The effect of rugby shoulder padding on peak impact force attenuation

Objective The introduction of shoulder pads has coincided with a rise in shoulder impact injuries in the game of rugby. In this study, the effect of shoulder pads on impact force attenuation was quantified. Design Four different commercially available shoulder pads were tested for material properties. Hard and soft objects were dropped from predetermined heights onto a force plate imparting peak impact forces of 500, 1000 and 1500 N. The pads were then placed on the plate and subjected to 10 repeated impacts for each pad and drop height. Setting Institutional laboratory setting. Main outcome measurements Peak force attenuation, expressed as the percentage reduction of peak force when compared with the no-pad condition, was calculated. Time to peak impact, expressed as the percentage increase of time to peak impact when compared with the no-pad condition, was calculated. Results All pads were found to reduce peak impact force and increase time to peak impact. Results varied between 1% and 70%, depending on the drop height and properties of the impactor. The best performing pad was the thickest, and all pads were best able to attenuate force under hardobject impacts particularly for the lower loads. Conclusion Although several limitations exist to laboratory-based studies such as these, the inconsistencies in force attenuation were nonetheless disappointing. The pads appear to ‘‘bottom out’’ under higher-impact loads and therefore offer little protection when the athlete may need it most.

[1]  W. Garraway,et al.  Epidemiology of rugby football injuries , 1995, The Lancet.

[2]  A Bathgate,et al.  A prospective study of injuries to elite Australian rugby union players , 2002, British journal of sports medicine.

[3]  C W Fuller,et al.  Epidemiology of injuries in English professional rugby union: part 1 match injuries , 2005, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[4]  T. Hosea,et al.  Impact Loading of the Lumbar Spine During Football Blocking , 1997, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  K. Quarrie,et al.  Use of protective equipment in a cohort of rugby players. , 2001, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[6]  J C Alsop,et al.  The New Zealand Rugby Injury and Performance Project: V. Epidemiology of a season of rugby injury. , 1998, British journal of sports medicine.

[7]  I J Deary,et al.  Factors influencing tackle injuries in rugby union football. , 1999, British journal of sports medicine.

[8]  C. Bir,et al.  An Analysis and Comparison of Soccer Shin Guards , 1995, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[9]  P D Milburn,et al.  Biomechanics of Rugby Union Scrummaging , 1993, Sports medicine.

[10]  S. Marshall,et al.  An ecologic study of protective equipment and injury in two contact sports. , 2002, International journal of epidemiology.

[11]  C F Finch,et al.  What do under 15 year old schoolboy rugby union players think about protective headgear? , 2001, British journal of sports medicine.

[12]  A. Amin,et al.  FRACTURES and dislocations of the shoulder girdle. , 2006, Bulletin of the American College of Surgeons.

[13]  D J Chalmers,et al.  The nature and circumstances of tackle injuries in rugby union. , 1999, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[14]  George Gretton,et al.  The Laws of the Game , 2012 .

[15]  W. Garraway,et al.  Impact of professionalism on injuries in rugby union , 2000, British journal of sports medicine.

[16]  Anna Kiner Diagnosis and management of grade II acromioclavicular joint separation , 2004 .

[17]  David F. Gerrard,et al.  The Use of Padding in Rugby Union , 1998, Sports medicine.

[18]  S. Larsson,et al.  The aetiology and epidemiology of clavicular fractures. A prospective study during a two-year period in Uppsala, Sweden. , 2000, Injury.