Crafting Rules: Context-Reflective Data Quality Problem Solving

Motivated by the growing importance of data quality in data-intensive, global business environments and by burgeoning data quality activities, this study builds a conceptual model of data quality problem solving. The study analyzes data quality activities at five organizations via a five-year longitudinal study. The study finds that experienced practitioners solve data quality problems by reflecting on and explicating knowledge about contexts embedded in, or missing from, data. Specifically, these individuals investigate how data problems are framed, analyzed, and resolved throughout the entire information discourse. Their discourse on contexts of data, therefore, connects otherwise separately managed data processes, that is, collection, storage, and use. Practitioners' context-reflective mode of problem solving plays a pivotal role in crafting data quality rules. These practitioners break old rules and revise actionable dominant logic embedded in work routines as a strategy for crafting rules in data quality problem solving.

[1]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[2]  R. Daft,et al.  Toward a Model of Organizations as Interpretation Systems , 1984 .

[3]  S. Kraemer Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Gregory Bateson , 1993, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[4]  N. Smelser,et al.  Handbook of Economic Sociology , 1994 .

[5]  N. Smelser,et al.  Annual Review of Sociology , 1975 .

[6]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance , 1986 .

[7]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[8]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[9]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Learning from Experience in Organizations , 1985 .

[10]  Allen S. Lee A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies , 1989, MIS Q..

[11]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  How learning by doing is done: problem identification in novel process equipment☆ , 1995 .

[12]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Data Quality Assessment , 2002 .

[13]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[15]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Research in the Sociology of Organization. , 1994 .

[16]  T. G.,et al.  Logic in Practice , 1934, Nature.

[17]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[18]  A. Giddens NEW RULES OF SOCIOLOGICAL METHOD , 1980 .

[19]  A. Donnellon,et al.  Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action. , 1986 .

[20]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  Dynamic Memory Revisited , 1999 .

[21]  C. Calhoun,et al.  Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives , 1994 .

[22]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Learning to Specify Information Requirements: The Relationship between Application and Methodology , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[24]  Peter Rob,et al.  Database Systems , 1993 .

[25]  K. Weick The social psychology of organizing , 1969 .

[26]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[27]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[28]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[29]  R. Yin Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[30]  Allen Newell,et al.  Human Problem Solving. , 1973 .

[31]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation : The case of R&D , 1997 .

[32]  Minder Chen,et al.  A Model-Driven Approach to Accessing Managerial Information: The Development of a Repository-Based Executive Information System , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Massimo Marraffa,et al.  Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice , 1998 .

[34]  G. Morgan,et al.  Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research. , 1984 .

[35]  Cheri Ostroff,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL SOCIALIZATION AS A LEARNING PROCESS: THE ROLE OF INFORMATION ACQUISITION , 2006 .

[36]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[37]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Anchoring data quality dimensions in ontological foundations , 1996, CACM.

[38]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[39]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[40]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[41]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Information Technology Competence of Business Managers: A Definition and Research Model , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Manage Your Information as a Product , 1998 .

[43]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Knowing-Why About Data Processes and Data Quality , 2004 .

[44]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  Managing for the Future: Organizational Behavior and Processes , 1998 .

[45]  Peter Rob,et al.  Database systems : design, implementation, and management , 2000 .

[46]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Quality information and knowledge , 1998 .

[47]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[48]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  The Organizational Transformation Process: The Micropolitics of Dissonance Reduction and the Allignment of Logics of Action , 1996 .

[49]  R. Daft,et al.  How Organizations Learn: A Communication Framework. , 1986 .

[50]  C. J. Date Referential Integrity , 1981, VLDB.

[51]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Integrating information from global systems: Dealing with the "on- and off-ramps"; of the information superhighway , 1995, J. Organ. Comput..

[52]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[53]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  A model of adaptive organizational search , 1981 .

[54]  BoudreauMarie-Claude,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology , 1999 .

[55]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[56]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[57]  Richard Y. Wang,et al.  Modeling Information Manufacturing Systems to Determine Information Product Quality Management Scien , 1998 .

[58]  L. Zucker Institutional patterns and organizations : culture and environment , 1989 .

[59]  R. Baskerville Conducting action research: high risk and high reward in theory and practice , 2001 .

[60]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[61]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[62]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[63]  James Brian Quinn,et al.  Innovation Explosion : Using Intellect and Software to Revolutionize Growth Strategies , 1997 .

[64]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link : how firms compete through strategic alliances / Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. , 1993 .

[65]  Arthur J. Jacobson,et al.  The Game of the Laws , 1999 .

[66]  R. E. Miles,et al.  Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms , 1986 .

[67]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[68]  David C Lester,et al.  Culture and the Economy , 2000, Psychological reports.

[69]  Israel Spiegler,et al.  Natural Language Access to Multiple Databases: A Model and a Prototype , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[70]  Jay R. Galbraith Organization Design: An Information Processing View , 1974 .

[71]  Sevgin Eroğlu,et al.  Book Review: The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances , 1993 .

[72]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study , 1994 .

[73]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Data quality in context , 1997, CACM.

[74]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning II: Theory, Method, and Practice , 1995 .

[75]  Richard Reviewer-Granger Unified Theories of Cognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[76]  D. Dougherty,et al.  Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. , 1996 .

[77]  Paul DiMaggio Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[78]  Yang W. Lee,et al.  Understanding Hidden Interdependencies between Information and Organizational Processes in Practice , 2002, ICIQ.

[79]  E. Trauth Qualitative Research in IS: Issues and Trends , 2001 .

[80]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[81]  E. F. Codd,et al.  The Relational Model for Database Management, Version 2 , 1990 .

[82]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[83]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[84]  L. A. Hausman How we Think , 1921 .

[85]  Gary James Jason,et al.  The Logic of Scientific Discovery , 1988 .

[86]  C. Ozawa Science in Environmental Conflicts , 1996 .