On the Origins of Competitive Advantage: Strategic Factor Markets and Heterogeneous Resource Complementarity

Strategic factor market theory suggests that in the absence of luck, asymmetric expectations are a necessary condition for firms to appropriate gains from valuable resources. I argue that this is only true in the absence of heterogeneous resource complementarity. Extending factor market theory, I show that firms can profit when they exhibit superior complementarity to target resources, even in the absence of asymmetric expectations, and I determine the components of appropriated value in such markets. I thus demonstrate the power and simplicity of coalitional analysis, while shedding light on central concepts in strategic management discourse.

[1]  Ron Adner,et al.  A demand‐based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage , 2006 .

[2]  Gautam Ahuja,et al.  Managerial Foresight and Attempted Rent Appropriation: Insider Trading on Knowledge of Imminent Breakthroughs , 2005 .

[3]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[4]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management , 1992 .

[5]  Marina Núñez,et al.  Buyer-seller exactness in the assignment game , 2003, Int. J. Game Theory.

[6]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[7]  K. R. Conner A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[8]  Peter Zemsky,et al.  The Horizontal Scope of the Firm: Organizational Tradeoffs vs. Buyer-Supplier Relationships , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[9]  T. E. S. Raghavan,et al.  Assignment games with stable core , 2001, Int. J. Game Theory.

[10]  Olav Sorenson,et al.  Brokers and Competitive Advantage , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset Stock Accumulation and the Sustainability of Competitive Advantage: Reply , 1989 .

[12]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Strategic Factor Market Intelligence: An Application of Information Economics to Strategy Formulation and Competitor Intelligence , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[13]  Tailan Chi Trading in strategic resources: Necessary conditions, transaction cost problems, and choice of exchange structure , 1994 .

[14]  J. Barney Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[15]  L. Capron,et al.  When do acquirers earn abnormal returns , 2002 .

[16]  Margaret A. Peteraf The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[17]  Christina Fang,et al.  The Economics of Strategic Opportunity , 2003 .

[18]  R. Coff When Competitive Advantage Doesn't Lead to Performance: The Resource-Based View and Stakeholder Bargaining Power , 1999 .

[19]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Two-Sided Matching: A Study in Game-Theoretic Modeling and Analysis , 1990 .

[20]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Asset accumulation, interdependence and technological change: evidence from pharmaceutical drug discovery , 2002 .

[21]  Jan Eeckhout,et al.  Local Supermodularity and Unique Assortative Matching , 2006 .

[22]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[23]  Carles Rafels,et al.  The assignment game: the τ-value , 2003, Int. J. Game Theory.

[24]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[25]  Laurence Capron,et al.  Acquisitions of private vs. public firms: Private information, target selection, and acquirer returns , 2007 .

[26]  Martin Shubik,et al.  The Assignment Game , 1971 .

[27]  J. Barney Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? Yes , 2001 .

[28]  Margaret A. Peteraf,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/mde.1126 Unraveling The Resource-Based Tangle , 2022 .

[29]  M. D. Ryall,et al.  Do New Competitors, New Customers, New Suppliers, ... Sustain, Destroy or Create Competitive Advantage? , 2006 .

[30]  David J. Miller,et al.  An asymmetry‐based view of advantage: towards an attainable sustainability , 2003 .

[31]  Richard Makadok Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[32]  J. Barney Asset stocks and sustained competitive advantage: a comment , 1989 .

[33]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Biform Games , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Returns to bidding firms in mergers and acquisitions: Reconsidering the relatedness hypothesis , 1988 .

[35]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[36]  Marina Núñez A note on the nucleolus and the kernel of the assignment game , 2004, Int. J. Game Theory.

[37]  Adam Brandenburger,et al.  Value-based Business Strategy , 2005 .

[38]  Michael D. Ryall,et al.  How Do Value Creation and Competition Determine Whether a Firm Appropriates Value? , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[39]  K. Tan,et al.  Buyer‐supplier relationships: The impact of supplier selection and buyer‐supplier engagement on relationship and firm performance , 2006 .

[40]  S. Lippman,et al.  A BARGAINING PERSPECTIVE ON RESOURCE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[41]  L. Shapley,et al.  The assignment game I: The core , 1971 .