Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanostructured surfaces of carbon and alumina
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Ma,et al. Synthetic nano-scale fibrous extracellular matrix. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[2] N. Rodriguez,et al. A review of catalytically grown carbon nanofibers , 1993 .
[3] G W Blunn,et al. A comparison of bone remodelling around hydroxyapatite-coated, porous-coated and grit-blasted hip replacements retrieved at post-mortem. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.
[4] R. Bizios,et al. Conditions which promote mineralization at the bone-implant interface: a model in vitro study. , 1996, Biomaterials.
[5] T. Webster,et al. Nanoceramic surface roughness enhances osteoblast and osteoclast functions for improved orthopaedic/dental implant efficacy , 2001 .
[6] T. Webster. Nanophase ceramics: The future orthopedic and dental implant material , 2001 .
[7] Y. Yamashita,et al. Differences in microstructural characteristics of dense HA and HA coating. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.
[8] T. Webster,et al. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Biomaterials.
[9] D. Ginley,et al. Nanosized alumina fibers , 2001 .
[10] Thomas J Webster,et al. Nanostructured polymer/nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion. , 2002, Tissue engineering.
[11] Sheldon R. Simon,et al. Orthopaedic basic science , 1994 .
[12] Anthony G. Gristina,et al. Host Reactions to Biomaterials and Their Evaluation , 1996 .
[13] Joon B. Park. Biomaterials:An Introduction , 1992 .
[14] Buddy D. Ratner,et al. Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine , 1996 .