Using multidimensional scaling to quantify similarity in visual search and beyond
暂无分享,去创建一个
Tamaryn Menneer | Michael C Hout | Arryn Robbins | Michael C. Hout | Hayward J Godwin | Gemma Fitzsimmons | Stephen D Goldinger | S. Goldinger | H. Godwin | Arryn Robbins | Gemma Fitzsimmons | T. Menneer
[1] R. Shepard,et al. The internal representation of numbers , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.
[2] S. Liversedge,et al. Saccadic eye movements and cognition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[3] N. Jaworska,et al. A Review of Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) and its Utility in Various Psychological Domains , 2009 .
[4] Eytan Ruppin,et al. Similarity in Perception: A Window to Brain Organization , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[5] D S Blough,et al. Quantitative relations between visual search speed and target-distractor similarity , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.
[6] Yifan Peng,et al. Studying Relationships between Human Gaze, Description, and Computer Vision , 2013, 2013 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.
[7] Erik D. Reichle,et al. Eye movements in reading and information processing : , 2015 .
[8] J. Henderson. Human gaze control during real-world scene perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[9] Michelle R. Greene,et al. Visual search in scenes involves selective and nonselective pathways , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[10] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.
[11] Melina A. Kunar,et al. The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.
[12] Wei Zhang,et al. Object class recognition using multiple layer boosting with heterogeneous features , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).
[13] Rachel A Robbins,et al. A Review and Clarification of the Terms “holistic,” “configural,” and “relational” in the Face Perception Literature , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[14] Naomi M. Kenner,et al. How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search , 2004, Vision Research.
[15] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. Similarity in context , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[16] C. Koch,et al. Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[17] Robert L. Goldstone. The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork , 1994, Cognition.
[18] Kyle R. Cave,et al. Search for multiple targets of different colours: misguided eye movements reveal a reduction of colour selectivity , 2011 .
[19] P. Hofstaetter. [Similarity]. , 2020, Psyche.
[20] Radford M. Neal. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2007, Technometrics.
[21] Megan H. Papesh,et al. Deficits in cross-race face learning: insights from eye movements and pupillometry. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[22] R. Shepard,et al. How a cognitive psychologist came to seek universal laws , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[23] Patrick Cavanagh,et al. Mobile computation: spatiotemporal integration of the properties of objects in motion. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[24] J. Duncan,et al. Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.
[25] S Ullman,et al. Shifts in selective visual attention: towards the underlying neural circuitry. , 1985, Human neurobiology.
[26] A. Pollatsek,et al. The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[27] Patrick J. F. Groenen,et al. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications , 2003 .
[28] R. Goebel,et al. Human Object-Similarity Judgments Reflect and Transcend the Primate-IT Object Representation , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[29] William G Hayward,et al. Visual search. , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.
[30] K. Rayner. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[31] Michael C Hout,et al. Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[32] David H Brainard,et al. Surface color perception and equivalent illumination models. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[33] David A. Tovar,et al. Representational dynamics of object vision: the first 1000 ms. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[34] Tamaryn Menneer,et al. Visual similarity is stronger than semantic similarity in guiding visual search for numbers , 2014 .
[35] C. Helfrich-Förster,et al. Drosophila timeless2 Is Required for Chromosome Stability and Circadian Photoreception , 2010, Current Biology.
[36] Xingshan Li,et al. Search for two categories of target produces fewer fixations to target-color items. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[37] S. Goldinger,et al. Episodic memory reflected in printed word naming , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[38] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. The sensitization and differentiation of dimensions during category learning. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[39] R N Shepard,et al. Multidimensional Scaling, Tree-Fitting, and Clustering , 1980, Science.
[40] G. Zelinsky,et al. Short article: Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[41] Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al. Searching through the hierarchy: How level of target categorization affects visual search , 2012, Visual cognition.
[42] Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al. Classifying objects based on their visual similarity to target categories , 2008 .
[43] A. Treisman. Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[44] Michael Lindenbaum,et al. Predicting visual search performance by quantifying stimuli similarities. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[45] Ali Borji,et al. State-of-the-Art in Visual Attention Modeling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.
[46] Robert L. Goldstone,et al. Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.
[47] Carrick C. Williams,et al. To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[48] Douglas L. Hintzman,et al. Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. , 1988 .
[49] Dennis Norris,et al. Visual similarity effects on masked priming , 2014, Memory & cognition.
[50] G. Zelinsky. A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. , 2008, Psychological review.
[51] Robert G Alexander,et al. Visual similarity effects in categorical search. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[52] Yifan Peng,et al. Modelling eye movements in a categorical search task , 2013, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[53] Stephen D. Goldinger,et al. A multidimensional scaling analysis of own- and cross-race face spaces , 2010, Cognition.
[54] A. Torralba,et al. The role of context in object recognition , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[55] A. Tversky,et al. Similarity, separability, and the triangle inequality. , 1982, Psychological review.
[56] Adam T. Biggs,et al. Improving the Efficacy of Security Screening Tasks: A Review of Visual Search Challenges and Ways to Mitigate Their Adverse Effects , 2015 .
[57] Douglas L. Hintzman,et al. "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .
[58] James W Bisley,et al. The what, where, and why of priority maps and their interactions with visual working memory , 2015, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[59] Jesse Spencer-Smith,et al. The Dynamics of Similarity , 1997 .
[60] Michael C. Hout,et al. Host species and developmental stage, but not host social structure, affects bacterial community structure in socially polymorphic bees. , 2014, FEMS microbiology ecology.
[61] D. Gentner,et al. Respects for similarity , 1993 .
[62] Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al. Eye movements in iconic visual search , 2002, Vision Research.
[63] J. V. van Berkum,et al. How robust is the language architecture? The case of mood , 2013, Front. Psychol..
[64] Naomi M. Kenner,et al. Low target prevalence is a stubborn source of errors in visual search tasks. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[65] Gregory J. Zelinsky,et al. Searching for camouflaged targets: Effects of target-background similarity on visual search , 2006, Vision Research.
[66] David C Knill,et al. Sensorimotor Processing and Goal-Directed Movement. , 2007, Journal of vision.
[67] R. Shepard. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .
[68] Forrest W. Young,et al. ALSCAL: A nonmetric multidimensional scaling program with several individual-differences options , 1978 .
[69] R. Nosofsky. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986 .
[70] Christopher K. Riesbeck,et al. Inside Case-Based Reasoning , 1989 .
[71] Graham Thompson,et al. The Role of Semantic Clustering in Optimal Memory Foraging , 2015, Cogn. Sci..
[72] G Salton,et al. Developments in Automatic Text Retrieval , 1991, Science.
[73] R. Nosofsky. Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[74] Allen Allport,et al. Visual attention , 1989 .
[75] J. Wolfe,et al. What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[76] Matthieu Guillaumin,et al. From categories to subcategories: Large-scale image classification with partial class label refinement , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[77] Grigori Yourganov,et al. The Perception of Naturalness Correlates with Low-Level Visual Features of Environmental Scenes , 2014, PloS one.
[78] G C Gilmore,et al. Multidimensional letter similarity derived from recognition errors , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.
[79] Ronald A. Rensink,et al. The rapid extraction of numeric meaning , 2006, Vision Research.
[80] Pauline Faye,et al. Perceptive free sorting and verbalization tasks with naive subjects: an alternative to descriptive mappings , 2004 .
[81] L. Itti. Author address: , 1999 .
[82] J. Wolfe,et al. Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[83] S. Goldinger. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.
[84] P. Cavanagh,et al. Looking ahead: the perceived direction of gaze shifts before the eyes move. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[85] A. Treisman,et al. A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.
[86] Stefanie I. Becker. Determinants of Dwell Time in Visual Search: Similarity or Perceptual Difficulty? , 2011, PloS one.
[87] S. M. Luria,et al. Eye movements during search for coded and uncoded targets , 1975 .
[88] Stephen R. Mitroff,et al. Attentional guidance by working memory overrides saliency cues in visual search , 2012 .
[89] N. Kriegeskorte,et al. Inverse MDS: Inferring Dissimilarity Structure from Multiple Item Arrangements , 2012, Front. Psychology.
[90] Man-Suk Oh,et al. A simple and efficient Bayesian procedure for selecting dimensionality in multidimensional scaling , 2012, J. Multivar. Anal..
[91] R. Shiffrin,et al. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. , 1984, Psychological review.
[92] R N SHEPARD,et al. Analysis of Proximities as a Technique for the Study of Information Processing in Man1 , 1963, Human factors.
[93] M. Lee. Determining the Dimensionality of Multidimensional Scaling Representations for Cognitive Modeling. , 2001, Journal of mathematical psychology.
[94] D G Altman,et al. Towards a framework for analysis of eye-tracking studies in the three dimensional environment: a study of visual search by experienced readers of endoluminal CT colonography. , 2014, The British journal of radiology.
[95] R. Shepard. The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. , 1962 .
[96] Jeremy M. Wolfe. Guided Search 4.0: A guided search model that does not require memory for rejected distractors , 2010 .
[97] A Treisman,et al. Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.
[98] G. Zelinsky,et al. Eye can read your mind: decoding gaze fixations to reveal categorical search targets. , 2013, Journal of vision.
[99] Gyslain Giguère,et al. Collecting and analyzing data in multidimensional scaling experiments: A guide for psychologists using SPSS , 2006 .
[100] P. S. Vivekananthan,et al. A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[101] Michael C Hout,et al. The Novel Object and Unusual Name (NOUN) Database: A collection of novel images for use in experimental research , 2016, Behavior research methods.
[102] Forrest W. Young,et al. Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 1981 .
[103] J. Duncan,et al. Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[104] Joseph L. Zinnes,et al. Theory and Methods of Scaling. , 1958 .
[105] G. Zelinsky,et al. Modeling guidance and recognition in categorical search: bridging human and computer object detection. , 2012, Journal of vision.
[106] George L. Malcolm,et al. Searching in the dark: Cognitive relevance drives attention in real-world scenes , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[107] Ali Borji,et al. Quantitative Analysis of Human-Model Agreement in Visual Saliency Modeling: A Comparative Study , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.
[108] J. Chang,et al. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an n-way generalization of “Eckart-Young” decomposition , 1970 .
[109] Michael C Hout,et al. Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[110] Kyle R. Cave,et al. Dual-target search for high and low prevalence X-ray threat targets , 2010 .
[111] Xin Chen,et al. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance , 2006, Vision Research.
[112] Preeti Verghese,et al. The psychophysics of visual search , 2000, Vision Research.
[113] Nick Donnelly,et al. The impact of Relative Prevalence on dual-target search for threat items from airport X-ray screening. , 2010, Acta psychologica.
[114] Ellen M. Migo,et al. A visual object stimulus database with standardized similarity information , 2013, Behavior research methods.
[115] M. Chun,et al. Top-Down Attentional Guidance Based on Implicit Learning of Visual Covariation , 1999 .
[116] Paul E. Green,et al. Multidimensional Scaling: Concepts and Applications , 1989 .
[117] Michael C. Hout,et al. Multidimensional Scaling , 2003, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology.
[118] R. Nosofsky,et al. An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. , 1997, Psychological review.
[119] R. Shepard,et al. Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.
[120] K. Rayner. The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[121] Bolei Zhou,et al. Object Detectors Emerge in Deep Scene CNNs , 2014, ICLR.
[122] Michael C. Hout,et al. The versatility of SpAM: a fast, efficient, spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[123] Alex D. Hwang,et al. A model of top-down attentional control during visual search in complex scenes. , 2009, Journal of vision.
[124] Max Coltheart,et al. Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .
[125] Stephen R Mitroff,et al. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance Attentional Guidance by Working Memory Overrides Salience Cues in Visual Search , 2013 .
[126] J. Henderson,et al. High-level scene perception. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.
[127] Nick Donnelly,et al. The cost of search for multiple targets: effects of practice and target similarity. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[128] Willem J. Heiser,et al. PROXSCAL: A Multidimensional Scaling Program for Individual Differences Scaling with Constraints , 2014 .
[129] Wolf Schwarz,et al. Numerical distance effects in visual search , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.
[130] Gabriela Csurka,et al. Images as sets of locally weighted features , 2012, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..
[131] John Palmer,et al. Visual search and attention: an overview. , 2004, Spatial vision.
[132] D. Ballard,et al. Eye guidance in natural vision: reinterpreting salience. , 2011, Journal of vision.
[133] R. Goldstone. An efficient method for obtaining similarity data , 1994 .
[134] Roger N. Shepard,et al. Additive clustering: Representation of similarities as combinations of discrete overlapping properties. , 1979 .
[135] Nick Donnelly,et al. Using the dual-target cost to explore the nature of search target representations. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[136] Gregory J Zelinsky,et al. Effects of target typicality on categorical search. , 2014, Journal of vision.
[137] Stephen D. Goldinger,et al. MM-MDS: A Multidimensional Scaling Database with Similarity Ratings for 240 Object Categories from the Massive Memory Picture Database , 2014, PloS one.
[138] Jeremy M Wolfe,et al. Visual Attention , 2020, Computational Models for Cognitive Vision.
[139] Gregory J Zelinsky,et al. TAM: Explaining off-object fixations and central fixation tendencies as effects of population averaging during search , 2012, Visual cognition.
[140] Susan L. Franzel,et al. Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[141] C. Koch,et al. Probabilistic modeling of eye movement data during conjunction search via feature-based attention. , 2007, Journal of vision.
[142] Nick Donnelly,et al. High or low target prevalence increases the dual-target cost in visual search. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[143] A. Tversky. Features of Similarity , 1977 .
[144] Stephen D. Goldinger,et al. Learning in repeated visual search , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.