A fluidic demultiplexer for controlling large arrays of soft actuators.

The field of soft robotics endeavors to create robots that are mostly, if not entirely, soft. While there have been significant advances in both soft actuators and soft sensors, there has been relatively little work done in the development of soft control systems. This work proposes a soft microfluidic demultiplexer as a potential control system for soft robotics. Demultiplexers enable the control of many outputs with just a few inputs, increasing a soft robot's complexity while minimizing its reliance on external valves and other off-board components. The demultiplexer in this work improves upon earlier microfluidic demultiplexers with its nearly two-fold reduction of inputs, a design feature that simplifies control and increases efficiency. Additionally, the demultiplexer in this work is designed to accommodate the high pressures and flow rates that soft robotics demands. The demultiplexer is characterized from the level of individual valves to full system parameters, and its functionality is demonstrated by controlling an array of individually addressable soft actuators.

[1]  Jung Woo Lee,et al.  Battery-free, stretchable optoelectronic systems for wireless optical characterization of the skin , 2016, Science Advances.

[2]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Soft robotics: Technologies and systems pushing the boundaries of robot abilities , 2016, Science Robotics.

[3]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Soft robotics for chemists. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[4]  TrimmerBarry Soft Robot Control Systems: A New Grand Challenge? , 2014 .

[5]  Axel Scherer,et al.  Experimentally validated quantitative linear model for the device physics of elastomeric microfluidic valves. , 2007, Journal of applied physics.

[6]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Pneumatic Energy Sources for Autonomous and Wearable Soft Robotics , 2014 .

[7]  Michael T. Tolley,et al.  Translucent soft robots driven by frameless fluid electrode dielectric elastomer actuators , 2018, Science Robotics.

[8]  Metin Sitti,et al.  Controllable load sharing for soft adhesive interfaces on three-dimensional surfaces , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Jeong-Yun Sun,et al.  Highly stretchable, transparent ionic touch panel , 2016, Science.

[10]  Wei Gao,et al.  Wearable Microfluidic Diaphragm Pressure Sensor for Health and Tactile Touch Monitoring , 2017, Advanced materials.

[11]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Using explosions to power a soft robot. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[12]  Lingfeng Chen,et al.  Soft Robotics: Academic Insights and Perspectives Through Bibliometric Analysis , 2018, Soft robotics.

[13]  George M. Whitesides,et al.  A soft, bistable valve for autonomous control of soft actuators , 2018, Science Robotics.

[14]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[15]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Comparative analysis of fabrication methods for achieving rounded microchannels in PDMS , 2016 .

[16]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Fluid-driven origami-inspired artificial muscles , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Autonomous Soft Robotic Fish Capable of Escape Maneuvers Using Fluidic Elastomer Actuators. , 2014, Soft robotics.

[19]  William H. Grover,et al.  Development and multiplexed control of latching pneumatic valves using microfluidic logical structures. , 2006, Lab on a chip.

[20]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Autonomous undulatory serpentine locomotion utilizing body dynamics of a fluidic soft robot , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[21]  J. Derisi,et al.  Systematic characterization of feature dimensions and closing pressures for microfluidic valves produced via photoresist reflow. , 2012, Lab on a chip.

[22]  Daniel M. Vogt,et al.  Design and Characterization of a Soft Multi-Axis Force Sensor Using Embedded Microfluidic Channels , 2013, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[23]  M. C. Tracey,et al.  Mechanical characterization of bulk Sylgard 184 for microfluidics and microengineering , 2014 .

[24]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Buckling Pneumatic Linear Actuators Inspired by Muscle , 2016 .

[25]  MajidiCarmel,et al.  Soft Robotics: A Perspective—Current Trends and Prospects for the Future , 2014 .

[26]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  An Additive Millimeter‐Scale Fabrication Method for Soft Biocompatible Actuators and Sensors , 2017, Advanced Materials Technologies.

[27]  S. Quake,et al.  Monolithic microfabricated valves and pumps by multilayer soft lithography. , 2000, Science.

[28]  M. Sitti,et al.  Soft Actuators for Small‐Scale Robotics , 2017, Advanced materials.

[29]  D. Rus,et al.  Design, fabrication and control of soft robots , 2015, Nature.

[30]  G. Whitesides,et al.  Pneumatic Networks for Soft Robotics that Actuate Rapidly , 2014 .

[31]  Sheila Russo,et al.  Increasing the Dimensionality of Soft Microstructures through Injection‐Induced Self‐Folding , 2018, Advanced materials.

[32]  K. Bertoldi,et al.  Dielectric Elastomer Based “Grippers” for Soft Robotics , 2015, Advanced materials.

[33]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research , 2008 .

[34]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots , 2016, Nature.

[35]  Sanlin S. Robinson,et al.  Highly stretchable electroluminescent skin for optical signaling and tactile sensing , 2016, Science.

[36]  R. Wood,et al.  Meshworm: A Peristaltic Soft Robot With Antagonistic Nickel Titanium Coil Actuators , 2013, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[37]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Soft Robotics: Review of Fluid‐Driven Intrinsically Soft Devices; Manufacturing, Sensing, Control, and Applications in Human‐Robot Interaction   , 2017 .

[38]  Katia Bertoldi,et al.  Kirigami skins make a simple soft actuator crawl , 2018, Science Robotics.

[39]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Digital logic for soft devices , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  LuNanshu,et al.  Flexible and Stretchable Electronics Paving the Way for Soft Robotics , 2014 .

[41]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  A 3D-printed, functionally graded soft robot powered by combustion , 2015, Science.

[42]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Wearable soft sensing suit for human gait measurement , 2014, Int. J. Robotics Res..