Definition and Segmentation of Orchestra Companies

Based on the definition of the European Commission, small enterprises can be defined as companies with less than 50 employees. Medium size companies are companies with less than 250 employees. For small and medium enterprises some research in regards to ERP selection criteria has been done. But this research did not distinguish further in the different behaviors that can be found during the ERP selection process within different types of companies. Different characteristics which appear from an IT operational point of view on how small and medium size businesses organize their IT have not been taken into consideration. This paper gives the definition of a specific group of companies named “orchestra companies” within the SME band. This is done by limiting the quite broad definition of the European commission and applying an IT operational viewpoint. Further the different requirements of orchestra companies in regards to the ERP selection process are formulated. To correlate the ERP selection criteria and the different behaviors from an IT operational point of view, a segmentation of orchestra companies is developed. For each segment the focus on specific ERP selection criteria is discussed.

[1]  Constantinos J. Stefanou,et al.  A framework for the ex-ante evaluation of ERP software , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  I. Lin,et al.  ERP selection for small and medium-sized manufactures , 2006 .

[3]  Shinhong Kim,et al.  An integrated approach for interdependent information system project selection , 2001 .

[4]  Brian W. Hollocks.  Enterprise Resources Planning and Beyond: Integrating Your Entire Organization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[5]  Hong Woo.  Critical success factors for implementing ERP: the case of a Chinese electronics manufacturer , 2007 .

[6]  J. Verville,et al.  A qualitative study of the influencing factors on the decision process for acquiring ERP software , 2002 .

[7]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  SAP R/3 Implementation Issues for Small to Medium Enterprises , 1999 .

[8]  Stefan Koch,et al.  ERP selection process in midsize and large organizations , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[9]  Andy Neely,et al.  A framework of the factors affecting the evolution of performance measurement systems , 2002 .

[10]  Abdullah S. Al-Mudimigh,et al.  ERP implementation: lessons from a case study , 2003, Inf. Technol. People.

[11]  Mario R. Barbacci.  SEI Architecture Analysis Techniques and When to Use them , 2002 .

[12]  Marcello Braglia,et al.  Shortcomings and benefits associated with the implementation of MRP packages: a survey research , 1999 .

[13]  Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah,et al.  Critical factors for successful implementation of enterprise systems , 2001, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[14]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  A DECISION MODEL FOR INTERDEPENDENT INFORMATION SYSTEM PROJECT SELECTION , 1996 .

[15]  Robert C. Beatty,et al.  ERP II , 2006, Commun. ACM.

[16]  Masood A. Badri,et al.  A comprehensive 0-1 goal programming model for project selection , 2001 .

[17]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  The ERP Revolution: Surviving vs. Thriving , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[18]  Rand Bradley.  Push to Pull: How Lean Concepts Improve a Data Migration , 2007, Agile 2007 (AGILE 2007).

[19]  Xavier Burgués Illa,et al.  Formalising ERP selection criteria , 2000, Tenth International Workshop on Software Specification and Design. IWSSD-10 2000.

[20]  Jürgen Ebert,et al.  Ein Vorgehensmodell zur Software-Evaluation , 1994, HMD Prax. Wirtsch..

[21]  Kenneth C. Laudon,et al.  Management Information Systems: New Approaches to Organization and Technology , 1997 .

[22]  Chen-Fu Chien,et al.  An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection , 2005 .