Activity levels are higher after osteochondral autograft transfer mosaicplasty than after microfracture for articular cartilage defects of the knee: a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND There is limited information regarding direct comparisons of the outcome of osteochondral autograft transfer (OAT) mosaicplasty and microfracture for the treatment of isolated articular cartilage defects of the knee. The purpose of this retrospective comparative study was to compare the general health outcomes, knee function, and Marx Activity Rating Scale scores for patients treated with OAT or microfracture for symptomatic chondral defects of the femoral condyles or trochlea. We hypothesized that the patients in the two treatment groups would have similar clinical outcomes at intermediate-term follow-up. METHODS Ninety-six patients with full-thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyles or trochlea were treated with either OAT mosaicplasty (n = 48) or microfracture (n = 48). The average age of the patients (thirty-two male and sixteen female in each group) at the time of surgery was 29.7 years in the OAT group and 32.5 years in the microfracture group. Patients were prospectively evaluated at baseline and at one, two, three, and five years postoperatively with use of validated clinical outcome measures including the Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical component, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Outcome Survey activities of daily living, and Marx Activity Rating Scale instruments. Comparisons between outcomes before and after treatment or between outcomes after microfracture and mosaicplasty were made with use of two-tailed tests. RESULTS At the time of the latest follow-up, both groups demonstrated significant increases in SF-36 physical component, Knee Outcome Survey activities of daily living, and IKDC scores compared with baseline. These scores did not differ significantly between the two groups at any of the follow-up time points. However, the OAT group demonstrated a significantly greater improvement in the Marx Activity Rating Scale scores from baseline to the two-year (p = 0.001), three-year (p = 0.03), and five-year (p = 0.02) time points compared with the microfracture group. CONCLUSIONS In the present retrospective comparative study, the hypothesis that patients treated with microfracture or OAT mosaicplasty for symptomatic articular cartilage defects of the femoral condyles or trochlea would have similar clinical outcomes at intermediate-term follow-up was affirmed for general health outcome and for knee function. However, patients treated with OAT mosaicplasty maintained a superior level of athletic activity compared with those treated with microfracture.

[1]  N. Südkamp,et al.  Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee. , 2006, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[2]  K. Briggs,et al.  Microfracture to treat full-thickness chondral defects: surgical technique, rehabilitation, and outcomes. , 2002, The journal of knee surgery.

[3]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[4]  C. McHorney,et al.  The MOS 36‐Item Short‐Form Health Survey (SF‐36): II. Psychometric and Clinical Tests of Validity in Measuring Physical and Mental Health Constructs , 1993, Medical care.

[5]  A. Flatt Restoration of Rheumatoid Finger-Joint Function: Interim Report on Trial of Prosthetic Replacement , 1961 .

[6]  W. Dunn,et al.  Treatment of Focal Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  Lars Engebretsen,et al.  A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at five years. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  M. Spector,et al.  Histologic analysis of tissue after failed cartilage repair procedures. , 1999, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[9]  E. Stankevičius,et al.  A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes. , 2005, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[10]  E. Stankevičius,et al.  Osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects in the knee joint in athletes , 2006, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[11]  Brian J Cole,et al.  Overview of Existing Cartilage Repair Technology , 2008, Sports medicine and arthroscopy review.

[12]  T. Wickiewicz,et al.  Contact Pressures at Osteochondral Donor Sites in the Knee , 1998, The American journal of sports medicine.

[13]  R. Cancedda,et al.  Comparative Evaluation of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Mosaicplasty: A Multicentered Randomized Clinical Trial , 2005, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[14]  L. Hangody,et al.  Autologous Osteochondral Mosaicplasty for the Treatment of Full-Thickness Defects of Weight-Bearing Joints: Ten Years of Experimental and Clinical Experience , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  Bert R. Mandelbaum,et al.  Clinical Efficacy of the Microfracture Technique for Articular Cartilage Repair in the Knee , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[16]  G. Vásárhelyi,et al.  Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty. Surgical technique. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[17]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  Development and Evaluation of an Activity Rating Scale for Disorders of the Knee , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[18]  J. Steadman,et al.  Early Events in Cartilage Repair After Subchondral Bone Microfracture , 2003, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  L. Hangody,et al.  Mosaicplasty for the treatment of articular cartilage defects: application in clinical practice. , 1998, Orthopedics.

[20]  J. Chow,et al.  Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral transplantation for treating knee cartilage defects: a 2- to 5-year follow-up study. , 2004, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[21]  B. F. Morrey,et al.  High-Impact Athletics After Knee Articular Cartilage Repair: A Prospective Evaluation of the Microfracture Technique , 2008 .

[22]  J. Steadman,et al.  Treatment of articular cartilage defects in athletes: an analysis of functional outcome and lesion appearance. , 1998, Orthopedics.

[23]  Konrad Malinowski,et al.  Treatment of full thickness chondral lesions of the knee with microfracture in a group of athletes , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[24]  R. Hawkins,et al.  The microfracture technique in the treatment of full-thickness chondral lesions of the knee in National Football League players. , 2003, The journal of knee surgery.

[25]  B. Cole,et al.  A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[27]  G. Vásárhelyi,et al.  Autologous osteochondral mosaicplasty. Surgical technique. , 2004, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[28]  M. Keith,et al.  American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[29]  J. Cioppa-Mosca,et al.  Postsurgical rehabilitation guidelines for the orthopedic clinician , 2006 .

[30]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  The microfracture technique for the treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee. A prospective cohort study. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  Maurilio Marcacci,et al.  Patellofemoral Full-Thickness Chondral Defects Treated With Second-Generation Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[32]  J. Steadman,et al.  Arthroscopic subchondral bone plate microfracture technique augments healing of large chondral defects in the radial carpal bone and medial femoral condyle of horses. , 1999, Veterinary surgery : VS.

[33]  B. Beynnon,et al.  IKDC or KOOS? Which measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients? , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[34]  R. E. Outerbridge The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. , 1961, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[35]  S. Nehrer Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[36]  D. Karataglis,et al.  Autologous osteochondral transplantation for the treatment of chondral defects of the knee. , 2006, The Knee.

[37]  M. Marcacci,et al.  Knee osteochondral autologous transplantation: long-term MR findings and clinical correlations. , 2010, European journal of radiology.

[38]  Stephen J. Lee,et al.  Complex knee reconstruction: articular cartilage treatment options. , 2003, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[39]  J. Richmond,et al.  Development and Validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form * , 2001, The American journal of sports medicine.

[40]  G. Vásárhelyi,et al.  Autologous osteochondral grafting--technique and long-term results. , 2008, Injury.

[41]  R. Jakob,et al.  Autologous Osteochondral Grafting in the Knee: Indication, Results, and Reflections , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[42]  L. Hangody,et al.  Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects A preliminary report , 1997, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[43]  Edward C. Jones,et al.  Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Four Knee Outcome Scales for Athletic Patients , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[44]  M. Kocher,et al.  Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. , 2003, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[45]  M. Brittberg,et al.  Two- to 9-Year Outcome After Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation of the Knee , 2000, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[46]  H J Mankin,et al.  Articular cartilage: degeneration and osteoarthritis, repair, regeneration, and transplantation. , 1998, Instructional course lectures.

[47]  B. Mandelbaum,et al.  Articular Cartilage Repair in Soccer Players with Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation , 2005, The American journal of sports medicine.

[48]  D. Saris,et al.  Treatment Selection in Articular Cartilage Lesions of the Knee , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.