Analysis of crowd jam in public buildings based on cusp-catastrophe theory

The partial differential equation (PDE) model is established based on the physical movement of the continuous crowd states, and has a strong dependence on the initial conditions. In addition, some characteristics of large crowd like the phenomena of discontinuous jumping in reality are hard to explain by partial differential equations (PDEs). The catastrophe theory, however, can explain these characteristics. The catastrophe model is based on complex systems, and does not rely on the initial conditions. A catastrophe model is presented in this paper to study the movement mechanism of crowd jam. The critical density and the critical velocity are also derived. Results of the analysis indicate that (1) the catastrophe model based on complex systems cannot only describe the phenomena of non-continuity in crowds, but also obtain the critical density and the critical velocity; (2) the catastrophe model does not require initial conditions, besides the problem solving process does not involve the time and location. This means the applicability of the catastrophe model can be used more broadly than PDE model. In other words, the model is better suited to be used in various applications; (3) the catastrophe model can forecast and control the jamming state by monitoring and adjusting the variables in practice. The model supports the decision of the management of emergency evacuation.

[1]  Fred L. Hall,et al.  Catastrophe theory and patterns in 30 second freeway traffic data, implications for incident detection , 1989 .

[2]  H. M. Zhang.  A mathematical theory of traffic hysteresis , 1999 .

[3]  R. Jiang,et al.  Pedestrian behaviors in a lattice gas model with large maximum velocity , 2007 .

[4]  L. F. Henderson,et al.  The Statistics of Crowd Fluids , 1971, Nature.

[5]  Weifeng Yuan,et al.  An evacuation model using cellular automata , 2007 .

[6]  Roger L. Hughes,et al.  A continuum theory for the flow of pedestrians , 2002 .

[7]  E. W. Marchant,et al.  Computer and fluid modelling of evacuation , 1995 .

[8]  R. Hughes.  The flow of human crowds , 2003 .

[9]  Katsuhiro Nishinari,et al.  Modelling of self-driven particles: Foraging ants and pedestrians , 2006 .

[10]  R. Colombo,et al.  Pedestrian flows and non‐classical shocks , 2005 .

[11]  Luca Bruno,et al.  An interpretative model of the pedestrian fundamental relation , 2007 .

[12]  C. Dorso,et al.  Morphological and dynamical aspects of the room evacuation process , 2007 .

[13]  Fred L. Hall,et al.  Application of catastrophe theory to traffic flow variables , 1994 .

[14]  R. A. Smith,et al.  Density, velocity and flow relationships for closely packed crowds , 1995 .

[15]  S. Lo,et al.  On the relationship between crowd density and movement velocity , 2003 .

[16]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Extraction and quantitative analysis of microscopic evacuation characteristics based on digital image processing , 2009 .

[17]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Christian Dogbé.  On the numerical solutions of second order macroscopic models of pedestrian flows , 2008, Comput. Math. Appl..

[19]  Xiaoping Zheng,et al.  Modeling crowd evacuation of a building based on seven methodological approaches , 2009 .

[20]  M. Rosini.  Nonclassical interactions portrait in a macroscopic pedestrian flow model , 2009 .

[21]  Hao Wu,et al.  Experiment and modeling of exit-selecting behaviors during a building evacuation , 2010 .

[22]  W. Weng,et al.  Cellular automaton simulation of pedestrian counter flow with different walk velocities. , 2006, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[23]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Simulating dynamical features of escape panic , 2000, Nature.