Goal Setting in Family Firms: Goal Diversity, Social Interactions, and Collective Commitment to Family–Centered Goals

Goal setting in family firms is very complex due to the interplay between family and business systems. However, this topic is largely overlooked in family business research. In this qualitative study of goals and goal formulation processes among 76 organizational members across 19 family firms, we identify goal diversity as a direct consequence of the overlap between the family, ownership, and business systems. We found that goal diversity is expressed more strongly in the proximity of generational transitions, triggering social interaction processes through which organizational members contrast their goals. Our findings suggest that different types of social interactions lead to different behaviors, with familial social interactions being more effective than professional social interactions in managing goal diversity toward the formation of collective commitment to family–centered goals.

[1]  Jerome M. Chertkoff,et al.  A bargaining theory of coalition formation. , 1973 .

[2]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Trends and Directions in the Development of a Strategic Management Theory of the Family Firm , 2005 .

[3]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Ebook: Qualitative data analysis , 2013 .

[4]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Defining the Family Business by Behavior , 1999 .

[5]  A. Carsrud.  Commentary: “Are We Family and Are We Treated as Family? Nonfamily Employees’ Perceptions of Justice in the Family Firm”: It All Depends on Perceptions of Family, Fairness, Equity, and Justice , 2006 .

[6]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[7]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[8]  J. Moskowitz,et al.  Positive affect and the other side of coping. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[9]  Pankaj C. Patel,et al.  Variations in R&D Investments of Family and Nonfamily Firms: Behavioral Agency and Myopic Loss Aversion Perspectives , 2012 .

[10]  Patricia Pitcher,et al.  Top Management Team Heterogeneity: Personality, Power, and Proxies , 2001 .

[11]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[12]  Manfred F. R. Kets de Vries,et al.  The dynamics of family controlled firms: The good and the bad news. , 1993 .

[13]  K. Lewin.  Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[14]  Michael G. Jacobides,et al.  The Inherent Limits of Organizational Structure and the Unfulfilled Role of Hierarchy: Lessons from a Near-War , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[15]  David J. Miller,et al.  Pre- and post-succession governance philosophies in entrepreneurial family firms , 2010 .

[16]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Organization design: The case for a coalitional model of organizations , 1977 .

[17]  Carole Howorth,et al.  ‘Types’ of private family firms: an exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis , 2007 .

[18]  H. Simon,et al.  On the concept of organizational goal. , 1964 .

[19]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2018, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[20]  Danny Miller,et al.  Toward an Integrative Model of Effective FOB Succession , 2004 .

[21]  C. Salvato,et al.  Self–Serving or Self–Actualizing? Models of Man and Agency Costs in Different Types of Family Firms: A Commentary on “Comparing the Agency Costs of Family and Non–family Firms: Conceptual Issues and Exploratory Evidence” , 2004 .

[22]  William S. Schulze,et al.  Exploring the Agency Consequences of Ownership Dispersion Among The Directors of Private Family Firms , 2003 .

[23]  Tom Wengraf,et al.  Qualitative Research Interviewing , 2001 .

[24]  S. Floyd,et al.  Managing strategic consensus: the foundation of effective implementation , 1992 .

[25]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  Family Involvement, Family Influence, and Family–Centered Non–Economic Goals in Small Firms , 2012 .

[26]  Alfredo Vittorio De Massis,et al.  Family Business Studies , 2012 .

[27]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Factors Preventing Intra-Family Succession , 2008 .

[28]  Carole Howorth,et al.  The Development of Family Companies: Management and Ownership Imperatives , 2001 .

[29]  Renato Tagiuri,et al.  On the Goals of Successful Family Companies , 1992 .

[30]  D. Hofmann,et al.  The Structure and Function of Collective Constructs: Implications for Multilevel Research and Theory Development , 1999 .

[31]  Paul W. Beamish,et al.  Building Theoretical and Empirical Bridges Across Levels: Multilevel Research in Management , 2007 .

[32]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[33]  A. Massis.  Family Involvement and Procedural Justice Climate Among Nonfamily Managers: The Effects of Affect, Social Identities, Trust, and Risk of Non‐Reciprocity , 2012 .

[34]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  The Concept of “Coalition” in Organization Theory and Research , 1985 .

[35]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Embeddedness Perspectives of Economic Action within Family Firms , 2009 .

[36]  I. MacMillan,et al.  A unified systems perspective of family firm performance , 2003 .

[37]  Karen Locke.  Grounded Theory in Management Research , 2000 .

[38]  D. Harrison,et al.  What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. , 2007 .

[39]  D. Mackinnon.  Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis , 2008 .

[40]  Tom Wengraf.  Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods , 2001 .

[41]  H. Sapienza,et al.  Goal Tolerance, outside Investors, and Family Firm Governance , 2009 .

[42]  Florencio López‐de‐Silanes,et al.  Corporate Ownership Around the World , 1998 .

[43]  Linda Argote,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm - 40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[44]  P. Jaskiewicz,et al.  Emotional Returns and Emotional Costs in Privately Held Family Businesses: Advancing Traditional Business Valuation , 2008 .

[45]  Alfredo Vittorio De Massis,et al.  State-of-the-art of family business research , 2012 .

[46]  D. Paulhus.  Two-component models of socially desirable responding. , 1984 .

[47]  J. Pearce,et al.  Attribution Theory and Strategic Decision Making: An Application to Coalition Formation , 1983 .

[48]  M. Cowling,et al.  The development of family companies , 2001 .

[49]  James J. Chrisman,et al.  Ability and Willingness as Sufficiency Conditions for Family‐Oriented Particularistic Behavior: Implications for Theory and Empirical Studies , 2014 .

[50]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  The Role of Family Ties in Agency Contracts , 2001 .

[51]  Kim S. Cameron,et al.  Measuring Organizational Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher Education. , 1978 .

[52]  M. Shubik,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. , 1964 .