A Critique of the Committee of Seven's Investigations on the Grade Placement of Arithmetic Topics
暂无分享,去创建一个
The person who challenges "reforms" now being made in arithmetic instruction in the name of "readiness" invites unhappy consequences. He may be accused of bias arising from vested interests. He may be charged with being a traditionalist, an educational reactionary. He may be condemned for inhumanity toward children and even for ignorance of child psychology. Nevertheless, it is high time, I think, to examine critically the research basis claimed for the "reforms" to which allusion has been made.
[1] F. Grossnickle. An Experiment with Two Methods of Estimation of the Quotient , 1937, The Elementary school journal.
[2] Adjusting the School to the Child , 1937, Mental Welfare.
[3] C. Washburne. The Values, Limitations, and Applications of the Findings of the Committee of Seven , 1936 .
[4] C. Washburne. Mental Age and the Arithmetic Curriculum: A Summary of the Committee of Seven Grade Placement Investigations to Date , 1931 .