Reconfigurable Parallel Printing System Design for Field Performance and Service Improvement

Parallel printing systems offer many advantages to users in terms of system uptime and overall productivity through continuous operation even when certain components of the system fail. Additionally, parallel printing system architectures allow for implementation of different field service policies, giving an important advantage to applications where system uptime is critical. In this paper, we present a case study for evaluating performance of reconfigurable parallel printing system concepts. The field performance of three parallel printing system concepts with varying degrees of modularity and various service policies are evaluated through simulation. It is concluded that developing an optimal service policy in conjunction with developing a modular reconfigurable printing architecture is key to obtaining optimal field performance.

[1]  Kevin Otto,et al.  An empirical foundation for product flexibility , 2005 .

[2]  Wheeler Ruml,et al.  On-line Planning and Scheduling: An Application to Controlling Modular Printers , 2008, AAAI.

[3]  Richard M. Feldman,et al.  A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single-unit systems , 1989 .

[4]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Design for Transformation: Theory, Method and Application , 2007 .

[5]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Use of Design Methods to Generate and Develop Missions for Morphing Aircraft , 2002 .

[6]  Kemper Lewis,et al.  Flexible and Reconfigurable Systems: Nomenclature and Review , 2007, DAC 2007.

[7]  Sridhar Kota,et al.  Generalized kinematic modeling of Reconfigurable Machine Tools , 2002 .

[8]  Rommert Dekker,et al.  Applications of maintenance optimization models : a review and analysis , 1996 .

[9]  Marc H. Meyer,et al.  The power of product platforms : building value and cost leadership , 1997 .

[10]  Markus P. J. Fromherz,et al.  Coordinated Control for Highly Reconfigurable Systems , 2005, HSCC.

[11]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  TRANSFORMATION FACILITATORS: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF RECONFIGURABLE PRODUCTS AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS , 2008, DAC 2008.

[12]  Eiichi Yoshida,et al.  M-TRAN: self-reconfigurable modular robotic system , 2002 .

[13]  R. S. Lashkari,et al.  Machine reliability and preventive maintenance planning for cellular manufacturing systems , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[15]  Karl Iagnemma,et al.  Reconfigurability in planetary surface vehicles : Modelling approaches and case study , 2006 .

[16]  Mehmet Savsar.  Effects of maintenance policies on the productivity of flexible manufacturing cells , 2006 .

[17]  Rong Zhou,et al.  Efficient waypoint tracking hybrid controllers for double integrators using classical time optimal control , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[18]  S. Kotha.  Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition , 1992 .

[19]  Mahmut Parlar,et al.  A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems , 1991 .