The Nazca‐South America convergence rate and the recurrence of the Great 1960 Chilean Earthquake

The seismic slip rate along the Chile Trench estimated from the slip in the great 1960 earthquake and the recurrence history of major earthquakes has been interpreted as consistent with the subduction rate of the Nazca plate beneath South America. The convergence rate, estimated from global relative plate motion models, depends significantly on closure of the Nazca - Antarctica - South America circuit. NUVEL-1, a new plate motion model which incorporates recently determined spreading rates on the Chile Rise, shows that the average convergence rate over the last three million years is slower than previously estimated. If this time-averaged convergence rate provides an appropriate upper bound for the seismic slip rate, either the characteristic Chilean subduction earthquake is smaller than the 1960 event, the average recurrence interval is greater than observed in the last 400 years, or both. These observations bear out the nonuniformity of plate motions on various time scales, the variability in characteristic subduction zone earthquake size, and the limitations of recurrence time estimates.

[1]  S. Stein,et al.  Comment on “Subduction of aseismic ridges beneath the Caribbean Plate: Implications for the tectonics and seismic potential of the northeastern Caribbean” by W. R. McCann and L. R. Sykes , 1986 .

[2]  W. Dillon,et al.  Resource potential of the western North Atlantic Basin , 1986 .

[3]  P. Vogt,et al.  The Western North Atlantic Region , 1986 .

[4]  Stuart P. Nishenko,et al.  Seismic potential for large and great interplate earthquakes along the Chilean and Southern Peruvian Margins of South America: A quantitative reappraisal , 1985 .

[5]  L. Sykes,et al.  Subduction of aseismic ridges beneath the Caribbean Plate: Implications for the tectonics and seismic potential of the northeastern Caribbean , 1984 .

[6]  H. Kanamori,et al.  VARIABLE RUPTURE MODE OF THE SUBDUCTION ZONE ALONG THE ECUADOR-COLOMBIA COAST , 1982 .

[7]  W. B. Harland,et al.  A Geologic time scale , 1982 .

[8]  H. Kanamori,et al.  Double seismic zones and stresses of intermediate depth earthquakes , 1981 .

[9]  S. Cande,et al.  An active spreading center collides with a subduction zone: A geophysical survey of the Chile Margin triple junction , 1981 .

[10]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Seismicity and the subduction process , 1980 .

[11]  K. Abe.  Size of great earthquakes of 1837–1974 inferred from tsunami data , 1979 .

[12]  C. G. Chase.  Plate kinematics: The Americas, East Africa, and the rest of the world , 1978 .

[13]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Present‐day plate motions , 1977 .

[14]  M. Ando.  Source mechanisms and tectonic significance of historical earthquakes along the nankai trough, Japan , 1975 .

[15]  T. Jordan,et al.  Numerical Modelling of Instantaneous Plate Tectonics , 1974 .

[16]  Hiroo Kanamori,et al.  Focal process of the great Chilean earthquake May 22, 1960☆ , 1974 .

[17]  J. Mudie,et al.  Fast sea-floor spreading on the Chile Ridge , 1973 .

[18]  W. Stauder.  Mechanism and spatial distribution of Chilean earthquakes with relation to subduction of the oceanic plate , 1973 .

[19]  C. G. Chase.  The N Plate Problem of Plate Tectonics , 1972 .

[20]  John Kelleher,et al.  Rupture zones of large South American earthquakes and some predictions , 1972 .

[21]  G. Plafker,et al.  Alaskan Earthquake of 1964 and Chilean Earthquake of 1960: Implications for Arc Tectonics , 1972 .

[22]  C. Lomnitz.  Major earthquakes and tsunamis in Chile during the period 1535 to 1955 , 1970 .

[23]  D. McKenzie.  Speculations on the Consequences and Causes of Plate Motions , 1969 .

[24]  F. Press,et al.  Excitation of the free oscillations of the Earth by earthquakes , 1961 .