Water balance‐based actual evapotranspiration reconstruction from ground and satellite observations over the conterminous United States

The objective of this study is to produce an observationally based monthly evapotranspiration (ET) product using the simple water balance equation across the conterminous United States (CONUS). We adopted the best quality ground and satellite‐based observations of the water budget components, i.e., precipitation, runoff, and water storage change, while ET is computed as the residual. Precipitation data are provided by the bias‐corrected PRISM observation‐based precipitation data set, while runoff comes from observed monthly streamflow values at 592 USGS stream gauging stations that have been screened by strict quality controls. We developed a land surface model‐based downscaling approach to disaggregate the monthly GRACE equivalent water thickness data to daily, 0.125° values. The derived ET computed as the residual from the water balance equation is evaluated against three sets of existing ET products. The similar spatial patterns and small differences between the reconstructed ET in this study and the other three products show the reliability of the observationally based approach. The new ET product and the disaggregated GRACE data provide a unique, important hydro‐meteorological data set that can be used to evaluate the other ET products as a benchmark data set, assess recent hydrological and climatological changes, and terrestrial water and energy cycle dynamics across the CONUS. These products will also be valuable for studies and applications in drought assessment, water resources management, and climate change evaluation.

[1]  G. Fogg.  The state and movement of water in living organisms. , 1966, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[2]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models , 1994 .

[3]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Surface soil moisture parameterization of the VIC-2L model: Evaluation and modification , 1996 .

[4]  Y. Xue,et al.  Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations , 1996 .

[5]  W. Kustas,et al.  A verification of the 'triangle' method for obtaining surface soil water content and energy fluxes from remote measurements of the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and surface e , 1997 .

[6]  R. Gillies.  A verification of the 'triangle' method for obtaining surface water content and energy fluxes from remote measurements of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and surface radiant temperature , 1997 .

[7]  L. S. Pereira,et al.  Crop evapotranspiration : guidelines for computing crop water requirements , 1998 .

[8]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[9]  W. Bastiaanssen,et al.  A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL). , 1998 .

[10]  A. Holtslag,et al.  A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL)-1. Formulation , 1998 .

[11]  K. Mitchell,et al.  A parameterization of snowpack and frozen ground intended for NCEP weather and climate models , 1999 .

[12]  R. Koster,et al.  Variance and Predictability of Precipitation at Seasonal-to-Interannual Timescales , 2000 .

[13]  Z. Su.  The Surface Energy Balance System ( SEBS ) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes , 2002 .

[14]  Z. Su.  The Surface Energy Balance System (SEBS) for estimation of turbulent heat fluxes , 2002 .

[15]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  Implementation of Noah land surface model advances in the National Centers for Environmental Prediction operational mesoscale Eta model , 2003 .

[16]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  Development of an evapotranspiration index from Aqua/MODIS for monitoring surface moisture status , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  M. Watkins,et al.  The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results , 2004 .

[18]  J. D. Tarpley,et al.  The multi‐institution North American Land Data Assimilation System (NLDAS): Utilizing multiple GCIP products and partners in a continental distributed hydrological modeling system , 2004 .

[19]  M. Watkins,et al.  GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth System , 2004, Science.

[20]  D. Chambers.  Evaluation of new GRACE time‐variable gravity data over the ocean , 2006 .

[21]  S. Swenson,et al.  Post‐processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data , 2006 .

[22]  S. Swenson,et al.  Accuracy of GRACE mass estimates , 2006 .

[23]  A. Cazenave,et al.  Time variations of the regional evapotranspiration rate from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) satellite gravimetry , 2006 .

[24]  S. Running,et al.  Regional evaporation estimates from flux tower and MODIS satellite data , 2007 .

[25]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Development of a global evapotranspiration algorithm based on MODIS and global meteorology data , 2007 .

[26]  Martha C. Anderson,et al.  A climatological study of evapotranspiration and moisture stress across the continental United States based on thermal remote sensing: 1. Model formulation , 2007 .

[27]  R. Leuning,et al.  Estimating catchment evaporation and runoff using MODIS leaf area index and the Penman‐Monteith equation , 2008 .

[28]  S. Goetz,et al.  Satellite based analysis of northern ET trends and associated changes in the regional water balance from 1983 to 2005 , 2008 .

[29]  C. Daly,et al.  Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States , 2008 .

[30]  S. Chauhan,et al.  Performance Evaluation of Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation Using Climate Based Methods and Artificial Neural Networks , 2009 .

[31]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Global estimates of the land–atmosphere water flux based on monthly AVHRR and ISLSCP-II data, validated at 16 FLUXNET sites , 2008 .

[32]  J. Wang,et al.  A model of surface heat fluxes based on the theory of maximum entropy production , 2009 .

[33]  D. Lettenmaier,et al.  Satellite‐based near‐real‐time estimation of irrigated crop water consumption , 2009 .

[34]  S. Seneviratne,et al.  Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply , 2010, Nature.

[35]  S. Running,et al.  A continuous satellite‐derived global record of land surface evapotranspiration from 1983 to 2006 , 2010 .

[36]  Y. Hong,et al.  Developmentevaluation of an actual evapotranspiration estimation algorithm using satellite remote sensingmeteorological observational network in Oklahoma , 2010 .

[37]  B. Scanlon,et al.  GRACE Hydrological estimates for small basins: Evaluating processing approaches on the High Plains Aquifer, USA , 2010 .

[38]  Evaluation of Global Daily Reference ET Using Oklahoma’s Environmental Monitoring Network—MESONET , 2011 .

[39]  Jingfeng Wang,et al.  A model of evapotranspiration based on the theory of maximum entropy production , 2011 .

[40]  L. You,et al.  Agricultural water productivity assessment for the Yellow River Basin , 2011 .

[41]  A. Physique.  Water Resources Research , 2011 .

[42]  Maosheng Zhao,et al.  Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm , 2011 .

[43]  J. Kimball,et al.  A new global river network database for macroscale hydrologic modeling , 2012 .

[44]  P. Ciais,et al.  Global evapotranspiration over the past three decades: estimation based on the water balance equation combined with empirical models , 2012 .

[45]  Dingbao Wang,et al.  Responses of annual runoff, evaporation, and storage change to climate variability at the watershed scale , 2012 .

[46]  F. Landerer,et al.  Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage estimates , 2012 .

[47]  K. Mo,et al.  Continental-scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for the North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS-2): 1. Intercomparison and application of model products , 2012 .

[48]  M. Ek,et al.  Continental‐scale water and energy flux analysis and validation for North American Land Data Assimilation System project phase 2 (NLDAS‐2): 2. Validation of model‐simulated streamflow , 2012 .

[49]  B. Scanlon,et al.  GRACE satellite monitoring of large depletion in water storage in response to the 2011 drought in Texas , 2013 .

[50]  G. Senay,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of two MODIS evapotranspiration products over the conterminous United States: Using point and gridded FLUXNET and water balance ET , 2013 .

[51]  Kecheng Zhang,et al.  Sensitivity of inferred climate model skill to evaluation decisions: a case study using CMIP5 evapotranspiration , 2013 .

[52]  J. Ardö,et al.  A Surface Temperature Initiated Closure (STIC) for surface energy balance fluxes , 2014 .

[53]  B. Scanlon,et al.  Uncertainty in evapotranspiration from land surface modeling, remote sensing, and GRACE satellites , 2014 .

[54]  M. Ek,et al.  Evaluation of NLDAS‐2 evapotranspiration against tower flux site observations , 2015 .