New Insights Into Polymer Rheology in Porous Media

This paper (SPE 129200) was accepted for presentation at the SPE Symposium on Improved Oil Recovery, Tulsa, 24–28 April 2010, and revised for publication. Original manuscript received for review 18 January 2010. Revised manuscript received for review 15 June 2010. Paper peer approved 21 June 2010. Summary This paper clarifies the rheology of xanthan and partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide (HPAM) solutions in porous media, especially at low velocities. Previous literature reported resistance factors (effective viscosities in porous media) and an apparent shear thinning at low fluxes that were noticeably greater than what is expected on the basis of viscosity measurements. The polymer component that causes the latter behavior is shown to propagate quite slowly and generally will not penetrate deep into a formation. Particularly for HPAM solutions, this behavior can be reduced or eliminated for solutions that experience mechanical degradation or flow through a few feet of porous rock. Under practical conditions where HPAM is used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR), the degree of shear thinning is slight or nonexistent, especially compared to the level of shear thickening that occurs at high fluxes.

[1]  D. J. Pye Improved Secondary Recovery by Control of Water Mobility , 1964 .

[2]  W. B. Gogarty Mobility Control With Polymer Solutions , 1967 .

[3]  F. Smith,et al.  The Behavior of Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide Solutions in Porous Media , 1970 .

[4]  T. J. West,et al.  Factors Influencing Mobility Control By Polymer Solutions , 1971 .

[5]  John M. Marker Dependence of Polymer Retention on Flow Rate , 1973 .

[6]  Gary A. Pope,et al.  ANALYSIS OF FACTORS INFLUENCING MOBILITY AND ADSORPTION IN THE FLOW OF POLYMER SOLUTION THROUGH POROUS MEDIA. , 1974 .

[7]  William W. Graessley The Entanglement Concept in Polymer Rheology , 1974 .

[8]  J. Maerker Shear Degradation of Partially Hydrolyzed Polyacrylamide Solutions , 1975 .

[9]  D. W. Peaceman,et al.  Evaluation of Polymer Flooding in a Layered Reservoir With Crossflow, Retention, and Degradation , 1976 .

[10]  J. Maerker Mechanical degradation of partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide solutions in unconsolidated porous media , 1976 .

[11]  Guy Chauveteau,et al.  Molecular Interpretation of Several Different Properties of Flow of Coiled Polymer Solutions Through Porous Media in Oil Recovery Conditions , 1981 .

[12]  Franz Durst,et al.  Laminar and turbulent flows of dilute polymer solutions: A physical model , 1982 .

[13]  Guy Chauveteau,et al.  Rodlike Polymer Solution Flow through Fine Pores: Influence of Pore Size on Rheological Behavior , 1982 .

[14]  R. Seright The Effects of Mechanical Degradation and Viscoelastic Behavior on Injectivity of Polyacrylamide Solutions , 1983 .

[15]  E. Klaus,et al.  Flow of polymer solutions in porous media: inadequacy of the capillary model , 1983 .

[16]  G. Chauveteau,et al.  Influence of microgels in polysaccharide solutions on their flow behavior through porous media , 1984 .

[17]  R. Rosmalen,et al.  Quantification of viscoelastic effects of polyacrylamide solutions , 1984 .

[18]  A. Zaitoun,et al.  The Role of Adsorption in Polymer Propagation Through Reservoir Rocks , 1987 .

[19]  Jeff Southwick,et al.  Molecular degradation, injectivity, and elastic properties of polymer solutions , 1988 .

[20]  Chun Huh,et al.  Prediction of Xanthan Rheology in Porous Media , 1988 .

[21]  Kamy Sepehrnoori,et al.  Dependence of polymer apparent viscosity on the permeable media and flow conditions , 1990 .

[22]  R. Seright Effect of Rheology on Gel Placement , 1991 .

[23]  Kenneth Stuart Sorbie,et al.  Polymer-improved oil recovery , 1991 .

[24]  G. Willhite,et al.  Development of correlations to predict biopolymer mobility in porous media , 1991 .

[25]  Yoshihiro Masuda,et al.  1D simulation of polymer flooding including the viscoelastic effect of polymer solution , 1992 .

[26]  The Effects of Mechanical Degradation and Viscoelastic Behavior on Polyacrylamide Solutions , 2001 .

[27]  R. Seright,et al.  X-Ray Computed Microtomography Studies of Fluid Partitioning in Drainage and Imbibition Before and After Gel Placement: Disproportionate Permeability Reduction , 2006 .

[28]  Guoyin Zhang,et al.  Conformance and Mobility Control: Foams versus Polymers , 2007 .

[29]  Johan Hoffman,et al.  Laminar and Turbulent Flow , 2007 .

[30]  R. Seright,et al.  Key Aspects of Project Design for Polymer Flooding at the Daqing Oilfield , 2008 .

[31]  Gary A. Pope,et al.  Mechanistic Interpretation and Utilization of Viscoelastic Behavior of Polymer Solutions for Improved Polymer-Flood Efficiency , 2008 .

[32]  R. Seright,et al.  Injectivity Characteristics of EOR Polymers , 2009 .

[33]  Xiaofei Fu,et al.  Review of Practical Experience by Polymer Flooding at Daqing , 2009 .

[34]  R. Seright USE OF POLYMERS TO RECOVER VISCOUS OIL FROM UNCONVENTIONAL RESERVOIRS , 2011 .