Vegetation height products between 60° S and 60° N from ICESat GLAS data.

We present new coarse resolution (0.5� ×0.5�)vegetation height and vegetation-cover fraction data sets between 60� S and 60� N for use in climate models and ecological models. The data sets are derived from 2003–2009 measurements collected by the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) on the Ice, Cloud and land Elevation Satellite (ICESat), the only LiDAR instrument that provides close to global coverage. Initial vegetation height is calculated from GLAS data using a development of the model of Rosette et al. (2008) with further calibration on desert sites. Filters are developed to identify and eliminate spurious observations in the GLAS data, e.g. data that are affected by clouds, atmosphere and terrain and as such result in erroneous estimates of vegetation height or vegetation cover. Filtered GLAS vegetation height estimates are aggregated in histograms from 0 to 70m in 0.5m intervals for each 0.5�×0.5�. The GLAS vegetation height product is evaluated in four ways. Firstly, the Vegetation height data and data filters are evaluated using aircraft LiDAR measurements of the same for ten sites in the Americas, Europe, and Australia. Application of filters to the GLAS vegetation height estimates increases the correlation with aircraft data from r =0.33 to r =0.78, decreases the root-mean-square error by a factor 3 to about 6m (RMSE) or 4.5m (68% error distribution) and decreases the bias from 5.7m to −1.3 m. Secondly, the global aggregated GLAS vegetation height product is tested for sensitivity towards the choice of data quality filters; areas with frequent cloud cover and areas with steep terrain are the most sensitive to the choice of thresholds for the filters. The changes in height estimates by applying different filters are, for the main part, smaller than the overall uncertainty of 4.5–6m established from the site measurements. Thirdly, the GLAS global vegetation height product is compared with a global vegetation height product typically used in a climate model, a recent global tree height product, and a vegetation greenness product and is shown to produce realistic estimates of vegetation height. Finally, the GLAS bare soil cover fraction is compared globally with the MODIS bare soil fraction (r = 0.65) and with bare soil cover fraction estimates derived from AVHRR NDVI data (r =0.67); the GLAS treecover fraction is compared with the MODIS tree-cover fraction (r =0.79). The evaluation indicates that filters applied to the GLAS data are conservative and eliminate a large proportion of spurious data, while only in a minority of cases at the cost of removing reliable data as well. The new GLAS vegetation height product appears more realistic than previous data sets used in climate models and ecological models and hence should significantly improve simulations that involve the land surface.

[1]  Andrew Jarvis,et al.  Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4 , 2008 .

[2]  S. Los,et al.  Uncertainty within satellite LiDAR estimations of vegetation and topography , 2010 .

[3]  Christopher O. Justice,et al.  Monitoring the grasslands of the Sahel 1984-1985 , 1986 .

[4]  M. Lefsky.  A global forest canopy height map from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer and the Geoscience Laser Altimeter System , 2010 .

[5]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  Radiative transfer modeling of direct and diffuse sunlight in a Siberian pine forest , 2005 .

[6]  J. Randerson,et al.  Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004 , 2006 .

[7]  D. Harding,et al.  ICESat waveform measurements of within‐footprint topographic relief and vegetation vertical structure , 2005 .

[8]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Above-ground biomass estimation in closed canopy Neotropical forests using lidar remote sensing: factors affecting the generality of relationships , 2003 .

[9]  J. Townshend,et al.  Global Percent Tree Cover at a Spatial Resolution of 500 Meters: First Results of the MODIS Vegetation Continuous Fields Algorithm , 2003 .

[10]  H. Zwally,et al.  Overview of ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice, Atmosphere, Ocean, and Land , 2002 .

[11]  A. J. Dolman,et al.  The carbon uptake of a mid latitude pine forest growing on sandy soil , 2002 .

[12]  Ross A. Hill,et al.  Proceedings of SilviLaser 2008, 8th international conference on LiDAR applications in forest assessment and inventory, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK, 17-19 September, 2008. , 2008 .

[13]  N. Gobron,et al.  Monitoring the photosynthetic activity of vegetation from remote sensing data , 2006 .

[14]  Alan G. Barr,et al.  Surface energy balance closure by the eddy-covariance method above three boreal forest stands and implications for the measurement of the CO2 flux , 2006 .

[15]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  A Monte Carlo radiative transfer model of satellite waveform LiDAR , 2010 .

[16]  Doreen S. Boyd,et al.  Relationship between canopy height and Landsat ETM+ response in lowland Amazonian rainforest , 2011 .

[17]  Ranga B. Myneni,et al.  User's Guide FPAR, LAI (ESDT: MOD15A2) 8-day Composite NASA MODIS Land Algorithm , 2003 .

[18]  J. Spinhirne,et al.  Cloud and aerosol measurements from GLAS: Overview and initial results , 2005 .

[19]  F. Hall,et al.  Global Crop Forecasting , 1980, Science.

[20]  Sarah M. Brown,et al.  Characterizing vegetation structural and topographic characteristics sampled by eddy covariance within two mature aspen stands using LiDAR and a flux footprint model: Scaling to MODIS , 2011 .

[21]  S. Prince.  Satellite remote sensing of primary production: comparison of results for Sahelian grasslands 1981-1988 , 1991 .

[22]  C. Justice,et al.  A Revised Land Surface Parameterization (SiB2) for Atmospheric GCMS. Part II: The Generation of Global Fields of Terrestrial Biophysical Parameters from Satellite Data , 1996 .

[23]  W. Cohen,et al.  Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat , 2005 .

[24]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  Vegetation height estimates for a mixed temperate forest using satellite laser altimetry , 2008 .

[25]  H. Zwally.  ICESat's Laser Measurements of Polar Ice and Atmospheres , 2003 .

[26]  Natascha Kljun,et al.  Influences of vegetation structure and elevation on CO2 uptake in a mature jack pine forest in Saskatchewan, Canada , 2008 .

[27]  R. Nelson,et al.  Estimating Siberian timber volume using MODIS and ICESat/GLAS. , 2009 .

[28]  Christian Bernhofer,et al.  A decade of carbon, water and energy flux measurements of an old spruce forest at the Anchor Station Tharandt , 2007 .

[29]  Limin Yang,et al.  Development of a global land cover characteristics database and IGBP DISCover from 1 km AVHRR data , 2000 .

[30]  Barry Gardiner,et al.  A practical application of airborne LiDAR for forestry management in Scotland , 2008 .

[31]  Damien Sulla-Menashe,et al.  MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets , 2010 .

[32]  K. Jon Ranson,et al.  Imaging radar for ecosystem studies , 1995 .

[33]  A. G. Barr,et al.  Response of Net Ecosystem Productivity of Three Boreal Forest Stands to Drought , 2006, Ecosystems.

[34]  C. Tucker,et al.  A Global 9-yr Biophysical Land Surface Dataset from NOAA AVHRR Data , 2000 .

[35]  R. Leuning,et al.  Carbon and water fluxes over a temperate Eucalyptus forest and a tropical wet/dry savanna in Australia: measurements and comparison with MODIS remote sensing estimates , 2005 .