INTEGRATED DATA CAPTURING REQUIREMENTS FOR 3D SEMANTIC MODELLING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE: THE INCEPTION PROTOCOL

Abstract. The generation of high quality 3D models can be still very time-consuming and expensive, and the outcome of digital reconstructions is frequently provided in formats that are not interoperable, and therefore cannot be easily accessed. This challenge is even more crucial for complex architectures and large heritage sites, which involve a large amount of data to be acquired, managed and enriched by metadata. In this framework, the ongoing EU funded project INCEPTION – Inclusive Cultural Heritage in Europe through 3D semantic modelling proposes a workflow aimed at the achievements of efficient 3D digitization methods, post-processing tools for an enriched semantic modelling, web-based solutions and applications to ensure a wide access to experts and non-experts. In order to face these challenges and to start solving the issue of the large amount of captured data and time-consuming processes in the production of 3D digital models, an Optimized Data Acquisition Protocol (DAP) has been set up. The purpose is to guide the processes of digitization of cultural heritage, respecting needs, requirements and specificities of cultural assets.

[1]  Fabrizio Ivan Apollonio,et al.  A paradata documentation methodology for the Uncertainty Visualization in digital reconstruction of CH artifacts , 2015 .

[2]  Alessandro Rizzi,et al.  Reality-based 3D documentation of natural and cultural heritage sites—techniques, problems, and examples , 2010 .

[3]  Yen Ya Ning,et al.  THE STANDARD OF MANAGEMENT AND APPLICATION OF CULTURAL HERITAGE DOCUMENTATION , 2011 .

[4]  Michael Bosse,et al.  Efficiently capturing large, complex cultural heritage sites with a handheld mobile 3D laser mapping system , 2014 .

[5]  Federica Maietti,et al.  3D Documentation and Semantic Aware Representation of Cultural Heritage: the INCEPTION Project , 2016, GCH.

[6]  Paul Bryan,et al.  3D Recording, Documentation and Management of Cultural Heritage , 2017 .

[7]  Wolfgang Boehler,et al.  Investigating Laser Scanner Accuracy , 2005 .

[8]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  3D Recording, Documentation and Management of Cultural Heritage , 2016 .

[9]  H. Otani,et al.  COMPARISON AND EVALUATION OF LASER SCANNING AND PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND THEIR COMBINED USE FOR DIGITAL RECORDING OF CULTURAL HERITAGE , 2004 .

[10]  George Pavlidis,et al.  Multi-image 3D reconstruction data evaluation , 2014 .

[11]  Emmanuel Maravelakis,et al.  Analysing User Needs for a Unified 3D Metadata Recording and Exploitation of Cultural Heritage Monuments System , 2013, ISVC.

[12]  Fabio Remondino,et al.  Heritage Recording and 3D Modeling with Photogrammetry and 3D Scanning , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Luciano Silva,et al.  3D reconstruction methods for digital preservation of cultural heritage: A survey , 2014, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[14]  Federica Maietti,et al.  3D Integrated Laser Scanner Survey and Modelling for Accessing and Understanding European Cultural Assets , 2016 .

[15]  Rens Bod,et al.  Integrating building information modelling and semantic web technologies for the management of built heritage information , 2013, 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage).

[16]  M. Ioannides,et al.  Digital Heritage , 2010, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.