Interest-Rate Rules in an Estimated Sticky Price Model

This paper evaluates alternative rules by which the Fed may set interest rates using the small model of the U.S. economy estimated in Rotemberg and Woodford (1997). Our main substantive finding is that low and stable inflation together with stable interest rates can be achieved by letting the funds rate respond positively to inflation while also responding, with a coefficient bigger than one, to the lagged funds rate itself. A rule in which the interest rate is set in this extremely simple way does almost as well as a more complicated rule which is optimal in our setting, in the sense of maximizing expected utility to the representative household. Furthermore, when the funds rate responds to inflation only with a delay, due to delay in the availability of inflation data, performance under the rule is only slightly reduced.

[1]  Michael Woodford,et al.  An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy: Expanded Version , 1998 .

[2]  A. Haldane,et al.  Forward-Looking Rules for Monetary Policy , 1998 .

[3]  Brian P. Sack,et al.  Does the Fed act gradually? a VAR analysis , 1998 .

[4]  Jeffrey C. Fuhrer,et al.  Monetary Policy when Interest Rates Are Bounded at Zero , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[5]  J. Galí,et al.  Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence , 1997 .

[6]  M. Woodford,et al.  Inflation Forecasts and Monetary Policy , 1997 .

[7]  M. Feldstein.  Capital Income Taxes and the Benefit of Price Stability , 1997 .

[8]  Julio J. Rotemberg,et al.  An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy , 1997, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[9]  B. Mccallum,et al.  An Optimizing Is-Lm Specification for Monetary Policy and Business Cycle Analysis , 1997 .

[10]  Michael Woodford,et al.  Control of the Public Debt: A Requirement for Price Stability? , 1996 .

[11]  R. Shiller.  Why Do People Dislike Inflation? , 1996 .

[12]  Tack Yun,et al.  Nominal price rigidity, money supply endogeneity, and business cycles , 1996 .

[13]  Mark W. Watson,et al.  Money, Prices, Interest Rates and the Business Cycle , 1996 .

[14]  R. King,et al.  Limits on Interest Rate Rules in the IS Model , 1996 .

[15]  Glenn D. Rudebusch.  Federal Reserve interest rate targeting, rational expectations, and the term structure , 1995 .

[16]  Jeffrey C. Fuhrer,et al.  Monetary Policy Trade-offs and the Correlation between Nominal Interest Rates and Real Output , 1995 .

[17]  John B. Taylor.  Discretion versus policy rules in practice , 1993 .

[18]  R. Hall,et al.  Nominal Income Targeting , 1993 .

[19]  R. Bénabou,et al.  On Inflation and Output with Costly Price Changes: A Simple Unifying Result , 1993 .

[20]  L. Summers.  How Should Long Term Monetary Policy Be Determined , 1991 .

[21]  L. Ball,et al.  Credible Disinflation with Staggered Price Setting , 1990 .

[22]  C. Bean.  TARGETING NOMINAL INCOME: AN APPRAISAL* , 1983 .

[23]  G. Calvo.  Staggered prices in a utility-maximizing framework , 1983 .

[24]  C. Nelson,et al.  A new approach to decomposition of economic time series into permanent and transitory components with particular attention to measurement of the ‘business cycle’☆ , 1981 .

[25]  John B. Taylor.  ESTIMATION AND CONTROL OF A MACROECONOMIC MODEL WITH RATIONAL EXPECTATIONS , 1979 .

[26]  R. Lucas.  Econometric policy evaluation: A critique , 1976 .

[27]  A. Dixit,et al.  Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity , 1977 .

[28]  K. Wicksell.  The Influence of the Rate of Interest on Prices , 1907 .