Safety Evaluation of Curve Delineation Improvements

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety effectiveness of treatments aimed at improving horizontal curve delineation. Different target crash types were considered in the analysis: total, nighttime, daytime, rainy, nonrainy, run-off-road, non-run-off-road, injury, and property damage only. The treatment sites for this study were 15 curves of the motorway A16 Naples–Canosa in Italy. All curves were characterized by small radius, large deflection angle, available sight distance smaller than the stopping sight distance, and superelevation smaller than the demanded one at both the design and the operating speed. Treatment typologies included installation of chevron signs; installation of curve warning signs and chevron signs; and installation of curve warning signs, chevron signs, and sequential flashing beacons along the curve. An empirical Bayes observational before-and-after study was performed. Results indicate statistically significant crash reductions in total, nighttime, daytime, rainy, nonrainy, run-off-road, and property-damage-only crashes. Total crash reduction is estimated to be 39.4%. Treatment effectiveness is greater for curves with radius less than or equal to 300 m and for curves with deflection angle greater than 60 gon (100 gon = 90°). Total crash reduction is estimated to be 52.2% for curves with radius less than or equal to 300 m and 51.0% for curves with deflection angle greater than 60 gon. The most effective treatment was the installation of curve warning signs, chevron signs, and sequential flashing beacons along the curve. The statistically significant estimate of total crash reduction for this treatment is 47.6%.

[1]  H. Akaike.  Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[2]  Jerry L Graham,et al.  ROADWAY DELINEATION PRACTICES HANDBOOK , 1994 .

[3]  Kenneth Wade Ogden,et al.  Safer Roads: A Guide to Road Safety Engineering , 1995 .

[4]  Thierry Brenac.  SAFETY AT CURVES AND ROAD GEOMETRY STANDARDS IN SOME EUROPEAN COUNTRIES , 1996 .

[5]  S-P Miaou,et al.  MEASURING THE GOODNESS-OF-FIT OF ACCIDENT PREDICTION MODELS , 1996 .

[6]  Shaw-Pin Miaou,et al.  Pitfalls of Using R2 to Evaluate Goodness of Fit of Accident Prediction Models , 1996 .

[7]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  OBSERVATIONAL BEFORE-AFTER STUDIES IN ROAD SAFETY -- ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF HIGHWAY AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING MEASURES ON ROAD SAFETY , 1997 .

[8]  Poul Greibe,et al.  SIGNING AND MARKING OF SUBSTANDARD HORIZONTAL CURVES ON RURAL ROADS , 1998 .

[9]  Ruediger Lamm,et al.  Highway Design and Traffic Safety Engineering Handbook , 1999 .

[10]  Rüdiger Lamm,et al.  ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION OF INTERRELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN TRAFFIC SAFETY AND HIGHWAY GEOMETRIC DESIGN ON TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS , 2000 .

[11]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Estimating Safety by the Empirical Bayes Method: A Tutorial , 2002 .

[12]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Statistical Road Safety Modeling , 2004 .

[13]  Paul J Carlson,et al.  Spacing Chevrons on Horizontal Curves , 2005 .

[14]  Kay Fitzpatrick,et al.  Roadway Safety Design Synthesis , 2005 .

[15]  Alfonso Montella.  Safety reviews of existing roads: Quantitative safety assessment methodology , 2005 .

[16]  Fred R Hanscom,et al.  Low-Cost Treatments for Horizontal Curve Safety , 2006 .

[17]  Richard W Lyles,et al.  Communicating Changes in Horizontal Alignment , 2006 .

[18]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Empirical Bayes before-after safety studies: lessons learned from two decades of experience and future directions. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Salvatore Cafiso,et al.  Safety Index for Evaluation of Two-Lane Rural Highways , 2007 .

[20]  Craig Lyon,et al.  Safety Effects of Targeted Program to Improve Skid Resistance , 2008 .

[21]  Alfonso Montella,et al.  Crash Prediction Models for Rural Motorways , 2008 .

[22]  法律.  Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices , 2010 .