Nucleosome packaging and nucleosome positioning of genomic DNA.

The goals of this study were to assess the extent to which bulk genomic DNA sequences contribute to their own packaging in nucleosomes and to reveal the relationship between nucleosome packaging and positioning. Using a competitive nucleosome reconstitution assay, we found that at least 95% of bulk DNA sequences have an affinity for histone octamer in nucleosomes that is similar to that of randomly synthesized DNA; they contribute little to their own packaging at the level of individual nucleosomes. An equation was developed that relates the measured free energy to the fractional occupancy of specific nucleosome positions. Evidently, the bulk of eukaryotic genomic DNA is also not evolved or constrained for significant sequence-directed nucleosome positioning at the level of individual nucleosomes. Implications for gene regulation in vivo are discussed.

[1]  M. Borodovsky,et al.  Nucleosome DNA sequence pattern revealed by multiple alignment of experimentally mapped sequences. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  D M Crothers,et al.  Bent helical structure in kinetoplast DNA. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  E. Bradbury,et al.  Mobility of positioned nucleosomes on 5 S rDNA. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  J. Widom,et al.  Nucleosome transcription studied in a real-time synchronous system: test of the lexosome model and direct measurement of effects due to histone octamer. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  J. Widom,et al.  Twist constraints on linker DNA in the 30-nm chromatin fiber: implications for nucleosome phasing. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  D M Crothers,et al.  Artificial nucleosome positioning sequences. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  J. Widom,et al.  A model for the cooperative binding of eukaryotic regulatory proteins to nucleosomal target sites. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  J. Widom.  Bent DNA for gene regulation and DNA packaging , 1985 .

[9]  J. Widom,et al.  A relationship between the helical twist of DNA and the ordered positioning of nucleosomes in all eukaryotic cells. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  T Koller,et al.  DNA structural patterns and nucleosome positioning. , 1994, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[11]  K. V. van Holde,et al.  DNA and protein determinants of nucleosome positioning on sea urchin 5S rRNA gene sequences in vitro. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  P. Becker,et al.  Energy‐dependent chromatin accessibility and nucleosome mobility in a cell‐free system. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[13]  C. Tuerk,et al.  SELEXION. Systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment with integrated optimization by non-linear analysis. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  D. Bartel,et al.  Isolation of new ribozymes from a large pool of random sequences [see comment]. , 1993, Science.

[15]  P. V. Hippel,et al.  Protein-DNA recognition: new perspectives and underlying themes , 1994 .

[16]  L. Stryer,et al.  Statistical distributions of nucleosomes: nonrandom locations by a stochastic mechanism. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  J. Widom.  Short-range order in two eukaryotic genomes: relation to chromosome structure. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  S. Muyldermans,et al.  A DNA sequence for positioning chromatosomes. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  D. Crothers,et al.  Effects of DNA sequence and histone-histone interactions on nucleosome placement. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  J. Widom.  Physicochemical studies of the folding of the 100 A nucleosome filament into the 300 A filament. Cation dependence. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  Alexander Bolshoy,et al.  CC dinucleotides contribute to the bending of DNA in chromatin , 1995, Nature Structural Biology.

[22]  R. Simpson,et al.  Nucleosome positioning: occurrence, mechanisms, and functional consequences. , 1991, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[23]  A. Wolffe,et al.  A positive role for nucleosome mobility in the transcriptional activity of chromatin templates: restriction by linker histones. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[24]  R. Simpson,et al.  Structural features of a phased nucleosome core particle. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  A. Klug,et al.  The bending of DNA in nucleosomes and its wider implications. , 1987, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[26]  J. Widom,et al.  Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  M. Bina,et al.  Periodicity of dinucleotides in nucleosomes derived from simian virus 40 chromatin. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  P. Hagerman,et al.  Sequence-directed curvature of DNA. , 1986, Nature.

[29]  J. Widom,et al.  Lifetime of the histone octamer studied by continuous-flow quasielastic light scattering: test of a model for nucleosome transcription. , 1993, Biochemistry.

[30]  J. Widom,et al.  Direct detection of linker DNA bending in defined-length oligomers of chromatin. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  E. M. Bradbury,et al.  Mobile nucleosomes‐‐a general behavior. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[32]  R. Simpson.  Structure of the chromatosome, a chromatin particle containing 160 base pairs of DNA and all the histones. , 1978, Biochemistry.