Single-molecule FRET analysis of DNA binding and bending by yeast HMGB protein Nhp6A

High-mobility group B (HMGB) proteins bind duplex DNA without sequence specificity, facilitating the formation of compact nucleoprotein structures by increasing the apparent flexibility of DNA through the introduction of DNA kinks. It has remained unclear whether HMGB binding and DNA kinking are simultaneous and whether the induced kink is rigid (static) or flexible. The detailed molecular mechanism of HMGB-induced DNA ‘softening’ is explored here by single-molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer studies of single yeast Nhp6A (yNhp6A) proteins binding to short DNA duplexes. We show that the local effect of yNhp6A protein binding to DNA is consistent with formation of a single static kink that is short lived (lifetimes of a few seconds) under physiological buffer conditions. Within the time resolution of our experiments, this static kink occurs at the instant the protein binds to the DNA, and the DNA straightens at the instant the protein dissociates from the DNA. Our observations support a model in which HMGB proteins soften DNA through random dynamic binding and dissociation, accompanied by DNA kinking and straightening, respectively.

[1]  G. Hong,et al.  Nucleic Acids Research , 2015, Nucleic Acids Research.

[2]  Micah J. McCauley,et al.  Basic N-terminus of yeast Nhp6A regulates the mechanism of its DNA flexibility enhancement. , 2012, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  Greg L. Hura,et al.  Conformational trapping of Mismatch Recognition Complex MSH2/MSH3 on repair-resistant DNA loops , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  W. Olson,et al.  Understanding apparent DNA flexibility enhancement by HU and HMGB architectural proteins. , 2011, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  Reid C. Johnson,et al.  Concentration-dependent exchange accelerates turnover of proteins bound to double-stranded DNA , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[6]  J. Kahn,et al.  Quantitative methods for measuring DNA flexibility in vitro and in vivo. , 2011, Methods in enzymology.

[7]  D. Stillman Nhp6: a small but powerful effector of chromatin structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2010, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[8]  Mark C. Williams,et al.  Introduction to Biophysics of DNA–Protein Interactions: From Single Molecules to Biological Systems , 2010 .

[9]  Micah J. McCauley,et al.  Mechanism of DNA flexibility enhancement by HMGB proteins , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  D. Lilley,et al.  Orientation dependence in fluorescent energy transfer between Cy3 and Cy5 terminally attached to double-stranded nucleic acids , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  L. J. Maher,et al.  Transient HMGB protein interactions with B-DNA duplexes and complexes. , 2008, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[12]  Micah J. McCauley,et al.  HMGB binding to DNA: single and double box motifs. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  S. McKinney,et al.  Nonblinking and long-lasting single-molecule fluorescence imaging , 2006, Nature Methods.

[14]  S. McKinney,et al.  Analysis of single-molecule FRET trajectories using hidden Markov modeling. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Micah J. McCauley,et al.  Dual binding modes for an HMG domain from human HMGB2 on DNA. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Reid C. Johnson,et al.  Micromechanical analysis of the binding of DNA-bending proteins HMGB1, NHP6A, and HU reveals their ability to form highly stable DNA-protein complexes. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[17]  Cees Dekker,et al.  Dual architectural roles of HU: formation of flexible hinges and rigid filaments. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  T. Ha,et al.  Probing single-stranded DNA conformational flexibility using fluorescence spectroscopy. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[19]  T. Formosa,et al.  Multiple Nhp6 Molecules Are Required to Recruit Spt16-Pob3 to Form yFACT Complexes and to Reorganize Nucleosomes* , 2003, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  A. Travers Priming the nucleosome: a role for HMGB proteins? , 2003, EMBO reports.

[21]  James E Masse,et al.  The S. cerevisiae architectural HMGB protein NHP6A complexed with DNA: DNA and protein conformational changes upon binding. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  J. Feigon,et al.  Binding to cisplatin-modified DNA by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HMGB protein Nhp6A. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[23]  L. Tang,et al.  Determining the DNA bending angle induced by non-specific high mobility group-1 (HMG-1) proteins: a novel method. , 2000, Biochemistry.

[24]  C. Pabo,et al.  Basis for recognition of cisplatin-modified DNA by high-mobility-group proteins , 1999, Nature.

[25]  F. Allain,et al.  Solution structure of the HMG protein NHP6A and its interaction with DNA reveals the structural determinants for non‐sequence‐specific binding , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[26]  M. Churchill,et al.  Interactions of high mobility group box proteins with DNA and chromatin. , 1999, Methods in enzymology.

[27]  R. C. Johnson,et al.  Determinants of DNA binding and bending by the Saccharomyces cerevisiae high mobility group protein NHP6A that are important for its biological activities. Role of the unique N terminus and putative intercalating methionine. , 1998, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  R. Reeves,et al.  High-mobility-group chromosomal proteins: architectural components that facilitate chromatin function. , 1996, Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology.

[29]  R Grosschedl,et al.  HMG domain proteins: architectural elements in the assembly of nucleoprotein structures. , 1994, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[30]  T. Creighton Methods in Enzymology , 1968, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[31]  S. Colowick,et al.  Methods in Enzymology , Vol , 1966 .