The applied physiology of American football.

American football is the most popular sport in the United States. Its popularity is likely related to the intense, fast-paced, physical style of play. The importance of strength and conditioning to success in football has been long understood. In fact, the strength and conditioning profession in North America can take its roots from American football. However, only recently has scientific study confirmed the positive relationships between strength, speed, and power to success in this sport. Although strength and conditioning are integral to every American football program, the collaboration with sport scientists has not been as fruitful. Only limited studies are available examining the physiological effects of actual competition and physiological adaptations or maladaptations during a season of competition. Most studies on American football have primarily focused on physical performance characteristics of these athletes and how various training paradigms can be used to improve performance.

[1]  R. Kretchmar Exercise and Sport Science , 1989 .

[2]  Andrew C. Fry,et al.  Physical Performance Characteristics of American Collegiate Football Players , 1991 .

[3]  R. Newton,et al.  Performance, biochemical, and endocrine changes during a competitive football game. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  E. S. Roundy,et al.  Comparisons of Size, Strength, Speed, and Power in NCAA Division 1‐A Football Players , 1994 .

[5]  R. Latin,et al.  COMPARISON OF SELECTED PHYSICAL FITNESS AND PERFORMANCE VARIABLES BETWEEN NCAA DIVISION I AND II FOOTBALL PLAYERS , 2004, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[6]  J. Hoffman,et al.  COMPARISON OF OLYMPIC VS. TRADITIONAL POWER LIFTING TRAINING PROGRAMS IN FOOTBALL PLAYERS , 2004, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[7]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Strength Changes During an In‐Season Resistance‐Training Program for Football , 2003, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[8]  B. Chance,et al.  THE EFFECT OF A COMPETITIVE COLLEGIATE FOOTBALL SEASON ON POWER PERFORMANCE AND MUSCLE OXYGEN RECOVERY KINETICS , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[9]  J. Hoffman,et al.  EFFECTS OF β‐HYDROXY β‐METHYLBUTYRATE ON POWER PERFORMANCE AND INDICES OF MUSCLE DAMAGE AND STRESS DURING HIGH‐INTENSITY TRAINING , 2004 .

[10]  Rosemary Clark,et al.  Physiological Aspects of Sports Training and Performance , 2003 .

[11]  J. Mihalik,et al.  The National Football League Combine: Performance Differences Between Drafted and Nondrafted Players Entering the 2004 and 2005 Drafts , 2008, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[12]  L. Burkett,et al.  The National Football League Combine: A Reliable Predictor of Draft Status? , 2003, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[13]  Nicholas A Ratamess,et al.  COMPARISON OF LOADED AND UNLOADED JUMP SQUAT TRAINING ON STRENGTH/POWER PERFORMANCE IN COLLEGE FOOTBALL PLAYERS , 2005, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[14]  W. Kraemer,et al.  Comparison Between Different Off-Season Resistance Training Programs in Division III American College Football Players , 2009, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[15]  K. Berg,et al.  COMPARISON OF PHYSICAL AND PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS OF NCAA DIVISION I FOOTBALL PLAYERS: 1987 AND 2000 , 2004, Journal of strength and conditioning research.

[16]  K. Berg,et al.  Physical and performance characteristics of NCAA Division I football players. , 1990, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[17]  A. Faigenbaum,et al.  Biochemical and hormonal responses during an intercollegiate football season. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  S. Plisk,et al.  Tactical Metabolic Training: Part 1 , 1997 .

[19]  J. Nicholas,et al.  Indirect assessment of cardiovascular "demands" using telemetry on professional football players , 1981, The American journal of sports medicine.