The Choquet Integral Analytic Hierarchy Process for Radwaste Repository Site Selection in Taiwan

The Radwaste Repository Site Selection In Taiwan have received considerable continuous improvement by the fuzzy Choquet integral aggregation operator. It allows expressing scenario that are either hosted externally by the repository safety assessment or by the hosting facility which requires a secure zone for its radioactive waste repository. Radioactive waste repository site selection is typical of society-based applications Taiwanese expert analysis has been conducted on different strategic courses of action concerning governmental and society-approved solutions. AHP method makes it possible to evaluate several strategies and to synthesize qualitative and quantitative factors in the decision-making process. This article is a contribution with a Choquet Integral aggregation for optimal improvement. Based on this study it is possible to draw conclusions concerning the best strategic course for a Taiwanese radwaste repository site selection.

[1]  R. Hämäläinen.  A decision aid in the public debate on nuclear power , 1990 .

[2]  Sevin Sozer,et al.  Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach , 2003 .

[3]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[4]  T. Saaty.  Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1994 .

[5]  James E. Campbell,et al.  Risk methodology for geologic disposal of radioactive waste: the DNET Computer Code User's Manual , 1990 .

[6]  Adrien Presley,et al.  R&D project selection using the analytic network process , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[7]  Joseph Sarkis.  A STRATEGIC DECISION FRAMEWORK FOR GREEN SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT , 2003 .

[8]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Applications of the analytic hierarchy process to long range planning processes , 1982 .

[9]  T. Saaty.  Homogeneity and clustering in AHP ensures the validity of the scale , 1994 .

[10]  William M. Bowen,et al.  A Thurstonian comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and probabilistic multidimensional scaling through application to the nuclear waste site selection decision , 1995 .

[11]  Pandu R. Tadikamalla,et al.  Site selection for a ‘sure service terminal’ , 1990 .

[12]  Jizhong Zhu,et al.  Optimal generation scheduling based on AHP/ANP , 2003, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B.

[13]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  Using analytic network process and goal programming for interdependent information system project selection , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[14]  Chen Lin,et al.  Scenario Deployment Of The Analytic Hierarchy Process For The Radwaste Repository Site Selection In Taiwan , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics.