Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and in the USA – a comparative analysis

Flood risk management in Europe and worldwide is not static but constantly in a state of flux. There has been a trend towards more integrated flood risk management in many countries. However, the initial situation and the pace and direction of change is very different in the various countries. In this paper, we will present a conceptual framework that seeks to explain why countries opt for different flood risk management portfolios. The developed framework utilises insights from a range of policy science concepts in an integrated way and considers, among others, factors such as geographical characteristics, the experience with flood disasters, as well as human behavioural aspects.

[1]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Improvements on Flood Alleviation in Germany: Lessons Learned from the Elbe Flood in August 2002 , 2006, Environmental management.

[2]  Dave Huitema,et al.  Understanding and managing water transitions: a policy science perspective , 2009 .

[3]  P. Haas.  Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination , 1992, International Organization.

[4]  Thomas A. Birkland,et al.  An Introduction to the Policy Process: Theories, Concepts and Models of Public Policy Making , 2001 .

[5]  Edmund C. Penning-Rowsell,et al.  The evolution of UK flood insurance: incremental change over six decades , 2014 .

[6]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Development of flood exposure in the Netherlands during the 20th and 21st century , 2011 .

[7]  E. Penning‐Rowsell,et al.  The distributional consequences of future flood risk management in England and Wales , 2015 .

[8]  Bruno Merz,et al.  Insurability and Mitigation of Flood Losses in Private Households in Germany , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[10]  Raymond J. Burby,et al.  Flood insurance and floodplain management: the US experience , 2001 .

[11]  Paul A. Sabatier,et al.  The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe , 1998 .

[12]  P. Bubeck,et al.  Future flood risk estimates along the river Rhine , 2011 .

[13]  P. Bubeck,et al.  Changes in future flood risk due to climate and development in a Dutch polder area , 2010 .

[14]  Anne Loeber,et al.  Theories of Policy Learning: Agency, Structure, and Change , 2006 .

[15]  Douglass C. North,et al.  Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance: Organizations, learning, and institutional change , 1990 .

[16]  Bryan D. Jones,et al.  Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking , 2006 .

[17]  D. Huitema,et al.  Transboundary flood management in the Rhine basin: challenges for improved cooperation. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[18]  Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts,et al.  Long-term development and effectiveness of private flood mitigation measures: an analysis for the German part of the river Rhine , 2012 .

[19]  Frans Klijn,et al.  Flood-risk management strategies for an uncertain future: living with Rhine River floods in The Netherlands? , 2004, Ambio.

[20]  B. Merz,et al.  Recent changes in flood preparedness of private households and businesses in Germany , 2011 .

[21]  E. Penning‐Rowsell,et al.  ‘Signals’ from pre-crisis discourse: Lessons from UK flooding for global environmental policy change? , 2006 .

[22]  D. Easton.  An Approach to the Analysis of Political Systems , 1957, World Politics.

[23]  S. Meijerink.  Understanding policy stability and change. the interplay of advocacy coalitions and epistemic communities, windows of opportunity, and Dutch coastal flooding policy 1945–20031 , 2005 .

[24]  H. Moel,et al.  Flood maps in Europe – methods, availability and use , 2009 .

[25]  R. Burby.  Hurricane Katrina and the Paradoxes of Government Disaster Policy: Bringing About Wise Governmental Decisions for Hazardous Areas , 2006 .

[26]  Paul Samuels,et al.  Towards flood risk management in the EU: State of affairs with examples from various European countries , 2008 .

[27]  S. Meijerink,et al.  Water safety and spatial development: An institutional comparison between the United Kingdom and the Netherlands , 2014 .

[28]  Frans Klijn,et al.  Assessment of the Netherlands’ Flood Risk Management Policy Under Global Change , 2012, AMBIO.

[29]  Jessica Ludy,et al.  Flood risk perception in lands “protected” by 100-year levees , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[30]  E. Penning‐Rowsell,et al.  Victim pressure, institutional inertia and climate change adaptation: The case of flood risk , 2011 .

[31]  J. Kwadijk,et al.  Using adaptation tipping points to prepare for climate change and sea level rise: a case study in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[32]  J. Aerts,et al.  Flood‐resilient waterfront development in New York City: Bridging flood insurance, building codes, and flood zoning , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Stéphane Hallegatte,et al.  An Adaptive Regional Input‐Output Model and its Application to the Assessment of the Economic Cost of Katrina , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[34]  Edmund C. Penning-Rowsell,et al.  Floods as Catalysts for Policy Change: Historical Lessons from England and Wales , 2005 .

[35]  Stephane Hallegatte,et al.  Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change , 2009 .

[36]  F. Klijn,et al.  Resilience strategies for flood risk management in the Netherlands , 2003 .

[37]  J. Lamond,et al.  Cities and Flooding: A Guide to Integrated Urban Flood Risk Management for the 21st Century , 2012 .