Data agency at stake: MyData activism and alternative frames of equal participation

Data activism has emerged as a response to asymmetries in how data and the means of knowledge production are distributed. This article examines MyData, a data activism initiative developing principles for a new technical and commercial ecosystem in which individuals control the use of personal data. Analyzing material collected at a formative event shaping MyData activism, we examine how more just data arrangements are framed to enhance equal participation. Our analysis shows agreement on what is ultimately at stake: individual data agency and fair competition in the data economy. However, two alternatives are offered for what participation involves. Collaboration with commercial actors favors framing participation as agency in data markets, thereby potentially limiting the scope of what is at stake. The alternative framing presents a rights-based understanding of economic and civic agency, potentially leading to a broader understanding of participation in a datafied society.

[1]  Tuukka Lehtiniemi,et al.  The social imaginaries of data activism , 2019, Big Data Soc..

[2]  Frank A. Pasquale,et al.  [89WashLRev0001] The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions , 2014 .

[3]  Sarah Myers West,et al.  Data Capitalism: Redefining the Logics of Surveillance and Privacy , 2019 .

[4]  David Beer,et al.  Envisioning the power of data analytics , 2018 .

[5]  Zeynep Tufekci,et al.  Engineering the public: Big data, surveillance and computational politics , 2014, First Monday.

[6]  John W. Meyer,et al.  The “Actors” of Modern Society: The Cultural Construction of Social Agency* , 2000 .

[7]  Tuukka Lehtiniemi,et al.  Personal Data Spaces: An Intervention in Surveillance Capitalism? , 2017 .

[8]  Stefania Milan,et al.  Technopolitics in the age of big data , 2018 .

[9]  Mark Andrejevic,et al.  The big data divide , 2014 .

[10]  Jo Bates,et al.  The Domestication of Open Government Data Advocacy in the United Kingdom: A Neo-Gramscian Analysis , 2013 .

[11]  Gina Neff,et al.  Technologies for Sharing: lessons from Quantified Self about the political economy of platforms , 2016 .

[12]  Julie A. Nelson,et al.  The Study of Choice or the Study of Provisioning? Gender and the Definition of Economics , 1993 .

[13]  Matti Nelimarkka,et al.  Live Participation: Augmenting Events with Audience-Performer Interaction Systems , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[14]  Helen Kennedy,et al.  Living with Data: Aligning Data Studies and Data Activism Through a Focus on Everyday Experiences of Datafication , 2018 .

[15]  Nancy Fraser,et al.  Abnormal Justice , 2008, Critical Inquiry.

[16]  S. Coll.  Power, knowledge, and the subjects of privacy: understanding privacy as the ally of surveillance , 2014 .

[17]  Matthew Crain,et al.  The limits of transparency: Data brokers and commodification , 2018, New Media Soc..

[18]  Lina Dencik,et al.  Surveillance Realism and the Politics of Imagination: Is There No Alternative? , 2018, Krisis | Journal for Contemporary Philosophy.

[19]  Tamar Sharon,et al.  From data fetishism to quantifying selves: Self-tracking practices and the other values of data , 2017, New Media Soc..

[20]  Josh Whitford,et al.  Profit and Gift in the Digital Economy , 2018 .

[21]  D. Snow,et al.  Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment , 2000 .

[22]  L. Taylor.  What is data justice? The case for connecting digital rights and freedoms globally , 2017, Big Data Soc..

[23]  Dawn Nafus,et al.  This One Does Not Go Up to 11: The Quantified Self Movement as an Alternative Big Data Practice , 2014 .

[24]  D. Silverman.  Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[25]  Adam Croom,et al.  MyData - A Nordic Model for human-centered personal data management and processing , 2017 .

[26]  Frank A. Pasquale,et al.  Two Narratives of Platform Capitalism , 2017 .

[27]  Jun Yu,et al.  Deconstructing datafication’s brave new world , 2018, New Media Soc..

[28]  Hamed Haddadi,et al.  Enabling the new economic actor: data protection, the digital economy, and the Databox , 2016, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[29]  Joseph Lampel,et al.  Field-Configuring Events as Structuring Mechanisms: How Conferences, Ceremonies, and Trade Shows Constitute New Technologies, Industries, and Marketsguest Editors Introduction , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[30]  David J. Hess,et al.  Technology- and Product-Oriented Movements: Approximating Social Movement Studies and Science and Technology Studies , 2005 .

[31]  Anne Kaun,et al.  Digital activism: After the hype , 2018, New Media Soc..

[32]  Andrew R. Schrock,et al.  Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: A history from publicity to open government data , 2016, New Media Soc..

[33]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[34]  Hector Postigo,et al.  CULTURAL PRODUCTION AND THE DIGITAL RIGHTS MOVEMENT , 2012 .

[35]  D. Zwick,et al.  Creating Worlds that Create Audiences: Theorising Personal Data Markets in the Age of Communicative Capitalism , 2018, tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society.

[36]  Jeffrey Alan Johnson,et al.  From open data to information justice , 2014, Ethics and Information Technology.

[37]  John M. Cinnamon,et al.  Social Injustice in Surveillance Capitalism , 2017 .

[38]  Stefania Milan,et al.  The Alternative Epistemologies of Data Activism , 2016 .

[39]  J. Dijck.  Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology , 2014 .

[40]  Jathan Sadowski.  When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction , 2019, Big Data Soc..

[41]  Mark Coté,et al.  Hacking the social life of Big Data , 2015, Big Data Soc..

[42]  R. Garud.  Conferences as Venues for the Configuration of Emerging Organizational Fields: The Case of Cochlear Implants , 2008 .

[43]  Yana Breindl,et al.  ASSESSING SUCCESS IN INTERNET CAMPAIGNING , 2013 .

[44]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland , 2017, GeoJournal.

[45]  N. Fligstein,et al.  Social Skill and the Theory of Fields* , 2001 .

[46]  Stefan Baack.  Datafication and empowerment: How the open data movement re-articulates notions of democracy, participation, and journalism , 2015 .

[47]  Lina Dencik,et al.  Towards data justice? The ambiguity of anti-surveillance resistance in political activism , 2016, Big Data Soc..

[48]  Barbara J Evans,et al.  Power to the People: Data Citizens in the Age of Precision Medicine. , 2017, Vanderbilt journal of entertainment and technology law.

[49]  Raimondo Iemma.  Towards personal data services: a view on some enabling factors , 2016 .