Trial by trial effects in the antisaccade task

The antisaccade task requires participants to inhibit the reflexive tendency to look at a sudden onset target and instead direct their gaze to the opposite hemifield. As such it provides a convenient tool with which to investigate the cognitive and neural systems that support goal-directed behaviour. Recent models of cognitive control suggest that antisaccade performance on a single trial should vary as a function of the outcome (correct antisaccade or erroneous prosaccade) of the previous trial. In addition, repetition priming effects suggest that the spatial location of the target on the previous trial may also influence current trial performance. Thus an analysis of contingency effects in antisaccade performance may provide new insights into the factors that influence the monitoring and modulation of the antisaccade task and other ongoing behaviours. Using a multilevel modelling analysis we explored previous trial effects on current trial performance in a large antisaccade dataset. We found (1) repetition priming effects following correct antisaccades; (2) contrary to models of cognitive control antisaccade error rates were increased on trials following an error, suggesting that failures to adequately maintain the task goal can persist across more than one trial; and (3) current trial latencies varied according to the previous trial outcome (correct antisaccade, slowly corrected error or rapidly corrected error). These results are discussed in terms of current models of antisaccade performance and cognitive control and further demonstrate the utility of multilevel modelling for analysing antisaccade data.

[1]  M. Kerszberg,et al.  A Neuronal Model of a Global Workspace in Effortful Cognitive Tasks , 2001 .

[2]  J. Barton,et al.  The inter-trial effects of stimulus and saccadic direction on prosaccades and antisaccades, in controls and schizophrenia patients , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[3]  R. Carpenter,et al.  Countermanding saccades in humans , 1999, Vision Research.

[4]  Thomas F Münte,et al.  Time Course of Error Detection and Correction in Humans: Neurophysiological Evidence , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  E. Soetens.  Localizing sequential effects in serial choice reaction time with the information reduction procedure , 1998 .

[6]  M. Schlag-Rey,et al.  Antisaccade performance predicted by neuronal activity in the supplementary eye field , 1997, Nature.

[7]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  ERP components on reaction errors and their functional significance: a tutorial , 2000, Biological Psychology.

[8]  J. Findlay,et al.  Express saccades: is there a separate population in humans? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Why are antisaccades slower than prosaccades? A novel finding using a new paradigm , 2003, Neuroreport.

[10]  W. James.  The Principles of Psychology, Vol. I , 2008 .

[11]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Primary and secondary saccades to goals defined by instructions , 1978, Vision Research.

[12]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[13]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[14]  Ulrich Mayr,et al.  Conflict, consciousness, and control , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  D. Norman.  Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[16]  J. Hohnsbein,et al.  Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[17]  P. Rabbitt.  Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  R. Bosker.  Boekbespreking van "A.S. Bryk & S.W. Raudenbusch - Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods" : Sage Publications, Newbury Parki, London/New Delhi 1992 , 1995 .

[19]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[20]  D. Munoz,et al.  A neural correlate for the gap effect on saccadic reaction times in monkey. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Sensory biases produce alternation advantage found in sequential saccadic eye movement tasks , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[23]  H. Engelhardt,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.Anthony S. Bryk , Stephen W. Raudenbush , 1994 .

[24]  Christopher Kennard,et al.  Reflexive, symbolic, and affective contributions to eye movements during task switching: response selection. , 2004, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[25]  R. H. S. Carpenter,et al.  Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements , 1995, Nature.

[26]  R. Klein,et al.  A Model of Saccade Initiation Based on the Competitive Integration of Exogenous and Endogenous Signals in the Superior Colliculus , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  Bryan Rodgers,et al.  What does a Man do after he Makes an Error? An Analysis of Response Programming , 1977 .

[28]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  E. Awh,et al.  Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[30]  Katja Fiehler,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of error correction. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[31]  D. Munoz,et al.  Influence of stimulus eccentricity and direction on characteristics of pro- and antisaccades in non-human primates. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  B. Fischer,et al.  The recognition and correction of involuntary prosaccades in an antisaccade task , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  D P Munoz,et al.  Influence of previous visual stimulus or saccade on saccadic reaction times in monkey. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Error-related brain potentials are differentially related to awareness of response errors: evidence from an antisaccade task. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[35]  Cristina Massen,et al.  Parallel programming of exogenous and endogenous components in the antisaccade task , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[36]  Christopher Kennard,et al.  Eye Movements during Task Switching: Reflexive, Symbolic, and Affective Contributions to Response Selection , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  I. Evdokimidis,et al.  The antisaccade task in a sample of 2,006 young men , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[39]  D. F. Fisher,et al.  Eye movements : cognition and visual perception , 1982 .

[40]  Jillian H. Fecteau,et al.  Exploring the consequences of the previous trial , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  M. Leboyer,et al.  Conscious and subliminal conflicts in normal subjects and patients with schizophrenia: The role of the anterior cingulate , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[42]  C. Stefanis,et al.  The antisaccade task in a sample of 2,006 young males , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  T. Shallice,et al.  Human cingulate cortex and autonomic control: converging neuroimaging and clinical evidence. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[44]  D. Munoz,et al.  t Immediate Neural Plasticity Shapes Motor Performance , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  S. Everling,et al.  The antisaccade: a review of basic research and clinical studies , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  B. Fischer,et al.  Characteristics of “anti” saccades in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  S. Nieuwenhuis,et al.  A goal activation approach to the study of executive function: An application to antisaccade tasks , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[48]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[49]  D. Munoz,et al.  Look away: the anti-saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[50]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .