Electroencephalographic Alpha Measures Predict Therapeutic Response to a Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Antidepressant: Pre- and Post-Treatment Findings

BACKGROUND There is growing evidence that individual differences among depressed patients on electrophysiologic (EEG), neuroimaging, and neurocognitive measures are predictive of therapeutic response to antidepressant drugs. This study replicates prior findings of pretreatment differences between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) responders and nonresponders in EEG alpha power or asymmetry and examines whether these differences normalize or are stable after treatment. METHODS Resting EEG (eyes open and closed) was recorded from 28 electrodes (nose reference) in 18 depressed patients when off medication and at the end of 12 weeks of fluoxetine treatment. Clinical response was assessed by an independent rater with the Clinical Global Impression Improvement scale. The EEG data were also obtained for 18 healthy adults matched to patients in gender and age. RESULTS Treatment responders had greater alpha power compared with nonresponders and healthy control subjects, with largest differences at occipital sites where alpha was largest. There were also differences in alpha asymmetry between responders and nonresponders at occipital sites. Responders showed greater alpha (less activity) over right than left hemisphere, whereas nonresponders tended to show the opposite asymmetry. Neither alpha power nor asymmetry changed after treatment, and test-retest correlations were high, particularly for alpha power. Alpha power and asymmetry showed reasonable positive predictive value but less negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS The findings confirm reports of alpha differences between antidepressant responders and nonresponders and raise hopes for developing EEG tests for selecting effective treatments for patients. The stability of alpha power and asymmetry differences between SSRI responders and nonresponders after treatment suggests that they represent state-independent characteristics.

[1]  S. Uijtdehaage,et al.  Neurophysiologic predictors of treatment response to fluoxetine in major depression , 1999, Psychiatry Research.

[2]  K. Heilman,et al.  Neglect and Related Disorders , 1984, Seminars in neurology.

[3]  J. Stewart,et al.  Outcome of cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression: relation to hemispheric dominance for verbal processing. , 1997, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[4]  G. Stotz,et al.  The loudness dependency of the auditory evoked N1/P2-component as a predictor of the acute SSRI response in depression , 2000, Psychopharmacology.

[5]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[6]  J. Allen,et al.  Resting frontal electroencephalographic asymmetry in depression: inconsistencies suggest the need to identify mediating factors. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[7]  F. Quitkin,et al.  Regional brain asymmetries in major depression with or without an anxiety disorder: A quantitative electroencephalographic study , 1997, Biological Psychiatry.

[8]  D. Pine,et al.  Electroencephalographic asymmetries in adolescents with major depression: influence of comorbidity with anxiety disorders. , 2000, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[9]  K. Frick,et al.  The Topographical Distribution of Alpha-activity in the Resting EEG of Endogenous-depressive In-patients with and without Clinical Response to Pharmacotherapy , 1986 .

[10]  H. Jasper,et al.  Electrical Activity of the Brain , 1941 .

[11]  A. Leuchter,et al.  Executive dysfunction predicts nonresponse to fluoxetine in major depression. , 2000, Journal of affective disorders.

[12]  R. Davidson,et al.  Anterior cingulate activity as a predictor of degree of treatment response in major depression: evidence from brain electrical tomography analysis. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[13]  C. Shagass,et al.  Some quantitative EEG findings in unmedicated and medicated major depressives. , 1988, Neuropsychobiology.

[14]  M. Hamilton A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION , 1960, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  V. Knott,et al.  EEG correlates of acute and chronic paroxetine treatment in depression. , 2002, Journal of affective disorders.

[16]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Handbook Of Psychophysiology , 2019 .

[17]  Matthew L. Ho,et al.  Differential brain metabolic predictors of response to paroxetine in obsessive-compulsive disorder versus major depression. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[18]  R. Post,et al.  Bupropion and venlafaxine responders differ in pretreatment regional cerebral metabolism in unipolar depression , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[19]  H. Saunders Literature Review : RANDOM DATA: ANALYSIS AND MEASUREMENT PROCEDURES J. S. Bendat and A.G. Piersol Wiley-Interscience, New York, N. Y. (1971) , 1974 .

[20]  Gregor Leicht,et al.  Prediction of treatment response in major depression: integration of concepts. , 2007, Journal of affective disorders.

[21]  C. Tenke,et al.  Reference-free quantification of EEG spectra: Combining current source density (CSD) and frequency principal components analysis (fPCA) , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  P. Fox,et al.  Cingulate function in depression: a potential predictor of treatment response , 1997, Neuroreport.

[23]  F. Quitkin,et al.  Dichotic Listening Tests of Functional Brain Asymmetry Predict Response to Fluoxetine in Depressed Women and Men , 2004, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[24]  B. Jacobs,et al.  Structure and function of the brain serotonin system. , 1992, Physiological reviews.

[25]  D I Boomsma,et al.  Heritability of background EEG across the power spectrum. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[26]  F. Quitkin,et al.  Psychomotor slowing as a predictor of fluoxetine nonresponse in depressed outpatients. , 2006, The American journal of psychiatry.

[27]  Y. Lapierre,et al.  Quantitative EEG in the prediction of antidepressant response to imipramine. , 1996, Journal of affective disorders.

[28]  G. Alexopoulos,et al.  A preliminary study of left frontal region error negativity and symptom improvement in geriatric depression. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[29]  R. Davidson,et al.  Regional brain electrical asymmetries discriminate between previously depressed and healthy control subjects. , 1990, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[30]  L. Schneider,et al.  Topographic quantitative EEG in elderly subjects with major depression. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[31]  Pearl H. Chiu,et al.  Cognitive restructuring and EEG in major depression , 2005, Biological Psychology.

[32]  Jan Seifert,et al.  The latent state-trait structure of resting EEG asymmetry: replication and extension. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[33]  Monte S. Buchsbaum,et al.  Effect of sertraline on regional metabolic rate in patients with affective disorder , 1997, Biological Psychiatry.

[34]  Susan Rosenberg,et al.  Early Changes in Prefrontal Activity Characterize Clinical Responders to Antidepressants , 2002, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[35]  S C Suffin,et al.  Neurometric Subgroups in Attentional and Affective Disorders and Their Association with Pharmacotherapeutic Outcome , 1995, Clinical EEG.

[36]  E. John,et al.  Quantitative electroencephalographic subtyping of obsessive-compulsive disorder , 1993, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[37]  M. Weissman,et al.  Electroencephalographic measures of regional hemispheric activity in offspring at risk for depressive disorders , 2005, Biological Psychiatry.

[38]  L. Schneider,et al.  Topographic electroencephalographic alpha in recovered depressed elderly. , 1989, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[39]  C. C. Wood,et al.  The ɛ-Adjustment Procedure for Repeated-Measures Analyses of Variance , 1976 .

[40]  M. Fava,et al.  Dichotic Listening before and after Fluoxetine Treatment for Major Depression: Relations of Laterality to Therapeutic Response , 1996, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[41]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Patterns of perceptual asymmetry in depression and anxiety: implications for neuropsychological models of emotion and psychopathology. , 1995, Journal of abnormal psychology.