Does Interaction Help Users Better Understand the Structure of Probabilistic Models?

Probabilistic modeling needs specialized tools to support modelers, decision-makers or researchers in the design, checking, refinement and communication of models. Users’ comprehension of probabilistic models is vital in all above cases and interactive visualizations could enhance it. Although there are various studies evaluating interactivity in Bayesian reasoning and available tools for visualizing the inference-related distributions, we focus specifically on evaluating the effect of interaction on users’ comprehension of probabilistic models’ structure. We conducted a user study based on our Interactive Pair Plot for visualizing models’ distribution and conditioning sample space graphically. Our results suggest that improvements in the understanding of the interactive group are most pronounced for more exotic structures, such as hierarchical models or unfamiliar parameterisations in comparison to the static group. As the detail of the inferred information increases, interaction does not lead to considerably longer response times. Finally, interaction improves users’ confidence.

[1]  Quang Vinh Nguyen,et al.  Evaluation on interactive visualization data with scatterplots , 2020, Vis. Informatics.

[2]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  Increasing the Transparency of Research Papers with Explorable Multiverse Analyses , 2019, CHI.

[3]  Carmen Díaz,et al.  Assessing Students’ Difficulties with Conditional Probability and Bayesian Reasoning , 2007, International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education.

[4]  Osvaldo A. Martin,et al.  ArviZ a unified library for exploratory analysis of Bayesian models in Python , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..

[5]  Daniel Afergan,et al.  Improving Bayesian Reasoning: The Effects of Phrasing, Visualization, and Spatial Ability , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[6]  Simon Breslav,et al.  Interactive Instruction in Bayesian Inference , 2018, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[7]  William G. Cole,et al.  Understanding Bayesian reasoning via graphical displays , 1989, CHI '89.

[8]  George Casella,et al.  A Short History of Markov Chain Monte Carlo: Subjective Recollections from Incomplete Data , 2008, 0808.2902.

[9]  G. Gigerenzer,et al.  Teaching Bayesian reasoning in less than two hours. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Alvitta Ottley,et al.  Does Interaction Improve Bayesian Reasoning with Visualization? , 2021, CHI.

[11]  Jennifer Tsai,et al.  Interactive Visualizations to Improve Bayesian Reasoning , 2011 .

[12]  Matthew Kay,et al.  Imagining Replications: Graphical Prediction & Discrete Visualizations Improve Recall & Estimation of Effect Uncertainty , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[13]  Simon Breslav,et al.  Mimic: visual analytics of online micro-interactions , 2014, AVI.

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[15]  Gary L. Brase Pictorial representations in statistical reasoning , 2009 .

[16]  Walter R. Gilks,et al.  A Language and Program for Complex Bayesian Modelling , 1994 .

[17]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  When (ish) is My Bus?: User-centered Visualizations of Uncertainty in Everyday, Mobile Predictive Systems , 2016, CHI.

[18]  Evdoxia Taka,et al.  Increasing Interpretability of Bayesian Probabilistic Programming Models Through Interactive Representations , 2020, Frontiers in Computer Science.

[19]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[20]  Sean A. Munson,et al.  Uncertainty Displays Using Quantile Dotplots or CDFs Improve Transit Decision-Making , 2018, CHI.

[21]  Alvitta Ottley,et al.  Visually Communicating Bayesian Statistics to Laypersons , 2012 .

[22]  Matthew Kay tidybayes: Tidy Data and Geoms for Bayesian Models , 2020 .

[23]  Matthew Kay,et al.  Hypothetical Outcome Plots Help Untrained Observers Judge Trends in Ambiguous Data , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[24]  Aki Vehtari,et al.  Visualization in Bayesian workflow , 2017, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society).

[25]  Pierre Dragicevic,et al.  Assessing the Effect of Visualizations on Bayesian Reasoning through Crowdsourcing , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[26]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques - Adaptive Computation and Machine Learning , 2009 .

[27]  Katharina Reinecke,et al.  Explaining the Gap: Visualizing One's Predictions Improves Recall and Comprehension of Data , 2017, CHI.

[28]  Jessica Hullman,et al.  Designing for Interactive Exploratory Data Analysis Requires Theories of Graphical Inference , 2021, Harvard Data Science Review.

[29]  Emden R. Gansner,et al.  Graphviz and Dynagraph – Static and Dynamic Graph Drawing Tools , 2003 .