Population differentiation in female sex pheromone and male preferences in a solitary bee
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] M. Ayasse,et al. Mating expenditures reduced via female sex pheromone modulation in the primitively eusocial halictine bee, Lasioglossum (Evylaeus) malachurum (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[2] L. Simmons. Kin recognition and its influence on mating preferences of the field cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus (de Geer) , 1989, Animal Behaviour.
[3] J. Boughman. How sensory drive can promote speciation , 2002 .
[4] D S Jordan,et al. THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES THROUGH ISOLATION. , 1905, Science.
[5] W. Wcislo. Attraction and learning in mate-finding by solitary bees, Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi Wcislo and Nomia triangulifera Vachal (Hymenoptera : Halictidae) , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[6] W. Potts,et al. Evolution of MHC genetic diversity: a tale of incest, pestilence and sexual preference. , 1993, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[7] C. Löfstedt,et al. Attraction of male turnip mothsAgrotis segetum (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to sex pheromone components and their mixtures at 11 sites in Europe, Asia, and Africa , 1992, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[8] William J. Bell,et al. Chemical Ecology of Insects , 1985, Springer US.
[9] N. Vereecken,et al. Cuticular Hydrocarbons as Sex Pheromone of the Bee Colletes cunicularius and the Key to its Mimicry by the Sexually Deceptive Orchid, Ophrys exaltata , 2005, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[10] Charles D. Michener,et al. The Social Behavior of the Bees , 1974 .
[11] C. Boake. Sexual Signaling and Speciation, a Microevolutionary Perspective , 2002, Genetica.
[12] A. Matheson. Forage for Bees in an Agricultural Landscape , 1994 .
[13] F. Schiestl. On the success of a swindle: pollination by deception in orchids , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.
[14] T. Tscharntke,et al. Plant-insect interactions in fragmented landscapes. , 2004, Annual review of entomology.
[15] K. Dettner,et al. CHEMICAL MIMICRY AND CAMOUFLAGE , 1994 .
[16] O. Larsen,et al. Vibration and sound communication in solitary bees and wasps , 1986 .
[17] J. Antonovics. The effects of a heterogeneous environment on the genetics of natural populations. , 1971, American Scientist.
[18] R. Punnett,et al. The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection , 1930, Nature.
[19] F. Schiestl,et al. Floral evolution and pollinator mate choice in a sexually deceptive orchid , 2003, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[20] C. Löfstedt. Moth Pheromone Genetics and Evolution , 1993 .
[21] M. Breed,et al. The Chemical Basis for Nestmate Recognition and Mate Discrimination in Social Insects , 1995 .
[22] B. Smith,et al. Kin-based male mating preferences in two species of halictine bee , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[23] T. Tregenza,et al. Sexual selection and speciation. , 2001, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[24] Achim Gathmann,et al. Foraging ranges of solitary bees , 2002 .
[25] A. Borg-Karlson,et al. (S)-(+)-Linalool, a Mate Attractant Pheromone Component in the Bee Colletes cunicularius , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[26] DOES SELECTION ON FLORAL ODOR PROMOTE DIFFERENTIATION AMONG POPULATIONS AND SPECIES OF THE SEXUALLY DECEPTIVE ORCHID GENUS OPHRYS? , 2005, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[27] H. Noyes,et al. Male sex pheromones and the phylogeographic structure of the Lutzomyia longipalpis species complex (Diptera: Psychodidae) from Brazil and Venezuela. , 2005, American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.
[28] J. Cane,et al. Pheromonal cues direct mate-seeking behavior of maleColletes cunicularius (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) , 1981, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[29] P. Hedrick,et al. Genetic Polymorphism in Heterogeneous Environments , 1976 .
[30] F. Clarke,et al. Kin discrimination and female mate choice in the naked mole-rat Heterocephalus glaber , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[31] J. Neff,et al. Floral Rewards: Alternatives to Pollen and Nectar , 1981 .
[32] C. Löfstedt,et al. Pheromone variation among eastern European and a western Asian population of the turnip mothAgrotis segetum , 1990, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[33] H. R. Koepfer. SELECTION FOR SEXUAL ISOLATION BETWEEN GEOGRAPHIC FORMS OF DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS. II. EFFECTS OF SELECTION OF MATING PREFERENCE AND PROPENSITY , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[34] W. Roelofs,et al. Individual variation in sex pheromone component ratios in two populations of the redbanded leafroller moth, Argyrotaenia velutinana. , 1980 .
[35] John R. G. Turner,et al. The Evolution of Mimicry: A Solution to the Problem of Punctuated Equilibrium , 1988, The American Naturalist.
[36] J. David,et al. VARIATIONS IN CUTICULAR HYDROCARBONS AMONG THE EIGHT SPECIES OF THE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER SUBGROUP , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[37] D. Liang,et al. “You are what you eat”: Diet modifies cuticular hydrocarbons and nestmate recognition in the Argentine ant, Linepithema humile , 2000, Naturwissenschaften.
[38] C. Löfstedt,et al. Pheromone dialects in European turnip moths Agrotis segetum , 1986 .
[39] M. Breed. Animal Signals.Oxford Series in Ecology and Evolution.ByJohn Maynard Smithand, David Harper.Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. $99.50 (hardcover); $44.50 (paper). ix + 166 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0–19–852684–9 (hc); 0–19–852685–7 (pb). 2003. , 2005 .
[40] Eran Pichersky,et al. Biology of floral scent , 2006 .
[41] T. Markow,et al. COURTSHIP BEHAVIOR AND CONTROL OF REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION IN DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[42] J. Knudsen,et al. Floral scents-a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by head-space techniques , 1993 .
[43] G. C. Eickwort,et al. FORAGING AND MATING BEHAVIOR IN APOIDEA , 1980 .
[44] D. Schluter,et al. The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation , 2000 .
[45] E. Pichersky,et al. New Perspectives in Pollination Biology: Floral Fragrances. A day in the life of a linalool molecule: Chemical communication in a plant‐pollinator system. Part 1: Linalool biosynthesis in flowering plants , 1999 .
[46] P. Smouse,et al. genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research , 2006 .
[47] J. Tengö,et al. The effects of temperature and body size on the mating pattern of a gregariously nesting bee, Colletes cunicularius (Hymenoptera: Colletidae) , 1989 .
[48] M. Ayasse,et al. Mating behavior and chemical communication in the order Hymenoptera. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.
[49] J. Barker,et al. Ecological and Evolutionary Genetics of Drosophila , 1990, Monographs in Evolutionary Biology.
[50] J. Millar,et al. GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN THE PHEROMONE SYSTEM OF THE SATURNIID MOTHHEMILEUCA EGLANTERINA , 2001 .
[51] S. Wright,et al. Isolation by Distance. , 1943, Genetics.
[52] T. Markow,et al. Temperature Effects on Epicuticular Hydrocarbons and Sexual Isolation in Drosophila mojavensis , 1990 .
[53] K. C. Spencer,et al. Chemical Mediation of Coevolution , 1990 .
[54] J. Gershenzon,et al. The Chemical Diversity of Floral Scent , 2020, Biology of Plant Volatiles.
[55] S. Wakamura,et al. Geographical variation in female sex pheromones of the rice leaffolder moth, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis: identification of pheromone components in Japan , 2000 .
[56] J. Keogh,et al. Mate recognition in a freshwater fish: geographical distance, genetic differentiation, and variation in female preference for local over foreign males , 2004, Journal of evolutionary biology.
[57] R. Peakall,et al. A mark-recapture study of male Colletes cunicularius bees: implications for pollination by sexual deception , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[58] T. Markow. SEXUAL ISOLATION AMONG POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS , 1991, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[59] W. Etges. PREMATING ISOLATION IS DETERMINED BY LARVAL SUBSTRATES IN CACTOPHILIC DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS , 1992, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[60] W. Etges,et al. Premating Isolation Is Determined by Larval‐Rearing Substrates in Cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. V. Deep Geographic Variation in Epicuticular Hydrocarbons among Isolated Populations* , 2001, The American Naturalist.
[61] J. Klun. Insect sex pheromones: intraspecific pheromonal variability of Ostrinia nubilalis in North America and Europe. , 1975 .
[62] U. Candolin. The use of multiple cues in mate choice , 2003, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[63] M. Kohn. You Are What You Eat , 1999, Science.
[64] G. Bergström,et al. Linalool in mandibular gland secretion ofColletes bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) , 1978, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[65] A. Rooney,et al. Evolution of moth sex pheromones via ancestral genes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[66] H. R. Koepfer. SELECTION FOR SEXUAL ISOLATION BETWEEN GEOGRAPHIC FORMS OF DROSOPHILA MOJAVENSIS. I. INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE SELECTED FORMS , 1987, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.
[67] W. Etges,et al. Premating Isolation Is Determined by Larval Rearing Substrates in CactophilicDrosophila mojavensis. III. Epicuticular Hydrocarbon Variation Is Determined by Use of Different Host Plants inDrosophila mojavensis andDrosophila arizonae , 1997, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[68] M. Ayasse,et al. Post-mating odor in females of the solitary bee, Andrena nigroaenea (Apoidea, Andrenidae), inhibits male mating behavior , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.
[69] R. Lande. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[70] M. Stowe. CHAPTER 17 – Chemical Mimicry , 1988 .
[71] S. Turillazzi,et al. Cuticular Hydrocarbons of Polistes dominulus as a Biogeographic Tool: A Study of Populations from the Tuscan Archipelago and Surrounding Areas , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.
[72] M. West-Eberhard. Sexual Selection, Social Competition, and Speciation , 1983, The Quarterly Review of Biology.
[73] N. Mantel. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. , 1967, Cancer research.