How Executive SHRM System Links to Firm Performance: The Perspectives of Upper Echelon and Competitive Dynamics†

This study adopts the upper echelon and competitive dynamics perspectives to investigate the mechanisms by which strategic human resource management (SHRM) can create a competitive advantage for a firm. Top management team (TMT) social integration and action aggressiveness are identified as internal-oriented and external-oriented capabilities, respectively, for a teamwork-oriented executive SHRM system to support in enhancing firm performance. Structural equation modeling is performed to test hypothesized relationships. Statistical results demonstrate TMT social integration and action aggressiveness in sequence partially mediate the relationship of an executive SHRM system and firm performance. Action aggressiveness partially mediates the relationship of TMT social integration and firm performance. This study provides further insights into the SHRM, upper echelon, and competitive dynamics perspectives. The research findings also serve to remind top executives to remain alert in developing a set of teamwork-focused executive SHRM practices, building an integrated team, and proactively shaping competitive actions to outperform rivals.

[1]  Gerben S. van der Vegt,et al.  PATTERNS OF INTERDEPENDENCE IN WORK TEAMS: A TWO‐LEVEL INVESTIGATION OF THE RELATIONS WITH JOB AND TEAM SATISFACTION , 2001 .

[2]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses , 1992 .

[3]  Raimar Richers.  The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[4]  Chih-Hsun Chuang,et al.  Constructing factors related to worker retention , 2006 .

[5]  S. Seashore.  Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group , 1955 .

[6]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[7]  Danny Miller,et al.  Psychological and Traditional Determinants of Structure. , 1986 .

[8]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[9]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[10]  M. Veloso,et al.  Latent Variable Models , 2019, Statistical and Econometric Methods for Transportation Data Analysis.

[11]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[12]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Examining the Human Resource Architecture: The Relationships Among Human Capital, Employment, and Human Resource Configurations , 2002 .

[13]  Mark D. Choudhari.  The dynamics of competitive strategy , 1997 .

[14]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. , 1987 .

[15]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Toward a Unifying Framework for Exploring Fit and Flexibility in Strategic Human Resource Management , 1998 .

[16]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Practical Issues in Structural Modeling , 1987 .

[17]  C. Burke,et al.  The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[18]  S. Carroll,et al.  Which executive human resource management practices for the top management team are associated with higher firm performance , 1995 .

[19]  J. Poon,et al.  Effects of performance appraisal politics on job satisfaction and turnover intention , 2004 .

[20]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[21]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[22]  D. Hambrick.  Upper Echelons Theory: An Update , 2007 .

[23]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2006 .

[24]  S. Scott,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF INNOVATIVE BEHAVIOR: A PATH MODEL OF INDIVIDUAL INNOVATION IN THE WORKPLACE , 1994 .

[25]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  Upper Echelons Research Revisited: Antecedents, Elements, and Consequences of Top Management Team Composition , 2004 .

[26]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[27]  Zeki Simsek,et al.  Modeling the Multilevel Determinants of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration , 2005 .

[28]  S. Jackson,et al.  Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? , 1989 .

[29]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Human resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective , 1994 .

[30]  Walter D. Davis,et al.  Journal of Management High-performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance: the Mediating Role of Internal on Behalf Of: Southern Management Association , 2005 .

[31]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  “Austrian” and Industrial Organization Perspectives on Firm-level Competitive Activity and Performance , 1996 .

[32]  Ian C. MacMillan,et al.  An Exploration of the Expertness of Outside Informants , 1993 .

[33]  James Guthrie,et al.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: DOES INDUSTRY MATTER? , 2005 .

[34]  Bruce A. Walters,et al.  Chief executive scanning emphases, environmental dynamism, and manufacturing firm performance , 2003 .

[35]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Strategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go From Here? , 2006 .

[36]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  Human Resource Systems and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Competency-Based Perspective , 1994 .

[37]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[38]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. , 1980 .

[39]  Wenpin Tsai,et al.  Competitive Tension: The Awareness-Motivation-Capability Perspective , 2007 .

[40]  Curtis M. Grimm,et al.  Timing, order and durability of new product advantages with imitation , 2000 .

[41]  D. Hambrick.  Fragmentation and the other Problems CEOs Have with Their Top Management Teams , 1995 .

[42]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Organizational Information Processing, Competitive Responses, and Performance in the U.S. Domestic Airline Industry , 1991 .

[43]  L. Harlow,et al.  Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices , 1995 .

[44]  Michael D. Ensley,et al.  Shared cognition in top management teams: implications for new venture performance , 2001 .

[45]  Mason A. Carpenter,et al.  The Effects of Top Management Team Pay and Firm Internationalization on MNC Performance , 2004 .

[46]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: four cases in the microcomputer industry , 1988 .

[47]  C. Collins,et al.  STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM SOCIAL NETWORKS, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES IN CREATING ORGANIZATIONAL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[48]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures, 1978-1988. , 1990 .

[49]  B. Lawrence.  The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[50]  Walter J. Ferrier.  Navigating the Competitive Landscape: The Drivers and Consequences of Competitive Aggressiveness , 2001 .

[51]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Making Fast Strategic Decisions In High-Velocity Environments , 1989 .

[52]  Devi R. Gnyawali,et al.  CEO compensation and firm competitive behavior: Empirical evidence from the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 2005 .

[53]  K. Sutcliffe,et al.  Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[54]  David B. Balkin,et al.  Compensation, Organizational Strategy, and Firm Performance , 1992 .

[55]  G. Labianca,et al.  Group Social Capital and Group Effectiveness: The Role of Informal Socializing Ties , 2004 .

[56]  Karlene H. Roberts,et al.  Some correlations of communication roles in organizations. , 1979 .

[57]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[58]  Michael J. Stevens,et al.  Staffing Work Teams: Development and Validation of a Selection Test for Teamwork Settings , 1999 .

[59]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  COMPETITIVE DYNAMICS RESEARCH: CRITIQUE AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 2002 .

[60]  Timothy M. Gardner,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HR PRACTICES AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING CAUSAL ORDER , 2005 .

[61]  David P. Lepak,et al.  The Human Resource Architecture: Toward a Theory of Human Capital Allocation and Development , 1999 .

[62]  T. Baldwin,et al.  Invited reaction: Linking learning with financial performance , 2002 .

[63]  Theresa S. Cho,et al.  The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Firms' Competitive Moves , 1996 .

[64]  Danny Miller,et al.  SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITIVE INERTIA: A STUDY OF THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY. , 1994 .

[65]  D. Balkin,et al.  Performance evaluation and compensation feedback messages: An integrated model , 1990 .

[66]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[67]  M. A. Campion,et al.  The Knowledge, Skill, and Ability Requirements for Teamwork: Implications for Human Resource Management , 1994 .

[68]  Robert I Westwood,et al.  Harmony and Patriarchy: The Cultural Basis for 'Paternalistic Headship' Among the Overseas Chinese , 1997 .

[69]  Scott A. Snell,et al.  Human Resource Configurations, Intellectual Capital, and Organizational Performance. , 2004 .

[70]  W. Dunlap,et al.  Testing Interaction Effects in LISREL: Examination and Illustration of Available Procedures , 2001 .

[71]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[72]  P. Wright,et al.  Desegregating HRM: A Review and Synthesis of Micro and Macro Human Resource Management Research , 2002 .

[73]  Walter J. Ferrier,et al.  The Role of Competitive Action in Market Share Erosion and Industry Dethronement: A Study of Industry Leaders and Challengers , 1999 .

[74]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices , 1999 .

[75]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance , 1996 .

[76]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[77]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 2007 .

[78]  C. Collins,et al.  STRATEGIC HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES, TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM SOCIAL NETWORKS, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: THE ROLE OF HUMAN RESOURCE PRACTICES IN CREATING ORGANIZATIONAL COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE , 2003 .

[79]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Organizing to implement strategies of diversity and globalization: The role of matrix designs , 1986 .

[80]  Ross Quarles,et al.  An Examination of Promotion Opportunities and Evaluation Criteria as Mechanisms for Affecting Internal Auditor Commitment, Job Satisfaction and Turnover Intentions , 1994 .

[81]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Politics of Strategic Decision Making in High-Velocity Environments: Toward a Midrange Theory , 1988 .

[82]  Donald D. Bergh,et al.  Executive retention and acquisition outcomes: A test of opposing views on the influence of organizational tenure , 2001 .

[83]  Charmine E. J. Härtel,et al.  How leaders influence the impact of affective events on team climate and performance in R&D teams , 2002 .

[84]  Ming-Jer Chen,et al.  Nonresponse and Delayed Response to Competitive Moves: The Roles of Competitor Dependence and Action Irreversibility , 1992 .

[85]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[86]  Timothy M. Gardner.  Interfirm Competition for Human Resources: Evidence From the Software Industry , 2005 .

[87]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .

[88]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[89]  Shay S. Tzafrir,et al.  The effect of human resource management practices on the perceptions of organizational and market performance of the firm , 1999 .

[90]  George P. Baker,et al.  Incentives and cooperation: the joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance , 1997 .

[91]  Barbara S. Lawrence,et al.  Perspective---The Black Box of Organizational Demography , 1997 .

[92]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Technical and Strategic Human Resource Management Effectiveness as Determinants of Firm Performance , 1997 .

[93]  Michael D. Ensley,et al.  A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: the central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs) , 2004 .

[94]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest , 1986 .

[95]  P. Wright,et al.  Theoretical Perspectives for Strategic Human Resource Management , 1992 .

[96]  Allen C. Amason,et al.  Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance , 2002 .

[97]  Marc D. Street.  Groupthink , 1997 .

[98]  W. P. Barnett,et al.  Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. , 1989 .

[99]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage , 2004 .

[100]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[101]  L. Donaldson.  Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations , 1997 .

[102]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  The Impact of Team Empowerment on Virtual Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Face-to-Face Interaction , 2004 .

[103]  Z. Aycan.  The interplay between cultural and institutional/structural contingencies in human resource management practices , 2005 .

[104]  P. Bentler,et al.  Fit indices in covariance structure modeling : Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification , 1998 .

[105]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[106]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[107]  C. Schriesheim.  The Similarity of Individual Directed and Group Directed Leader Behavior Descriptions , 1979 .