Effect of processing time delay on the dose response of Kodak EDR2 film.

Kodak EDR2 film is a widely used two-dimensional dosimeter for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) measurements. Our clinical use of EDR2 film for IMRT verifications revealed variations and uncertainties in dose response that were larger than expected, given that we perform film calibrations for every experimental measurement. We found that the length of time between film exposure and processing can affect the absolute dose response of EDR2 film by as much as 4%-6%. EDR2 films were exposed to 300 cGy using 6 and 18 MV 10 x 10 cm2 fields and then processed after time delays ranging from 2 min to 24 h. An ion chamber measured the relative dose for these film exposures. The ratio of optical density (OD) to dose stabilized after 3 h. Compared to its stable value, the film response was 4%-6% lower at 2 min and 1% lower at 1 h. The results of the 4 min and 1 h processing time delays were verified with a total of four different EDR2 film batches. The OD/dose response for XV2 films was consistent for time periods of 4 min and 1 h between exposure and processing. To investigate possible interactions of the processing time delay effect with dose, single EDR2 films were irradiated to eight different dose levels between 45 and 330 cGy using smaller 3 x 3 cm2 areas. These films were processed after time delays of 1, 3, and 6 h, using 6 and 18 MV photon qualities. The results at all dose levels were consistent, indicating that there is no change in the processing time delay effect for different doses. The difference in the time delay effect between the 6 and 18 MV measurements was negligible for all experiments. To rule out bias in selecting film regions for OD measurement, we compared the use of a specialized algorithm that systematically determines regions of interest inside the 10 x 10 cm2 exposure areas to manually selected regions of interest. There was a maximum difference of only 0.07% between the manually and automatically selected regions, indicating that the use of a systematic algorithm to determine regions of interest in large and fairly uniform areas is not necessary. Based on these results, we recommend a minimum time of 1 h between exposure and processing for all EDR2 film measurements.

[1]  S. Burch,et al.  A new approach to film dosimetry for high energy photon beams: lateral scatter filtering. , 1997, Medical physics.

[2]  B. Clark,et al.  The use of radiographic film for linear accelerator stereotactic radiosurgical dosimetry. , 1999, Medical physics.

[3]  N. Suchowerska,et al.  Directional dependence in film dosimetry: radiographic and radiochromic film. , 2001, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  J C Rosenwald,et al.  Variation of sensitometric curves of radiographic films in high energy photon beams. , 2001, Medical physics.

[5]  Lei Dong,et al.  Rapid radiographic film calibration for IMRT verification using automated MLC fields. , 2002, Medical physics.

[6]  The value of radiographic film for the characterization of intensity-modulated beams. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  A. Olch.  Dosimetric accuracy of the ITP inverse treatment planning system. , 2002, Medical physics.

[8]  G. Ibbott,et al.  Dosimetric considerations for validation of a sequential IMRT process with a commercial treatment planning system. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  A Kapulsky,et al.  An automated phantom-film QA procedure for intensity-modulated radiation therapy. , 2002, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[10]  Nesrin Dogan,et al.  Comparative evaluation of Kodak EDR2 and XV2 films for verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  J. Rownd,et al.  Evaluation of Kodak EDR2 film for dose verification of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivered by a static multileaf collimator. , 2002, Medical physics.

[12]  A. Olch.  Dosimetric performance of an enhanced dose range radiographic film for intensity-modulated radiation therapy quality assurance. , 2002, Medical physics.

[13]  Inhwan Jason Yeo,et al.  Film dosimetry for intensity modulated radiation therapy: dosimetric evaluation. , 2002, Medical physics.

[14]  Investigation of Kodak extended dose range (EDR) film for megavoltage photon beam dosimetry. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  J. Dempsey,et al.  Dosimetry of therapeutic photon beams using an extended dose range film. , 2002, Medical physics.

[16]  G. Glasgow,et al.  Surface and build-up region dosimetry for obliquely incident intensity modulated radiotherapy 6 MV x rays. , 2003, Medical physics.

[17]  W. Tomé,et al.  IMRT delivery verification using a spiral phantom. , 2003, Medical physics.

[18]  R. Pötter,et al.  Normalized sensitometric curves for the verification of hybrid IMRT treatment plans with multiple energies. , 2003, Medical physics.

[19]  J. Rownd,et al.  Characteristics of sensitometric curves of radiographic films. , 2003, Medical physics.

[20]  Nesrin Dogan,et al.  Automatic feathering of split fields for step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Patrick N. McDermott,et al.  Dose calculation accuracy of lung planning with a commercial IMRT treatment planning system , 2003, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[22]  I. Chetty,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of extended dose range film with ionization measurements in water and lung equivalent heterogeneous media exposed to megavoltage photons , 2003, Journal of applied clinical medical physics.

[23]  M. Bucciolini,et al.  Verification of IMRT fields by film dosimetry. , 2003, Medical physics.