Masking the Strangulation of Opposition Parties as Pandemic Response: Austerity Measures Targeting the Local Level in Hungary

While a large literature studies the various tools of autocratic survival, targeting opposition actors with austerity measures in electoral autocracies is hitherto understudied. This paper argues that the COVID-19 pandemic has provided a rare opportunity for Hungary’s Fidesz party to disarm opposition parties via cutting off resources of municipalities led by opposition mayors and eliminating any remnants of local governments’ fiscal autonomy. Analysing original data from government decrees on local transfers, this study contributes to the existing literature by conceptualising fiscal strangulation as part of electoral authoritarian regimes’ toolbox to discredit opposition parties and their ability to govern locally.

[1]  Brian Turnbull,et al.  The COVID-19 pandemic and authoritarian consolidation in North Africa , 2022, Journal of Human Rights.

[2]  L. Littvay,et al.  Greater than the sum of its part(ie)s: opposition comeback in the 2019 Hungarian local elections , 2022, East European Politics.

[3]  Agnes Batory More Power, Less Support: The Fidesz Government and the Coronavirus Pandemic in Hungary , 2022, Government and Opposition.

[4]  E. Gidengil,et al.  The partisan nature of support for democratic backsliding: A comparative perspective , 2021, European Journal of Political Research.

[5]  Erin K. Jenne,et al.  Populist argumentation in foreign policy: the case of Hungary under Viktor Orbán, 2010–2020 , 2021, Comparative European Politics.

[6]  Lasse Aaskoven,et al.  Stability through constraints: the impact of fiscal rules on autocratic survival , 2021, Democratization.

[7]  Hakan Yavuzyilmaz When local becomes general: Turkey's 31 March 2019 elections and its implications for dynamics of polarization and sustainability of competitive authoritarianism , 2021 .

[8]  S. Borgmann,et al.  Nine Months of COVID-19 Pandemic in Europe: A Comparative Time Series Analysis of Cases and Fatalities in 35 Countries , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[9]  Andrea L. Glaser,et al.  Democracy in times of the pandemic: explaining the variation of COVID-19 policies across European democracies , 2021 .

[10]  Jennifer McCoy,et al.  Pernicious polarization, autocratization and opposition strategies , 2021 .

[11]  É. Kovács,et al.  Understanding drivers of illiberal entrenchment at critical junctures: institutional responses to COVID-19 in Hungary and Poland , 2021 .

[12]  Daniel Green,et al.  State and Local Government Employment in the COVID-19 Crisis , 2020, Journal of Public Economics.

[13]  Pablo Sanabria-Pulido,et al.  The Transaction Costs of Government Responses to the COVID‐19 Emergency in Latin America , 2020, Public administration review.

[14]  M. Stenberg,et al.  Everyday illiberalism: How Hungarian subnational politics propel single‐party dominance , 2020 .

[15]  Zsófia Papp Votes, money can buy. The conditional effect of EU Structural Funds on government MPs’ electoral performance , 2019, European Union Politics.

[16]  Sebnem Gumuscu,et al.  Killing Competitive Authoritarianism Softly: The 2019 Local Elections in Turkey , 2019, South European Society and Politics.

[17]  L. Littvay,et al.  Where did all the environmentalism go? ‘Politics can be different’ (LMP) in the 2018 Hungarian parliamentary elections , 2019, Environmental Politics.

[18]  F. Vegetti The Political Nature of Ideological Polarization: The Case of Hungary , 2019, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.

[19]  Z. Enyedi,et al.  Explaining Eastern Europe: Orbán's Laboratory of Illiberalism , 2018 .

[20]  Matthijs Bogaards De-democratization in Hungary: diffusely defective democracy , 2018, Democratization.

[21]  K. Rogov The Art of Coercion: Repressions and Repressiveness in Putin’s Russia , 2018, Russian Politics.

[22]  Isabela Mares,et al.  The Core Voter’s Curse: Clientelistic Threats and Promises in Hungarian Elections , 2018 .

[23]  R. Kelemen Europe’s Other Democratic Deficit: National Authoritarianism in Europe’s Democratic Union , 2017, Government and Opposition.

[24]  Z. Enyedi Populist Polarization and Party System Institutionalization , 2016 .

[25]  B. Greskovits The Hollowing and Backsliding of Democracy in East Central Europe , 2015 .

[26]  S. Bolgherini Can Austerity Lead to Recentralisation? Italian Local Government during the Economic Crisis , 2014 .

[27]  A. Färber Low-budget Berlin: towards an understanding of low-budget urbanity as assemblage , 2014 .

[28]  Andrew E. G. Jonas,et al.  Urban fiscal austerity, infrastructure provision and the struggle for regional transit in ‘Motor City’ , 2014 .

[29]  R. Turovsky Opposition Parties in Hybrid Regimes: Between Repression and Co-optation: The Case of Russia's Regions , 2014 .

[30]  Johannes Gerschewski The three pillars of stability: legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes , 2013 .

[31]  Lawrence Pratchett,et al.  Local Governance under the Coalition Government: Austerity, Localism and the ‘Big Society’ , 2012 .

[32]  László Kákai,et al.  Hungary: Remarkable Successes and Costly Failures: An Evaluation of Subnational Democracy , 2010 .

[33]  Christian Davenport,et al.  State Repression and the Tyrannical Peace , 2007 .

[34]  Giovanni Capoccia,et al.  The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative, and Counterfactuals in Historical Institutionalism , 2007 .

[35]  P. Reddy Good Public Governance in a Global Pandemic , 2020 .

[36]  H. Baldersheim,et al.  Patterns of Local Autonomy in Europe , 2019, Governance and Public Management.

[37]  A. Ladner Autonomy and Austerity : Re-Investing in Local Government , 2017 .

[38]  Dániel Róna,et al.  Scapegoat-Based Policy Making in Hungary : Qualitative Evidence for How Jobbik and its Mayors Govern Municipalities , 2017 .