Quantitative Metrics for Evaluating Parallel Acquisition Techniques in Diffusion Tensor Imaging at 3 Tesla

Objectives:Single-shot echo-planar based diffusion tensor imaging is prone to geometric and intensity distortions. Parallel imaging is a means of reducing these distortions while preserving spatial resolution. A quantitative comparison at 3 T of parallel imaging for diffusion tensor images (DTI) using k-space (generalized auto-calibrating partially parallel acquisitions; GRAPPA) and image domain (sensitivity encoding; SENSE) reconstructions at different acceleration factors, R, is reported here. Materials and Methods:Images were evaluated using 8 human subjects with repeated scans for 2 subjects to estimate reproducibility. Mutual information (MI) was used to assess the global changes in geometric distortions. The effects of parallel imaging techniques on random noise and reconstruction artifacts were evaluated by placing 26 regions of interest and computing the standard deviation of apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy along with the error of fitting the data to the diffusion model (residual error). Results:The larger positive values in mutual information index with increasing R values confirmed the anticipated decrease in distortions. Further, the MI index of GRAPPA sequences for a given R factor was larger than the corresponding mSENSE images. The residual error was lowest in the images acquired without parallel imaging and among the parallel reconstruction methods, the R = 2 acquisitions had the least error. The standard deviation, accuracy, and reproducibility of the apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in homogenous tissue regions showed that GRAPPA acquired with R = 2 had the least amount of systematic and random noise and of these, significant differences with mSENSE, R = 2 were found only for the fractional anisotropy index. Conclusion:Evaluation of the current implementation of parallel reconstruction algorithms identified GRAPPA acquired with R = 2 as optimal for diffusion tensor imaging.

[1]  Roland Bammer,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging using single‐shot SENSE‐EPI , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  P. Basser,et al.  Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance. Series B.

[3]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  In Vivo Visualization of White Matter Fiber Tracts of Preterm- and Term-Infant Brains With Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2005, Investigative radiology.

[4]  Matthew Brett,et al.  An Evaluation of the Use of Magnetic Field Maps to Undistort Echo-Planar Images , 2003, NeuroImage.

[5]  Roland Bammer,et al.  Current Concepts and Advances in Clinical Parallel Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[6]  P. Parizel,et al.  A brief review of parallel magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, European Radiology.

[7]  Stefan Skare,et al.  A Model-Based Method for Retrospective Correction of Geometric Distortions in Diffusion-Weighted EPI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[8]  T E Conturo,et al.  Diffusion MRI: Precision, accuracy and flow effects , 1995, NMR in biomedicine.

[9]  P. Boesiger,et al.  SENSE‐DTI at 3 T , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  Robin M Heidemann,et al.  SMASH, SENSE, PILS, GRAPPA: How to Choose the Optimal Method , 2004, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[11]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  J Paul Finn,et al.  High Spatial-Resolution CE-MRA of the Carotid Circulation With Parallel Imaging: Comparison of Image Quality Between 2 Different Acceleration Factors at 3.0 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[13]  M. Bastin,et al.  A theoretical study of the effect of experimental noise on the measurement of anisotropy in diffusion imaging. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[14]  Usha Sinha,et al.  Geometric distortion correction of high‐resolution 3 T diffusion tensor brain images , 2005, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  R. Stollberger,et al.  Improved diffusion‐weighted single‐shot echo‐planar imaging (EPI) in stroke using sensitivity encoding (SENSE) , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  Ja-Young Choi,et al.  Optimization of Acquisition Parameters of Diffusion-Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Spinal Cord , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[17]  V. Wedeen,et al.  Reduction of eddy‐current‐induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice‐refocused spin echo , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.