Tradeoffs between forestry resource and conservation values under alternate policy regimes: A spatial analysis of the western Canadian boreal plains

An important element of resource management and conservation is an understanding of the tradeoffs between marketed products, such as timber, and measures of environmental quality, such as biodiversity. In this paper, we develop an integrated economic-ecological spatial optimization model that we then apply to evaluate alternate forest policies on a 560,000km2 study region of managed boreal forest in Alberta and British Columbia, Canada. The integrated model incorporates dynamic forest sector harvesting, current levels of oil and gas sector development, coarse-filter or habitat-based old forest indicators, a set of empirical forest bird abundance models, and statistical models of the natural and current fire regimes. Using our integrated model, economic tradeoff curves, or production possibility frontiers, are developed to illustrate the cost of achieving coarse-filter targets by a set time (50 years) within a 100-year time horizon. We found levels of ecological indicators and economic returns from the timber industry could both be increased if spatial constraints imposed by the current policy environment were relaxed; other factors being equal, this implies current policy should be revised. We explore the production possibility frontier's relationship to the range of natural variation of old forest habitat, and show how this range can be used to guide choices of preferred locations along the frontier. We also show that coarse-filter constraints on the abundance of certain habitat elements are sufficient to satisfy some fine-filter objectives, expressed as the predicted abundances of various species of songbirds.

[1]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  OVERVIEW OF THE USE OF NATURAL VARIABILITY CONCEPTS IN MANAGING ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[2]  Richard G. Derwent,et al.  Radiative forcing in the 21st century due to ozone changes in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere , 2003 .

[3]  Mark S. Boyce,et al.  Ecosystem management: applications for sustainable forest and wildlife resources , 1999 .

[4]  Michael Patriksson,et al.  Ergodic, primal convergence in dual subgradient schemes for convex programming , 1999, Mathematical programming.

[5]  K. Gaston,et al.  Integrating Costs of Conservation into InternationalPriority Setting , 2000 .

[6]  Frédérik Doyon,et al.  A Review of Spatial Distribution Guidelines for the Managed Canadian Boreal Forest , 2006 .

[7]  K. Hirsch,et al.  Large forest fires in Canada, 1959–1997 , 2002 .

[8]  R. Carson Contingent Valuation: A User's Guide† , 1999 .

[9]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  Biodiversity and Timber in the Coast Range of Oregon: Inside the Production Possibility Frontier , 2003, Land Economics.

[10]  Stefan Baumgärtner,et al.  Ecological‐Economic Modeling for Biodiversity Management: Potential, Pitfalls, and Prospects , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[11]  Philip J. Burton,et al.  Boreal mixedwood forests may have no representative areas : some implications for reserve design , 1996 .

[12]  Marian L. Weber,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Tradable Landuse Rights for Biodiversity Conservation: An Application to Canada's Boreal Mixedwood Forest , 2004 .

[13]  Andrew Fall,et al.  Comparing static versus dynamic protected areas in the Québec boreal forest , 2008 .

[14]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  Modeling joint production of wildlife and timber , 2004 .

[15]  J. Douglas Brodie,et al.  Land Value and the Linkage between Stand and Forest Level Analyses , 1989 .

[16]  F. Schmiegelow,et al.  Generalizability of songbird habitat models in boreal mixedwood forests of Alberta , 2008 .

[17]  S. Polasky,et al.  Selecting Biological Reserves Cost-Effectively: An Application to Terrestrial Vertebrate Conservation in Oregon , 2001, Land Economics.

[18]  Monique Guignard-Spielberg,et al.  A Problem of Forest Harvesting and Road Building Solved Through Model Strengthening and Lagrangean Relaxation , 2003, Oper. Res..

[19]  D. Lindenmayer,et al.  General management principles and a checklist of strategies to guide forest biodiversity conservation , 2006 .

[20]  R. Haight,et al.  Exploring Strategies for Improving the Cost Effectiveness of Endangered Species Management: The Kirtland's Warbler as a Case Study , 2000 .

[21]  G. Armstrong Sustainability of timber supply considering the risk of wildfire , 2004 .

[22]  E. Gunn,et al.  A model and Tabu search method to optimize stand harvest and road construction schedules , 2000 .

[23]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Towards sustainable management of the boreal forest. , 2003 .

[24]  Dietmar W. Rose,et al.  A simulation approach for optimal timber management scheduling , 1984 .

[25]  S. Hannon,et al.  Using the focal species approach for conserving biodiversity in landscapes managed for forestry 1 , 2002 .

[26]  Steven G. Cumming,et al.  GAP DYNAMICS IN BOREAL ASPEN STANDS: IS THE FOREST OLDER THAN WE THINK? , 2000 .

[27]  Y. Haila,et al.  Preserving ecological diversity in boreal forests: ecological background, research, and management , 1994 .

[28]  Matthew G. Betts,et al.  The importance of spatial autocorrelation, extent and resolution in predicting forest bird occurrence , 2006 .

[29]  Steve Cumming,et al.  Statistical models of landscape pattern metrics, with applications to regional scale dynamic forest simulations , 2002, Landscape Ecology.

[30]  M. L. Hunter Natural fire regimes as spatial models for managing boreal forests , 1993 .

[31]  Wiktor L. Adamowicz,et al.  Sustainable management of Canada's boreal forests: Progress and prospects1 , 2006 .

[32]  W. Adamowicz,et al.  Coarse Filter Ecosystem Management in a Nonequilibrating Forest , 2003, Forest Science.

[33]  S. Boutin,et al.  Managing the cumulative impacts of land uses in the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin: A modeling approach. , 2003 .

[34]  Grant K. Hauer,et al.  Tailoring A Decomposition Method To A Large Forest Management Scheduling Problem In Northern Ontario. , 1996 .

[35]  Fiona K. A. Schmiegelow,et al.  ARE BOREAL BIRDS RESILIENT TO FOREST FRAGMENTATION? AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF SHORT‐TERM COMMUNITY RESPONSES , 1997 .

[36]  S. Cumming FOREST TYPE AND WILDFIRE IN THE ALBERTA BOREAL MIXEDWOOD: WHAT DO FIRES BURN? , 2001 .

[37]  F. Messier,et al.  Identification and description of forested vegetation communities available to woodland caribou: relating wildlife habitat to forest cover data , 1997 .

[38]  M. Luckert,et al.  A restricted Leontief profit function model of the Canadian lumber and chip industry: potential impacts of US countervail and Kyoto ratification , 2004 .

[39]  J. Eadie,et al.  USING SPECIES–HABITAT MODELS TO TARGET CONSERVATION: A CASE STUDY WITH BREEDING MALLARDS , 2004 .

[40]  Steven G. Cumming,et al.  A parametric model of the fire-size distribution , 2001 .

[41]  Hugh P Possingham,et al.  Sensitivity of Marine‐Reserve Design to the Spatial Resolution of Socioeconomic Data , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[42]  Steven G. Cumming,et al.  Effective fire suppression in boreal forests , 2005 .

[43]  Dietmar W. Rose,et al.  A methodology for estimating production possibility frontiers for wildlife habitat and timber value at the landscape level , 1996 .

[44]  W. J. Reed,et al.  Optimal harvest scheduling at the forest level in the presence of the risk of fire , 1986 .

[45]  Amy W. Ando,et al.  Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation , 1998, Science.

[46]  Marc E. McDill,et al.  Finding the Efficient Frontier of a Bi-Criteria, Spatially Explicit, Harvest Scheduling Problem , 2006, Forest Science.

[47]  S. Polasky,et al.  CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES , 2005 .

[48]  Claire A. Montgomery,et al.  Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns , 2008 .

[49]  S. Cumming,et al.  Divided landbase, overlapping tenures, and fire risk , 2004 .

[50]  C. Messier,et al.  Forest management planning based on natural disturbance and forest dynamics. , 2003 .

[51]  Magnus Nyström,et al.  Reserves, Resilience and Dynamic Landscapes , 2003, Ambio.