The influence of designs of protective uniforms on firefighters’ performance during moderate physical exercises

The aim of this study was to verify whether the minor differences in the design of uniforms and their fit can be quantified in terms of their impact on firefighters’ cardiorespiratory parameters and subjective perception of these uniforms. The impact of minor design improvements compared to the existing designs of personal protective clothing (PPC) is still relatively difficult to quantify due to the lack of sensitive devices used in smart measuring methodologies; however, the perception of these slight differences is reported by PPC users. The impact of these design differences in PPC on firefighters was studied via physiological tests based on occupation-related activities in which cardiorespiratory parameters were monitored and three-dimensional (3D) silhouette scanning was performed on the firefighters. Apart from heart rate (beats/min), none of the other measured physiological parameters, for example, oxygen consumption (VO2, ml/min) demonstrated statistically significant differences when firefighters were testing uniforms: ergonomic (ER), standard (ST), bulky (BU), and reference outfit (RO), the latter being T-shirt and shorts. A statistically significant correlation was found between parameters measured via 3D body scanning and selected cross-sections of the silhouettes as well as subjective assessments of easiness of specific movement performance during the physiological test and assessment of bulkiness of the uniforms. There is a limited influence of the minor design differences between firefighters’ uniforms on the selected physiological parameters of the subjects wearing them. The outcome of the study can be utilized when performing the test on subjects and improving designs of PPC.

[1]  Lynn M. Boorady,et al.  Exploration of Firefighter Turnout Gear Part 1: Identifying Male Firefighter User Needs , 2013 .

[2]  L. Godderis,et al.  Determinants of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) in fire fighter testing. , 2014, Applied ergonomics.

[3]  Tsui-Ying Kau,et al.  Sizing Firefighters , 2014, Hum. Factors.

[4]  Paul M. Young,et al.  Psychophysiological responses in experienced firefighters undertaking repeated self-contained breathing apparatus tasks , 2014, Ergonomics.

[5]  Mariann Sandsund,et al.  Performance on a Work-Simulating Firefighter Test Versus Approved Laboratory Tests for Firefighters and Applicants , 2013, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[6]  Asgeir Mamen,et al.  A comparison of two physical ability tests for firefighters , 2013, Ergonomics.

[7]  Warren Payne,et al.  Frequency, Intensity, Time And Type Of Tasks Performed During Wildfire Suppression , 2015 .

[8]  Roger Barker,et al.  Measuring the effects of structural turnout suits on firefighter range of motion and comfort , 2017, Ergonomics.

[9]  B. Aisbett,et al.  Oxygen Uptake and Heart Rate during Simulated Wildfire Suppression Tasks Performed by Australian Rural Firefighters , 2015 .

[10]  Joo-Young Lee,et al.  The Impact of Firefighter Personal Protective Equipment and Treadmill Protocol on Maximal Oxygen Uptake , 2013, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[11]  Diane E. Gregory,et al.  Perceived Risk of Low-Back Injury Among Four Occupations , 2016, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Yutaka Tochihara,et al.  Evaluation of the Effects of Various Clothing Conditions on Firefighter Mobility and the Validity of those Measurements Made , 2010 .

[13]  A. Coca,et al.  Physiological Monitoring in Firefighter Ensembles: Wearable Plethysmographic Sensor Vest versus Standard Equipment , 2009, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[14]  Carlo Baldari,et al.  Psychophysiological Responses of Firefighters to Emergencies: A Review , 2014 .

[15]  Denise L Smith,et al.  Evaluation of a Wearable Physiological Status Monitor During Simulated Fire Fighting Activities , 2014, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[16]  Jack P Callaghan,et al.  Physical fitness improvements and occupational low-back loading – an exercise intervention study with firefighters , 2014, Ergonomics.

[17]  J. Medbø,et al.  Energy cost of the Trondheim firefighter test for experienced firefighters. , 2013, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[18]  G. Norman Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics , 2010, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[19]  S. Gallagher,et al.  Physiological demand on firefighters crawling during a search exercise , 2014 .

[20]  Lynn M. Boorady,et al.  Assessment of Firefighters’ needs for personal protective equipment , 2014, Fashion and Textiles.

[21]  Rakié Cham,et al.  The Relationship Between Physical Activity and Thermal Protective Clothing on Functional Balance in Firefighters , 2012, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[22]  Ingvar Holmér,et al.  Test of Firefighter’s Turnout Gear in Hot and Humid Air Exposure , 2006, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[23]  Lucy E. Dorman,et al.  The effects of protective clothing on energy consumption during different activities , 2008, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[24]  J. Patton,et al.  Energy cost of physical task performance in men and women wearing chemical protective clothing. , 2001, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.