A numerical investigation on the fire response of a steel girder bridge

Abstract The response of bridges subject to fire is an under researched topic despite the number of bridge failures caused by fire. Since available data shows that steel girder bridges are especially vulnerable to fire, this paper delves into their fire response by analyzing with a 3D numerical model the response of a typical bridge of 12.20 m span length. A parametric study is performed considering: (1) two possibilities for the axial restraint of the bridge deck, (2) four types of structural steel for the girders (carbon steel and stainless steel grades 1.4301, 1.4401, and 1.4462), (3) three different constitutive models for carbon steel, (4) four live loads, and (5) two alternative fire loads (the hydrocarbon fire defined by Eurocode 1 and a fire corresponding to a real fire event). Results show that restraint to deck expansion coming from an adjacent span or abutment should be considered in the numerical model. In addition, times to collapse are very small when the bridge girders are built with carbon steel (between 8.5 and 18 min) but they can almost double if stainless steel is used for the girders. Therefore, stainless steel is a material to consider for steel girder bridges in a high fire risk situation, especially if the bridge is located in a corrosive environment and its aesthetics deserves special attention. The methodology developed in this paper and the results obtained are useful for researchers and practitioners interested in developing and applying a performance-based approach for the design of bridges against fire.

[1]  David M Levinson,et al.  The Traffic and Behavioral Effects of the I-35W Mississippi River Bridge Collapse , 2010 .

[2]  Christopher N. McCowan,et al.  Mechanical Properties of Structural Steels. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster (NIST NCSTAR 1-3D) ***DRAFT for Public Comments*** | NIST , 2005 .

[3]  Venkatesh Kodur,et al.  Review and Assessment of Fire Hazard in Bridges , 2010 .

[4]  Venkatesh Kodur,et al.  Fire hazard in bridges: Review, assessment and repair strategies , 2012 .

[5]  Paulo Vila Real,et al.  Numerical study of a steel sub-frame in fire , 2008 .

[6]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Structural Design for Fire Safety , 2001 .

[7]  Bryan E. Little,et al.  American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Highway Drainage Guidelines American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. LRFD Bridge Design Specifications , 2000 .

[8]  Spencer E. Quiel,et al.  Closed-Form Procedure for Predicting the Capacity and Demand of Steel Beam-Columns under Fire , 2011 .

[9]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Measuring post-disaster transportation system performance: the 1995 Kobe earthquake in comparative perspective , 2001 .

[10]  Juan A. Sobrino Stainless Steel Road Bridge in Menorca, Spain , 2006 .

[11]  Miguel A. Serrano-López,et al.  Stiffness of the component ‘lateral faces of RHS’ at high temperature , 2011 .

[12]  Nicholas J. Carino,et al.  Passive Fire Protection. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster (NIST NCSTAR 1-6A) | NIST , 2005 .

[13]  Lin-Hai Han,et al.  FE modelling and fire resistance design of concrete filled double skin tubular columns , 2011 .

[14]  Manuel L. Romero,et al.  Fire behavior of axially loaded slender high strength concrete-filled tubular columns , 2011 .

[15]  Mahmud Ashraf,et al.  Elevated temperature material properties of stainless steel alloys , 2010 .

[16]  N. R. Baddoo,et al.  Stainless steel in construction: A review of research, applications, challenges and opportunities , 2008 .

[17]  Joseph P. Nicoletti,et al.  Seismic Design and Retrofit of Bridges , 1996 .

[18]  Christopher N. McCowan,et al.  Physical Properties of Structural Steels. Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster (NIST NCSTAR 1-3E) | NIST , 2005 .