Optimal Design of a Dynamic Vibration Absorber with Uncertainties

Purpose This contribution aims at analyzing the effect of uncertain parameters on the frequency-domain behavior of a dynamic vibration absorber for the robust optimization that improves its performance based on uncertainty and sensitivity analyses. Although uncertainty and sensitivity analyses have been widely used, the main contribution of this paper consists in applying these concepts in the optimal design of a dynamic absorber considering uncertain operational conditions. Methods Consequently, this study proposes a methodology to increase the efficiency of the dynamic absorber into a frequency band of interest. For this aim, a robust optimization method, solved using a multi-objective optimization algorithm, together with the uncertainty and sensitivities analyses is applied. The uncertain parameters are modeled as random variables based on experimental measurements obtained from a parameter identification procedure. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of the dynamic vibration absorber are assessed based on a probabilistic framework using the Monte Carlo simulation. Robust optimization is implemented and solved using a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Conclusions The numerical results demonstrate the influence of the uncertain parameters on the dynamic behavior of the considered mechanical system. Moreover, the optimization procedure allowed determining its optimal design, improving its dynamic performance, and robustness.

[1]  Michael J. Brennan,et al.  Optimal and robust modal control of a flexible structure using an active dynamic vibration absorber , 2011 .

[2]  Andrew J. Kurdila,et al.  『Fundamentals of Structural Dynamics』(私の一冊) , 2019, Journal of the Society of Mechanical Engineers.

[3]  Hui Zhang,et al.  Robust non-fragile dynamic vibration absorbers with uncertain factors , 2011 .

[4]  V. Steffen,et al.  Robust Optimal Design of a Nonlinear Dynamic Vibration Absorber Combining Sensitivity Analysis , 2010 .

[5]  Jimmy S. Issa Optimal design of a new vibration absorber setup for randomly forced systems , 2013 .

[6]  Aldemir Ap Cavalini,et al.  Model updating of a rotating machine using the self-adaptive differential evolution algorithm , 2016 .

[7]  Juraj Hromkovic,et al.  Algorithmics for hard problems - introduction to combinatorial optimization, randomization, approximation, and heuristics , 2001 .

[8]  Subrata Chakraborty,et al.  Reliability based optimum design of Tuned Mass Damper in seismic vibration control of structures with bounded uncertain parameters , 2011 .

[9]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  A review of robust optimal design and its application in dynamics , 2005 .

[10]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Variance based sensitivity analysis of model output. Design and estimator for the total sensitivity index , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[11]  Didier Dumur,et al.  Stochastic Analysis of a 6-DOF Fully Parallel Robot under Uncertain Parameters. , 2015 .

[12]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[13]  R. Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution: A Practical Approach to Global Optimization (Natural Computing Series) , 2005 .

[14]  Giovanni Iamin Kotinda,et al.  Tuning dynamic vibration absorbers by using ant colony optimization , 2008 .

[15]  F. A. Lara-Molina,et al.  Kinematic performance of planar 5R symmetrical parallel mechanism subjected to clearances and uncertainties , 2018 .

[16]  Aleš Florian,et al.  An efficient sampling scheme: Updated Latin Hypercube Sampling , 1992 .

[17]  Aldemir Ap Cavalini,et al.  Fuzzy Robust Design of Dynamic Vibration Absorbers , 2016 .