Optimal Location of Multi Type Facts Devices for Multiple Contingencies Using Particle Swarm Optimization

In deregulated operating regime power system security is an issue that needs due thoughtfulness from researchers in the horizon of unbundling of generation and transmission. Electric power systems are exposed to various contingencies. Network contingencies often contribute to overloading of branches, violation of voltages and also leading to problems of security/stability. To maintain the security of the systems, it is desirable to estimate the effect of contingencies and pertinent control measurement can be taken on to improve the system security. This paper presents the application of particle swarm optimization algorithm to find the optimal location of multi type FACTS devices in a power system in order to eliminate or alleviate the line over loads. The optimizations are performed on the parameters, namely the location of the devices, their types, their settings and installation cost of FACTS devices for single and multiple contingencies. TCSC, SVC and UPFC are considered and modeled for steady state analysis. The selection of UPFC and TCSC suitable location uses the criteria on the basis of improved system security. The effectiveness of the proposed method is tested for IEEE 6 bus and IEEE 30 bus test systems. Keywords—Contingency Severity Index, Particle Swarm Optimization, Performance Index, Static Security Assessment.

[1]  A. Kazemi,et al.  Power system damping using fuzzy controlled FACTS devices , 2004, 2004 International Conference on Power System Technology, 2004. PowerCon 2004..

[2]  T. A. Mikolinnas,et al.  Contingency Selection of Branch Outages Causing Voltage Problems , 1983, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[3]  Einar Vaughn Larsen,et al.  A thyristor controlled series compensation model for power system stability analysis , 1995 .

[4]  Yoshikazu Fukuyama,et al.  A particle swarm optimization for reactive power and voltage control considering voltage security assessment , 2000 .

[5]  Lawrence Jenkins,et al.  Application of UPFC for system security improvement under normal and network contingencies , 2004 .

[6]  G. Ejebe,et al.  Automatic Contingency Selection , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[7]  M. Saravanan,et al.  Application of particle swarm optimization technique for optimal location of FACTS devices considering cost of installation and system loadability , 2007 .

[8]  B. Wollenberg,et al.  An Advanced Contingency Selection Algorithm , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[9]  Laszlo Gyugyi,et al.  Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems , 1999 .

[10]  Tong Zhu,et al.  TCSC as a transient voltage stabilizing controller , 2001, 2001 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37194).

[11]  R. Eberhart,et al.  Empirical study of particle swarm optimization , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406).

[12]  K. R. Padiyar,et al.  Discrete control of unified power flow controller for stability improvement , 2005 .

[13]  Saman K. Halgamuge,et al.  Self-organizing hierarchical particle swarm optimizer with time-varying acceleration coefficients , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[14]  S. Gerbex,et al.  Optimal Location of Multi-Type FACTS Devices in a Power System by Means of Genetic Algorithms , 2001, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[15]  A. S. Thoke,et al.  International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering 3:16 2008 Fault Classification of Double Circuit Transmission Line Using Artificial Neural Network , 2022 .

[16]  Allen J. Wood,et al.  Power Generation, Operation, and Control , 1984 .

[17]  A. Abur,et al.  Static Security Enhancement via Optimal Utilization of Thyristor Controlled Series Capacitors , 2003, IEEE Power Engineering Review.

[18]  Riccardo Poli,et al.  Particle swarm optimization , 1995, Swarm Intelligence.