Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanostructured surfaces of carbon and alumina

It is of the utmost importance to increase the activity of bone cells on the surface of materials used in the design of orthopaedic implants. Increased activity of such cells can promote either integration of these materials into surrounding bone or complete replacement with naturally produced bone if biodegradable materials are used. Osteoblasts are bone-producing cells and, for that reason, are the cells of interest in initial studies of new orthopaedic implants. If these cells are functioning normally, they lay down bone matrix onto both existing bone and prosthetic materials implanted into the body. It is generally accepted that a successful material should enhance osteoblast function, leading to more bone deposition and, consequently, increased strength of the interface between the material and juxtaposed bone. The present study provided the first evidence of greater osteoblast function on carbon and alumina formulations that mimic the nano-dimensional crystal geometry of hydroxyapatite found in bone.

[1]  P. Ma,et al.  Synthetic nano-scale fibrous extracellular matrix. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[2]  N. Rodriguez,et al.  A review of catalytically grown carbon nanofibers , 1993 .

[3]  G W Blunn,et al.  A comparison of bone remodelling around hydroxyapatite-coated, porous-coated and grit-blasted hip replacements retrieved at post-mortem. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[4]  R. Bizios,et al.  Conditions which promote mineralization at the bone-implant interface: a model in vitro study. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[5]  T. Webster,et al.  Nanoceramic surface roughness enhances osteoblast and osteoclast functions for improved orthopaedic/dental implant efficacy , 2001 .

[6]  T. Webster Nanophase ceramics: The future orthopedic and dental implant material , 2001 .

[7]  Y. Yamashita,et al.  Differences in microstructural characteristics of dense HA and HA coating. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  T. Webster,et al.  Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[9]  D. Ginley,et al.  Nanosized alumina fibers , 2001 .

[10]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Nanostructured polymer/nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[11]  Sheldon R. Simon,et al.  Orthopaedic basic science , 1994 .

[12]  Anthony G. Gristina,et al.  Host Reactions to Biomaterials and Their Evaluation , 1996 .

[13]  Joon B. Park Biomaterials:An Introduction , 1992 .

[14]  Buddy D. Ratner,et al.  Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine , 1996 .