Access to Environmental Stimulation via Eyelid Responses for Persons with Acquired Brain Injury and Multiple Disabilities: A New Microswitch Arrangement

This study assessed a new microswitch arrangement for eyelid responses using an optic sensor placed above the cheekbone and a small sticker on the person's eyelid. This new arrangement, which was designed to avoid interference of the microswitch with the person's visual functioning, was tested on three adults with acquired brain injury and multiple (consciousness, communication, and motor) disabilities. The study was carried out according to a non-concurrent multiple baseline design across participants. Data showed the new microswitch arrangement was suitable for all three participants, who increased their responding during the intervention phase of the study when their responses allowed them to access preferred stimulation. Practical implications of the findings are discussed.

[1]  P. Vietze,et al.  Computer‐assisted learning for adults with profound multiple disabilities , 2004 .

[2]  Ching-Tien Shih,et al.  A new limb movement detector enabling people with multiple disabilities to control environmental stimulation through limb swing with a gyration air mouse. , 2010, Research in developmental disabilities.

[3]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  Technology-based intervention options for post-coma persons with minimally conscious state and pervasive motor disabilities , 2009, Developmental neurorehabilitation.

[4]  Jodie Copley,et al.  Use of a Team-Based Approach to Assistive Technology Assessment and Planning for Children With Multiple Disabilities: A Pilot Study , 2007, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[5]  R. Henson,et al.  Social Validation of Evidence-Based Practices in Autism by Parents, Teachers, and Administrators , 2008, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[6]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  Camera-Based Microswitch Technology to Monitor Mouth, Eyebrow, and Eyelid Responses of Children with Profound Multiple Disabilities , 2011 .

[7]  Alan E. Kazdin,et al.  Behavior modification in applied settings, 6th ed. , 1989 .

[8]  James L Bernat,et al.  Chronic consciousness disorders. , 2009, Annual review of medicine.

[9]  A. E. Kazlxn,et al.  Behavior Modification in Applied Settings , 1975 .

[10]  S. Sacco,et al.  The Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). , 2007, Functional neurology.

[11]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  A technology-assisted learning setup as assessment supplement for three persons with a diagnosis of post-coma vegetative state and pervasive motor impairment. , 2009, Research in developmental disabilities.

[12]  Marta Olivetti Belardinelli,et al.  An overview of intervention options for promoting adaptive behavior of persons with acquired brain injury and minimally conscious state. , 2010, Research in developmental disabilities.

[13]  J. Giacino,et al.  The JFK coma recovery scale—revised , 2005, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[14]  Tom Chau,et al.  A novel integrated mechanomyogram-vocalization access solution. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[15]  R. Adolphs,et al.  Emotion and consciousness , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Mati Joshua,et al.  A noninvasive, fast and inexpensive tool for the detection of eye open/closed state in primates , 2009, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[17]  S. Gutowski.  Response acquisition for music or beverages in adults with profound multiple handicaps , 1996 .

[18]  Giulio E. Lancioni,et al.  Microswitch programs for persons with multiple disabilities: an overview of the responses adopted for microswitch activation , 2005, Cognitive Processing.

[19]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  Technology-assisted messaging opportunities for two persons emerged from a minimally conscious state and showing extensive motor disabilities , 2011, Developmental neurorehabilitation.

[20]  Nathan W. Moon,et al.  Wireless Technologies and Accessibility for People With Disabilities: Findings From a Policy Research Instrument , 2008, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[21]  Matthew Hughes,et al.  Considerations for the use of assistive technology in patients with impaired states of consciousness , 2005, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[22]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  Microswitch-Based Programs for Persons with Multiple Disabilities: An Overview of Some Recent Developments , 2008, Perceptual and motor skills.

[23]  B. S. Hoppestad,et al.  Inadequacies in computer access using assistive technology devices in profoundly disabled individuals: An overview of the current literature , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[24]  Michael Perdices,et al.  Single-Case Experimental Designs , 2014 .

[25]  Linda C. Mechling,et al.  Comparison of the Effects of Three Approaches on the Frequency of Stimulus Activations, via a Single Switch, by Students With Profound Intellectual Disabilities , 2006 .

[26]  Giulio E. Lancioni,et al.  A Microswitch to Enable a Woman with Acquired Brain Injury and Profound Multiple Disabilities to Access Environmental Stimulation with LIP Movements , 2010, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  Joseph T. Giacino,et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic guidelines for the vegwive and minimally conscious states , 2005, Neuropsychological rehabilitation.

[28]  T. Chau,et al.  A multiple camera tongue switch for a child with severe spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[29]  Marcus J Fuhrer,et al.  A Conceptual Framework of Outcomes for Caregivers of Assistive Technology Users , 2009, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[30]  Mark F. O’Reilly,et al.  A new microswitch to enable a boy with minimal motor behavior to control environmental stimulation with eye blinks , 2005 .