Direct multiple shooting transcription with polynomial algebra for optimal control problems under uncertainty

Abstract This paper proposes a novel approach to the solution of optimal control problems under uncertainty (OCPUUs). OCPUUs are first cast in a general formulation that allows the treatment of uncertainties of different nature, and then solved with a new direct transcription method that combines multiple shooting with generalised polynomial algebra to model and propagate extended sets. The continuity conditions on extended sets at the boundary of two adjacent segments are directly satisfied by a bounding approach. The Intrusive Polynomial Algebra aNd Multiple shooting Approach (IPANeMA) developed in this work can handle optimal control problems under a wide range of uncertainty models, including nonparametric, epistemic, and imprecise probability ones. In this paper, the approach is applied to the design of a robust low-thrust trajectory to a Near-Earth Object with uncertain initial conditions. It is shown that the new method provides more robust and reliable trajectories than the solution of an analogous deterministic optimal control problem.

[1]  R. Broucke,et al.  On the equinoctial orbit elements , 1972 .

[2]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  Set propagation in dynamical systems with generalised polynomial algebra and its computational complexity , 2019, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[3]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  Extended analytical formulas for the perturbed Keplerian motion under a constant control acceleration , 2015 .

[4]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  SMART-UQ : uncertainty quantification toolbox for generalised intrusive and non intrusive polynomial algebra , 2016 .

[5]  Gregory J. Whiffen,et al.  Dawn Safing Approach to Ceres Re-Design , 2016 .

[6]  Martin Berz,et al.  High order optimal control of space trajectories with uncertain boundary conditions , 2014 .

[7]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  De-orbiting and re-entry analysis with generalised intrusive polynomial expansions , 2016 .

[8]  B. V. Semenov,et al.  A look towards the future in the handling of space science mission geometry , 2018 .

[9]  Christof Büskens,et al.  The ESA NLP Solver WORHP , 2012 .

[10]  Arthur G. Richards,et al.  Robust stable model predictive control with constraint tightening , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[11]  Nando de Freitas,et al.  Sequential Monte Carlo Methods in Practice , 2001, Statistics for Engineering and Information Science.

[12]  F. Vázquez-Abad,et al.  Stochastic Programming with Probability Constraints , 2007 .

[13]  Ryu Funase,et al.  Stochastic Differential Dynamic Programming with Unscented Transform for Low-Thrust Trajectory Design , 2017 .

[14]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  An intrusive approach to uncertainty propagation in orbital mechanics based on Tchebycheff polynomial algebra , 2015 .

[15]  Hitoshi Kuninaka,et al.  Lessons learned from round trip of Hayabusa asteroid explorer in deep space , 2011, 2011 Aerospace Conference.

[16]  George M. Siouris,et al.  Applied Optimal Control: Optimization, Estimation, and Control , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[17]  Massimiliano Vasile,et al.  CAMELOT: Computational-Analytical Multi-fidElity Low-thrust Optimisation Toolbox , 2016 .

[18]  Marc D. Rayman,et al.  Design of the First Interplanetary Solar Electric Propulsion Mission , 2002 .

[19]  Matthias C. M. Troffaes,et al.  Introduction to imprecise probabilities , 2014 .

[20]  Eric D. Gustafson,et al.  Stochastic optimal control of spacecraft , 2010 .