Summary A Common Basis Though relatively expensive compared to ray-based migration methods, the methods based on wavefield extrapolation are more accurate in seismic imaging of complex geologic structures. This paper describes implementations of four such related one-way methods for depth migration of prestack and poststack data: phaseshift-plus-interpolation, split-step Fourier, implicit w-x finite-difference, and Fourier finite-difference. All the algorithms work in the frequency domain, resulting in natural and similar parallelization of the codes. These straightforward implementations of one-way methods yield accurate imaging in complicated structures such as the Marmousi model, where most ray-based methods require complicated ray-tracing efforts to image the target-zone. With the advance of computer technology, we expect the above migration methods to play a more important role in the near future, even in the imaging of 3-D prestack data. Let’s start with the 2-D acoustic wave equation. Given a homogeneous velocity structure, in the frequencywavenumber domain we have
[1]
Piero Sguazzero,et al.
Migration of seismic data by phase-shift plus interpolation: Geophysics
,
1984
.
[3]
Dimitri Bevc,et al.
Imaging complex structure with semirecursive Kirchhoff migration
,
1997
.
[4]
D. Nichols.
Maximum energy traveltimes calculated in the seismic frequency band
,
1996
.
[5]
Jenö Gazdag,et al.
Wave equation migration with the phase-shift method
,
1978
.
[6]
D. Ristow,et al.
Fourier finite-difference migration
,
1994
.
[7]
W. Kessinger,et al.
Extended Split-Step Fourier Migration
,
1992
.
[8]
Moshe Reshef,et al.
A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and elastic wave equations
,
1985
.
[9]
Paul L. Stoffa,et al.
Split-Step Fourier Migration
,
1990
.
[10]
Jon F. Claerbout,et al.
Imaging the Earth's Interior
,
1985
.