen Newell,et al.  Elements of a theory of human problem solving. , 1958 .

[68]  S. Tebbich,et al.  Do woodpecker finches acquire tool-use by social learning? , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[69]  Kimberley J. Mathot,et al.  Family-related differences in social foraging tactic use in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[70]  Kimberley J. Mathot,et al.  Adaptive strategies for managing uncertainty may explain personality-related differences in behavioural plasticity , 2012 .

[71]  K. Laland.  Social learning strategies , 2004, Learning & behavior.

[72]  M. Frank,et al.  Prefrontal and striatal dopaminergic genes predict individual differences in exploration and exploitation. , 2009, Nature neuroscience.

[73]  John H. Miller,et al.  Decentralization and the Search for Policy Solutions , 2000 .

[74]  John L. Quinn,et al.  Who are the innovators? A field experiment with 2 passerine species , 2011 .

[75]  J. Templeton,et al.  Mode of foraging competition is related to tutor preference in Zenaida aurita. , 1996, Journal of comparative psychology.

[76]  O. Bininda-Emonds,et al.  Exploration strategies map along fast–slow metabolic and life‐history continua in muroid rodents , 2009 .

[77]  A. J. Frost,et al.  Plasticity in animal personality traits: does prior experience alter the degree of boldness? , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[78]  N. Dingemanse,et al.  Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.