Modeling Core Metabolism in Cancer Cells: Surveying the Topology Underlying the Warburg Effect

Background Alterations on glucose consumption and biosynthetic activity of amino acids, lipids and nucleotides are metabolic changes for sustaining cell proliferation in cancer cells. Irrevocable evidence of this fact is the Warburg effect which establishes that cancer cells prefers glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation to generate ATP. Regulatory action over metabolic enzymes has opened a new window for designing more effective anti-cancer treatments. This enterprise is not trivial and the development of computational models that contribute to identifying potential enzymes for breaking the robustness of cancer cells is a priority. Methodology/Principal Findings This work presents a constraint-base modeling of the most experimentally studied metabolic pathways supporting cancer cells: glycolysis, TCA cycle, pentose phosphate, glutaminolysis and oxidative phosphorylation. To evaluate its predictive capacities, a growth kinetics study for Hela cell lines was accomplished and qualitatively compared with in silico predictions. Furthermore, based on pure computational criteria, we concluded that a set of enzymes (such as lactate dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase) perform a pivotal role in cancer cell growth, findings supported by an experimental counterpart. Conclusions/Significance Alterations on metabolic activity are crucial to initiate and sustain cancer phenotype. In this work, we analyzed the phenotype capacities emerged from a constructed metabolic network conformed by the most experimentally studied pathways sustaining cancer cell growth. Remarkably, in silico model was able to resemble the physiological conditions in cancer cells and successfully identified some enzymes currently studied by its therapeutic effect. Overall, we supplied evidence that constraint-based modeling constitutes a promising computational platform to: 1) integrate high throughput technology and establish a crosstalk between experimental validation and in silico prediction in cancer cell phenotype; 2) explore the fundamental metabolic mechanism that confers robustness in cancer; and 3) suggest new metabolic targets for anticancer treatments. All these issues being central to explore cancer cell metabolism from a systems biology perspective.

[1]  O. Warburg [Origin of cancer cells]. , 1956, Oncologia.

[2]  R. Weinberg,et al.  The Biology of Cancer , 2006 .

[3]  B. Palsson,et al.  Stoichiometric flux balance models quantitatively predict growth and metabolic by-product secretion in wild-type Escherichia coli W3110 , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[4]  G. Semenza,et al.  Oncogenic alterations of metabolism. , 1999, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[5]  D. Hanahan,et al.  The Hallmarks of Cancer , 2000, Cell.

[6]  Pedro de Atauri,et al.  Metabolic control analysis in drug discovery and disease , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[7]  B. Palsson,et al.  Transcriptional regulation in constraints-based metabolic models of Escherichia coli Covert , 2002 .

[8]  B. Palsson,et al.  Uniform sampling of steady-state flux spaces: means to design experiments and to interpret enzymopathies. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[9]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  Integrating high-throughput and computational data elucidates bacterial networks , 2004, Nature.

[10]  R. Gillies,et al.  Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[11]  B. Palsson,et al.  Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints , 2004, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[12]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Biological robustness , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[13]  H. J. Greenberg,et al.  Monte Carlo sampling can be used to determine the size and shape of the steady-state flux space. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Peng Huang,et al.  Inhibition of glycolysis in cancer cells: a novel strategy to overcome drug resistance associated with mitochondrial respiratory defect and hypoxia. , 2005, Cancer research.

[15]  Daniel E Bauer,et al.  ATP citrate lyase inhibition can suppress tumor cell growth. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[16]  Eyal Gottlieb,et al.  Mitochondrial tumour suppressors: a genetic and biochemical update , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[17]  Ken Garber,et al.  Energy Deregulation: Licensing Tumors to Grow , 2006, Science.

[18]  Oksana Gavrilova,et al.  p53 Regulates Mitochondrial Respiration , 2006, Science.

[19]  Igor Jurisica,et al.  Gene Expression Profiling in Cervical Cancer: An Exploration of Intratumor Heterogeneity , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  Marta Cascante,et al.  Pentose phosphate cycle oxidative and nonoxidative balance: A new vulnerable target for overcoming drug resistance in cancer , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[21]  R. Shaw,et al.  Glucose metabolism and cancer. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[22]  B. Palsson Systems Biology: Properties of Reconstructed Networks , 2006 .

[23]  P. Leder,et al.  Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance. , 2006, Cancer cell.

[24]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0 , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[25]  Bernhard O. Palsson,et al.  Metabolic Reconstruction and Modeling of Nitrogen Fixation in Rhizobium etli , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[26]  R. Deberardinis,et al.  Beyond aerobic glycolysis: Transformed cells can engage in glutamine metabolism that exceeds the requirement for protein and nucleotide synthesis , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Monica L. Mo,et al.  Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Ralph J Deberardinis,et al.  Brick by brick: metabolism and tumor cell growth. , 2008, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[29]  Ru Wei,et al.  The M2 splice isoform of pyruvate kinase is important for cancer metabolism and tumour growth , 2008, Nature.

[30]  Robert A. Harris,et al.  Pyruvate Dehydrogenase Complex Activity Controls Metabolic and Malignant Phenotype in Cancer Cells* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  The growing scope of applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions using Escherichia coli , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[32]  D. Sabatini,et al.  Cancer Cell Metabolism: Warburg and Beyond , 2008, Cell.

[33]  L. Cantley,et al.  Understanding the Warburg Effect: The Metabolic Requirements of Cell Proliferation , 2009, Science.

[34]  Bernhard O. Palsson,et al.  Metabolic systems biology , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[35]  Ines Thiele,et al.  Three-Dimensional Structural View of the Central Metabolic Network of Thermotoga maritima , 2009, Science.

[36]  Kevin M. Ryan,et al.  p53 and metabolism , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[37]  O. Reséndis-Antonio Filling Kinetic Gaps: Dynamic Modeling of Metabolism Where Detailed Kinetic Information Is Lacking , 2009, PloS one.

[38]  Adam M. Feist,et al.  Reconstruction of biochemical networks in microorganisms , 2009, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[39]  Russell G. Jones,et al.  Tumor suppressors and cell metabolism: a recipe for cancer growth. , 2009, Genes & development.

[40]  Pamela K. Kreeger,et al.  Cancer systems biology: a network modeling perspective , 2009, Carcinogenesis.

[41]  B. Palsson,et al.  A protocol for generating a high-quality genome-scale metabolic reconstruction , 2010 .

[42]  Olaf Wolkenhauer,et al.  Systems biologists seek fuller integration of systems biology approaches in new cancer research programs. , 2010, Cancer research.

[43]  Ronan M. T. Fleming,et al.  Quantitative prediction of cellular metabolism with constraint-based models: the COBRA Toolbox v2.0 , 2007, Nature Protocols.

[44]  L. Cantley,et al.  Cancer Cell Metabolism , 2012 .