Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition

Six experiments that were designed to test the adequacy of criterion bias explanations of the word frequency effect and the semantic priming effect are reported. It was found that criterion bias models correctly predicted higher error rates in a lexical decision task for nonwords that were misspelled versions of high-frequency words (e.g., MOHTER), rather than low-frequency words (e.g., BOHTER). Also correct was the prediction of increased error rates for misspelled words preceded by a semantically related word (e.g., NURSE-DOTCOR). However, in a misspelling decision task (in which the subject must decide whether the stimulus is a word, a misspelled word, or a nonword), it can be argued that criterion bias should be inoperative, since correct responses must be delayed until all orthographic information has been checked; this should eliminate both frequency and semantic priming effects. This was found not to be the case; clear frequency and priming effects were obtained for both words and misspelled words.

[1]  K. Forster,et al.  Terminating and exhaustive search in lexical access , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[2]  Stephen J. Antos Processing facilitation in a lexical decision task. , 1979 .

[3]  H. Rubenstein,et al.  Homographic entries in the internal lexicon , 1970 .

[4]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  A Note on the Informativeness of Parts of Words , 1958 .

[5]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  Semantic-context effects on word recognition: Influence of varying the proportion of items presented in an appropriate context , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[6]  Robert F. Stanners,et al.  Frequency and visual quality in a word-nonword classification task , 1975 .

[7]  C. A. Becker Semantic context and word frequency effects in visual word recognition. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  Thomas H. Killion,et al.  Interaction of visual and cognitive effects in word recognition. , 1977 .

[9]  Broadbent De Word-frequency effect and response bias. , 1967 .

[10]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[11]  John J. L. Morton,et al.  Interaction of information in word recognition. , 1969 .

[12]  J. Morton 7 – A Functional Model for Memory1 , 1970 .

[13]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[14]  J. H. Neely Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. , 1977 .

[15]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[16]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. , 1976 .

[17]  Robert F. Stanners,et al.  Analysis of letter strings in word recognition. , 1973 .

[18]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[19]  S. M. Chambers Letter and order information in lexical access , 1979 .

[20]  D E Meyer,et al.  Meaning, memory structure, and mental processes. , 1976, Science.