Can employment structure promote environment-biased technical progress?

Environment-biased technical progress can stimulate improvement in environmental quality, leading to coordinated development between the economy and the environment. However, the existing literature scarcely refers to the factors influencing the technical progress bias. We use the overlapping generations model to realize the endogenesis of biased technical progress in the Chinese context. We show that an increase in the aging population will encourage the use of pollution-biased technology and focus the attention of enterprises on improving economic benefits rather than environmental quality. We measure the directions of technical progress during 2003 to 2013 and estimate regressions for the relevant indicators of the labor force employment structure. Under equilibrium, increased ratios of the aging population and state-owned enterprises will stimulate environment-biased technical progress. Further, the effects of research and development and clustering of state-owned enterprises on environmental technology improvement are significant.

[1]  Peter Bogetoft,et al.  Estimating the Potential Gains from Mergers , 2005 .

[2]  W. B. Liu,et al.  DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs , 2010, Ann. Oper. Res..

[3]  David Popp,et al.  Energy, the Environment, and Technological Change , 2009 .

[4]  Hong Huang,et al.  The measurement of undesirable output based-on DEA in E&E: Models development and empirical analysis , 2013, Math. Comput. Model..

[5]  Hengyun Ma,et al.  China's Energy Economy: Technical Change, Factor Demand and Interfactor/Interfuel Substitution , 2008 .

[6]  John Van Reenen,et al.  Wage inequality, technology and trade: 21st century evidence , 2011 .

[7]  David Popp,et al.  Entice: Endogenous Technological Change in the Dice Model of Global Warming , 2003 .

[8]  Jae-Yoon Chang,et al.  The Effects of Income and Skill Utilization on the Underemployed's Self-Esteem, Mental Health, and Life Satisfaction , 2014 .

[9]  D. Acemoglu,et al.  Transition to Clean Technology , 2014, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  Richard G. Richels,et al.  The Attached Material Is Posted on Regulation2point0.org with Permission. the Impact of Learning-by-doing on the Timing and Costs of Co 2 Abatement the Impact of Learning-by-doing on the Timing and Costs of Co 2 Abatement , 2022 .

[11]  P. Aghion,et al.  Carbon Taxes, Path Dependency, and Directed Technical Change: Evidence from the Auto Industry , 2012, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  Kari Leavell,et al.  Career Decision-Making Intervention With Unemployed Adults: When Good Intentions Are Not Effective , 2014 .

[13]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Pollution Abatement and Productivity Growth: Evidence from Germany, Japan, the Netherlands, and the United States , 2009 .

[14]  P. Krugman,et al.  Technology, Trade, and Factor Prices , 1995 .

[15]  P. Aghion,et al.  The Environment and Directed Technical Change , 2009, The American economic review.

[16]  A. Jaffe,et al.  Technological Change and the Environment , 2000 .

[17]  Shiona Chillas,et al.  Learning to Labour: An Evaluation of Internships and Employability in the ICT Sector , 2015 .

[18]  Alpo Willman,et al.  Factor Substitution and Factor-Augmenting Technical Progress in the United States: A Normalized Supply-Side System Approach , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[19]  C. Peroni,et al.  Competition and Innovation in Luxembourg , 2012 .

[20]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Offshoring and Directed Technical Change , 2012 .

[21]  M. Arellano,et al.  Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models , 1995 .

[22]  Fabrizio Cesaroni,et al.  Environmental Technologies in the European Chemical Industry , 2001 .

[23]  Robert C. Feenstra,et al.  Aggregation Bias in the Factor Content of Trade: Evidence from U.S. Manufacturing , 2000 .

[24]  Hengyun Ma,et al.  Substitution possibilities and determinants of energy intensity for China , 2009 .

[25]  A. Harrison.  Has Globalization Eroded Labor’s Share? Some Cross-Country Evidence , 2005 .

[26]  D. Acemoglu.  Equilibrium Bias of Technology , 2005 .

[27]  Lei Ji.  RETHINKING DIRECTED TECHNICAL CHANGE WITH ENDOGENOUS MARKET STRUCTURE , 2013 .

[28]  Alpo Willman,et al.  In Dubio Pro CES: Supply Estimation with Misspecified Technical-Change , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[29]  Emilie Vayre,et al.  A Systemic Approach to Interpersonal Relationships and Activities Among French Teleworkers , 2014 .

[30]  S. Schneider,et al.  Climate Change 2007 Synthesis report , 2008 .

[31]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  The Handbook of Industrial Innovation , 1994 .

[32]  D. Acemoglu.  Labor- and Capital- Augmenting Technical Change , 2000 .

[33]  D. Krantz,et al.  Why Chinese discount future financial and environmental gains but not losses more than Americans , 2014, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty.

[34]  Malin Song,et al.  Review of hidden carbon emissions, trade, and labor income share in China, 2001–2011 , 2014 .

[35]  John Hicks,et al.  The Theory of Wages , 1933 .

[36]  Heinz Welsch,et al.  The determinants of aggregate energy use in West Germany: factor substitution, technological change, and trade , 2005 .

[37]  Substitution between energy, capital and labour within industrial companies : A micro panel data analysis , 2007 .

[38]  Tom-Reiel Heggedal,et al.  A Comment on the Environment and Directed Technical Change , 2012 .