Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding.

The feedback-related negativity (FRN) is an event-related brain potential component that is elicited by feedback stimuli indicating unfavorable outcomes. Until recently, the FRN has been studied primarily using experimental paradigms in which outcomes appeared to be contingent upon the participants' behavior. The present study further addressed the question whether an FRN can be elicited by outcomes that are not contingent on any preceding choice or action. Participants took part in a simple slot-machine task in which they experienced monetary gains and losses in the absence of responses. In addition, they performed a time estimation task often used to study the FRN and a flanker task known to elicit the error-related negativity. Outcomes in the slot-machine task elicited an FRN-like mediofrontal negativity whose amplitude correlated with the amplitude of the FRN associated with negative feedback in the time estimation task. However, the mediofrontal negativity was observed both for (unfavorable) outcomes that averted a gain and for (favorable) outcomes that averted a loss of money. The results are discussed in the framework of current conceptions of the FRN and related electrophysiological components.

[1]  F. Perrin,et al.  Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. , 1989, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[2]  C. Brunia,et al.  Psychophysiological brain research. , 1993 .

[3]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  The Medial Frontal Cortex and the Rapid Processing of Monetary Gains and Losses , 2002, Science.

[4]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Errors in reward prediction are re£ected in the event-related brain potential , 2003 .

[5]  C. Carter,et al.  The Timing of Action-Monitoring Processes in the Anterior Cingulate Cortex , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[7]  E Donchin,et al.  A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  N. Squires,et al.  The effect of stimulus sequence on the waveform of the cortical event-related potential. , 1976, Science.

[9]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  A mechanism for error detection in speeded response time tasks. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. , 2002, Psychological review.

[11]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system. , 2005, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  ERP correlates of feedback and reward processing in the presence and absence of response choice. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[13]  J. Thayer,et al.  The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[14]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[15]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: origins and functional significance , 2004, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[16]  A. Sanfey,et al.  Independent Coding of Reward Magnitude and Valence in the Human Brain , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  B. Kopp,et al.  N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[18]  Adrian R. Willoughby,et al.  Are all medial frontal negativities created equal ? Toward a richer empirical basis for theories of action monitoring , 2003 .

[19]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Dorsal anterior cingulate cortex shows fMRI response to internal and external error signals , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Meyer,et al.  A Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1993 .

[21]  M. Posner,et al.  Localization of a Neural System for Error Detection and Compensation , 1994 .

[22]  M. Coles,et al.  Cardiac activity and information processing: the effects of stimulus significance, and detection and response requirements. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  C. Braun,et al.  Event-Related Brain Potentials Following Incorrect Feedback in a Time-Estimation Task: Evidence for a Generic Neural System for Error Detection , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  A computational account of altered error processing in older age: Dopamine and the error-related negativity , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[25]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  A note on the oddball N200 and the feedback ERN , 2004 .

[26]  K. Böcker,et al.  Cortical Measures of Anticipation , 2004 .

[27]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Context dependence of the event-related brain potential associated with reward and punishment. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[28]  F. Donkers,et al.  Mediofrontal negativities to averted gains and losses in the slot-machine task : a further investigation , 2005 .

[29]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Sensitivity of electrophysiological activity from medial frontal cortex to utilitarian and performance feedback. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[30]  Scott A. Shappell,et al.  Psychophysiology of N200/N400: A Review and Classification Scheme , 1991 .

[31]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Error-related scalp potentials elicited by hand and foot movements: evidence for an output-independent error-processing system in humans , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[32]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  The feedback-related negativity reflects the binary evaluation of good versus bad outcomes , 2006, Biological Psychology.

[33]  H. J. Eysenck,et al.  Advances in psychophysiology: J.R. Jennings, P.K. Ackles & M.G.H. Coles (Eds) Vol.5 (1993).320 pp. £42.50 (hardback). ISBN 185302 191 1 , 1994 .

[34]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The neural basis of error detection: conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. , 2004, Psychological review.