Calibration of Multi-Axis MEMS Force Sensors Using the Shape-From-Motion Method

Precise calibration of multi-axis microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) force sensors is difficult for several reasons, including the need to apply many known force vectors at precise orientations at the micro- and nanoNewton (nN) force scales, and the risk of damaging the small, fragile microdevices. To tackle these challenges, this paper introduces the shape-from-motion calibration method. A new design of a two-axis MEMS capacitive force sensor with high linearity and nN resolutions is presented. Structural-electrostatic coupled-field simulations are conducted in order to optimize the sensor design. The designed sensor is calibrated with the shape-from-motion method, the least-squares method as well as the gravity-based method for comparison purposes. Calibration results demonstrate that the shape-from-motion method provides a rapid, practical, and accurate technique for calibrating multi-axis MEMS sensors

[1]  D. Anselmetti,et al.  Binding strength between cell adhesion proteoglycans measured by atomic force microscopy , 1995, Science.

[2]  K. Pister,et al.  Surface micromachined polysilicon heart cell force transducer , 2000, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[3]  Michael W. Berns,et al.  Laser trapping in cell biology , 1990 .

[4]  C Tomasi,et al.  Shape and motion from image streams: a factorization method. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  Toshio Yanagida,et al.  Force measurements by micromanipulation of a single actin filament by glass needles , 1988, Nature.

[6]  D. Odde,et al.  Tensile force-dependent neurite elicitation via anti-beta1 integrin antibody-coated magnetic beads. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[7]  Andres F. Oberhauser,et al.  The molecular elasticity of the extracellular matrix protein tenascin , 1998, Nature.

[8]  Rajesh Rajamani,et al.  Travel range extension of a MEMS electrostatic microactuator , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[9]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Multiple- and single-molecule analysis of the actomyosin motor by nanometer-piconewton manipulation with a microneedle: unitary steps and forces. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[10]  D E Ingber,et al.  Analysis of cell mechanics in single vinculin-deficient cells using a magnetic tweezer. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[11]  J Conia,et al.  The micro‐robotic laboratory: Optical trapping and scissing for the biologist , 1997, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.

[12]  J. D. Morrow,et al.  The Shape from Motion Approach to Rapid and Precise Force/Torque Sensor Calibration , 1997 .

[13]  H. Craighead,et al.  Microfabricated cantilevers for measurement of subcellular and molecular forces , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  R. Waugh,et al.  A piconewton force transducer and its application to measurement of the bending stiffness of phospholipid membranes , 1996, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Bradley J. Nelson,et al.  A bulk microfabricated multi-axis capacitive cellular force sensor using transverse comb drives , 2002 .

[16]  T. Yanagida,et al.  Subpiconewton intermolecular force microscopy. , 1997, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[17]  D. P. Potasek,et al.  Characterizing fruit fly flight behavior using a microforce sensor with a new comb-drive configuration , 2005, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems.

[18]  E. Evans,et al.  Looking inside molecular bonds at biological interfaces with dynamic force spectroscopy. , 1999, Biophysical chemistry.

[19]  R. Hochmuth,et al.  Micropipette aspiration of living cells. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  P. Lehenkari,et al.  Atomic force microscopy can be used to mechanically stimulate osteoblasts and evaluate cellular strain distributions. , 2001, Ultramicroscopy.