Extended consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating seismic responses of one-way asymmetric plan tall buildings considering soil-structure interaction

Performance based design becomes an effective method for estimating seismic demands of buildings. In asymmetric plan tall building the effects of higher modes and torsion are crucial. The consecutive modal pushover (CMP) procedure is one of the procedures that consider these effects. Also in previous studies the influence of soil-structure interaction (SSI) in pushover analysis is ignored. In this paper the CMP procedure is modified for one-way asymmetric plan mid and high-rise buildings considering SSI. The extended CMP (ECMP) procedure is proposed in order to overcome some limitations of the CMP procedure. In this regard, 10, 15 and 20 story buildings with asymmetric plan are studied considering SSI assuming three different soil conditions. Using nonlinear response history analysis under a set of bidirectional ground motion; the exact responses of these buildings are calculated. Then the ECMP procedure is evaluated by comparing the results of this procedure with nonlinear time history results as an exact solution as well as the modal pushover analysis procedure and FEMA 356 load patterns. The results demonstrate the accuracy of the ECMP procedure.

[1]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric‐plan buildings , 2004 .

[2]  Sashi K. Kunnath,et al.  Adaptive Modal Combination Procedure for Nonlinear Static Analysis of Building Structures , 2006 .

[3]  B. Riley,et al.  EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY , 2009 .

[4]  M. Nuray Aydinoğlu.  An Incremental Response Spectrum Analysis Procedure Based on Inelastic Spectral Displacements for Multi-Mode Seismic Performance Evaluation , 2003 .

[5]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[6]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Earthquake response analysis of multistorey buildings including foundation interaction , 1974 .

[7]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  SIMPLE PUSH‐OVER ANALYSIS OF ASYMMETRIC BUILDINGS , 1997 .

[8]  R. Sharpe.  Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings , 1994 .

[9]  Faramarz Khoshnoudian,et al.  A consecutive modal pushover procedure for nonlinear static analysis of one-way unsymmetric-plan tall building structures , 2011 .

[10]  J. Bielak.  Dynamic response of non-linear building-foundation systems , 1978 .

[11]  Mario E. Rodriguez,et al.  Seismic response and damage analysis of buildings supported on flexible soils , 2000 .

[12]  M. Selim Günay,et al.  Generalized force vectors for multi‐mode pushover analysis , 2011 .

[13]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Static pushover versus dynamic collapse analysis of RC buildings , 2001 .

[14]  Jui-Liang Lin,et al.  Simplified seismic analysis of asymmetric building systems , 2007 .

[15]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Three‐dimensional modal pushover analysis of buildings subjected to two components of ground motion, including its evaluation for tall buildings , 2011 .

[16]  Bungale S. Taranath,et al.  Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, ANSI/AISC 341-10 , 2016 .

[17]  Luis Eduardo Pérez-Rocha,et al.  Soil–structure interaction in yielding systems , 2003 .

[18]  N. Null.  Seismic Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings , 2007 .

[19]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings , 2002 .

[20]  Faramarz Khoshnoudian,et al.  A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings , 2009 .

[21]  N. Null.  Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures , 2003 .

[22]  Lili Xie,et al.  An improved modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands of structures , 2008 .

[23]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Structural and Geotechnical Mechanics , 1978 .

[24]  Mohammad T. Rahmani,et al.  Alternative solution for kinematic interaction problem of soil–structure systems with embedded foundation , 2013 .

[25]  Merit P. White.  Earthquake engineering researchComm. on Earthquake Engineering Research Natl. Acad. of Eng.; National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D. C., 1969, 313 pp., $3 , 1970 .

[26]  Ming Wei Liu,et al.  An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings , 2004 .

[27]  Milos Novak,et al.  Effect of soil on structural response to wind and earthquake , 1974 .

[28]  J. Wolf.  Dynamic soil-structure interaction , 1985 .

[29]  Iztok Peruš,et al.  TORSIONAL EFFECTS IN THE PUSHOVER-BASED SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF BUILDINGS , 2005 .

[30]  Abdolreza S. Moghadam,et al.  Pushover procedure for seismic analysis of buildings , 1998 .

[31]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance-Based Seismic Design , 2000 .

[32]  John P. Wolf,et al.  Foundation Vibration Analysis: A Strength of Materials Approach , 2004 .

[33]  Faramarz Khoshnoudian,et al.  Assessment of modified consecutive modal pushover analysis for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings with dual system considering steel concentrically braced frames , 2012 .

[34]  Faramarz Khoshnoudian,et al.  Modified consecutive modal pushover procedure for seismic investigation of one-way asymmetric-plan tall buildings , 2012, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration.

[35]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  The extended N2 method taking into account higher mode effects in elevation , 2011 .

[36]  Ricardo M.S.F. Almeida,et al.  Pushover analysis of asymmetric three‐dimensional building frames , 2005 .

[37]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Evaluation of a Modified MPA Procedure Assuming Higher Modes as Elastic to Estimate Seismic Demands , 2004 .